While the impact on the average passenger may be limited, Southwest Airlines is updating its employee travel policy in an interesting way, which is good news for some employees, and bad news for others.
In this post:
Southwest Airlines updates jumpseat non-rev policy
One of the best perks of working in the airline industry is the travel benefits, including being able to non-rev (where you can fly for free, or at least at a huge discount, on a space available basis). While the intent is that you get a regular passenger seat if available, in some cases flights are full, and there are no seats for non-revs.
In those situations, Southwest has had a policy whereby non-revs can also fly in flight attendant jumpseats, which is where the working flight attendants also sit. Depending on the aircraft type, there are typically one to three additional jumpseats beyond the number of flight attendants, so it’s a great “last resort” option for hitching a ride on a flight.
Up until now, this has meant that someone like a reservations agent or a gate agent could non-rev in a flight attendant jumpseat. However, thanks to a policy update flagged by JonNYC, that’s no longer the case. With Southwest’s new rules, only pilots and flight attendants can fly in jumpseats, and not other “regular” employees.
The claim is that some people are “up in arms” about this change, given that it’s viewed as being rather anti-employee (well, aside from pilots and flight attendants).
It’s interesting how negative this could work out for some. For example, assume a flight has two empty seats, and four employees on the standby list. Let’s assume that the first two people on the list are flight attendants, while the other two people on the list are reservations agents.
The two flight attendants would typically then clear into passenger seats. Under the old policy, the two reservations agents would’ve had the opportunity to fly in the jumpseats, while now they no longer have that option, and the flight attendants also aren’t required to take the jumpseats to make space for the reservations agents. So the idea is that this new policy will make it much more difficult for non-crew employees to non-rev during busy periods.

Union hails this jumpseat policy change as a victory
TWU Local 556, which represents Southwest flight attendants, has been advocating for this change for some time. For example, several weeks ago, the union made its appeal to management:
“Crew ONLY Jumpseat – Now that Flight Attendants are required in Initial training to perform a physical standards test in addition to operating the door and all emergency evacuation protocols, we request that only Crew occupy the cabin jumpseat(s). Having non-Crew individuals sit in the cabin jumpseat can disrupt in-flight duties. Only other Flight Attendants understand the needs of working crews, and only Flight Attendants are properly trained and qualified in evacuation procedures each year. During an evacuation, having an individual on the jumpseat who is not fully trained and qualified to evacuate an aircraft is not the industry standard and does not provide the highest level of safety.”
The union describes this as a “critical issue” that it has “championed,” and that “not only does this change enhance safety, it also ensures those occupying the jumpseat have an understanding of the operational demands and work taking place in the galley space.” The union also notes that over 30% of flight attendants and pilots commute to work, so this should help them.
Flight attendants are happy about this change for two reasons:
- It gives them better odds of getting a ride on a flight, since there are more seating options that others are excluded from using
- While secondary, I also imagine they’re happy to have fewer people in their “space,” given how limited jumpseat and galley space is
So why would Southwest make a change like this now, that’s friendly toward flight attendants, but less positive for other employee groups? Southwest has undergone quite some changes in recent times, including the introduction of assigned seating, extra legroom seating, etc.
This has been most difficult for flight attendants to deal with, and there has been quite a bit of contention between management and flight attendants over the new policies, including regarding which overhead bins crews can use for their bags.
So it seems to me that this is intended as a bit of a goodwill gesture toward flight attendants, in hopes of them going along with some other policy changes. Still, it’s generally rare to see changes like this outside of a contract negotiation.
Airlines are all over the place in terms of which type of travelers they’ll allow in jumpseats. Southwest’s updated policy is more in line with the US airline industry standard than the old policy.

Bottom line
Southwest Airlines has updated its policy for employees non-reving in jumpseats. Previously, all employees could non-rev in flight attendant jumpseats, which was useful for situations where flights were sold out. However, with an updated policy, only flight attendants and pilots can fly in these seats. This is something that the flight attendant union has been advocating for, and they’ve now gotten their way.
What do you make of this Southwest jumpseat policy change?
This is not news. No other airline ever allows it. This policy was insane.
Unions doing what they do best.
Stir something up for the sake of doing something to justify expensive union dues.
They push out the Aircraft Mintenance Technician also From that Seat (Not the Flight Deck) How a AMT can not operate a Cabin Door if they are the ones that fix everything that Make no sense and also AMTs have to Comute to their home. Not to Mention that that Jomp Seat is Part of the AMFA contract with the Company so Grivance the way to let the AMTs to Jomp seat. The Flight Attendance...
They push out the Aircraft Mintenance Technician also From that Seat (Not the Flight Deck) How a AMT can not operate a Cabin Door if they are the ones that fix everything that Make no sense and also AMTs have to Comute to their home. Not to Mention that that Jomp Seat is Part of the AMFA contract with the Company so Grivance the way to let the AMTs to Jomp seat. The Flight Attendance are just securing their Commute whit the Excuse of safety by False report Any other person out of their work group. They want to keep pilots out of that too but they always try to marry a Capitan with $350k year salary that is the reason they did no fight pilots out not to mention that the pilots are their Boss in the Sky.
I worked for 2 airlines in the 1980s.
Jumpseat was a rare privilege. Ops had to approve ahead of time. The Captain had to really like you.
I only asked twice in 5 years, and I knew the Captain well both times.
Aircraft mechanics should be able to take those seats as well considering they fix the shit....smh. Alot of swa fa's are physically unable to lift even a raft. Pilots dont even know the safety protocols the FA's know. Ridiculous. They just want more freedom to travel easily without competing for a seat among other employees. Tribalism. Smh
Find another job.
Well good was about time They aren’t trained on the ER Procedures so they should not be allowed to sit on a J/S that privilege should be only for the cabin or cockpit crew period
We found the union rep.
You people are completely ignorant of the Company Herbert D. Kelleher built. He instituted this priviledge of ALL Southwest employees riding 4th. Ive been with Southwest for 39 years and have used this priviledge extensively over the years. So, for well over my time, it has never been a Safety issue. All this is made up by these so called overworked 556 members who spend their down time on their phones, ignoring passengers boarding, and...
You people are completely ignorant of the Company Herbert D. Kelleher built. He instituted this priviledge of ALL Southwest employees riding 4th. Ive been with Southwest for 39 years and have used this priviledge extensively over the years. So, for well over my time, it has never been a Safety issue. All this is made up by these so called overworked 556 members who spend their down time on their phones, ignoring passengers boarding, and not wanting to serve drinks and snacks because of non existent turbulence! And yes I work the rear galley area provisioning and I see how useless and sloppy they have become. Thank God Herb isnt around to see what the imbeciles have done to his creation. Pathetic.
You're confusing overworking with laziness.
Just like they're confusing safety with laziness.
Not only was it so crazy that WN let all employees sit in the cabin jumpseats, but even crazier than employees from ramp, reservations, etc. would bump a flight attendant out of the seat if they had seniority.
Maaaybe let other groups sit there (though that’s still a big maybe since those other groups don’t have the required safety training), but to allow them to bump actual flight attendants out of the jumpseats is mind boggling.
Mark...SA and Jumpseat travel on SWA is by time of check-in, not senority. Try to get the facts straight before you have an opinion.
Shocking that Southwest even ever allowed this. I've worked with 5 airlines, over the past 30 years, and NONE have ever allowed anyone without safety training to occupy a flight attendant jumpseat.
in the early aughts, I was on a long-haul international flight, and for reasons, I had to give up my first class seat for the last 10 minutes of the flight; as a result, I was seated in the 1L jump seat for landing (it was a 744) at a major US airport.
Did this violate rules or laws? The FAs didn't seem to care; indeed, they're the ones who moved me out of my seat and to the jumpseat.
Most US airlines restrict the cockpit jumpseat to a very narrow and restricted cadre of employees. This includes pilots, pilot instructors and the like. OAL pilots can be accommodated provided their company has reciprocal agreements. This is very useful in case of an emergency where upon the jumpseat rider can assist with the safety of the aircraft. There are circumstances when a non-pilot (dispatcher/flight controller, mechanic, etc.) would be authorized but under very tight circumstances....
Most US airlines restrict the cockpit jumpseat to a very narrow and restricted cadre of employees. This includes pilots, pilot instructors and the like. OAL pilots can be accommodated provided their company has reciprocal agreements. This is very useful in case of an emergency where upon the jumpseat rider can assist with the safety of the aircraft. There are circumstances when a non-pilot (dispatcher/flight controller, mechanic, etc.) would be authorized but under very tight circumstances. Those with CAS authority can usually fly in the cockpit jumpseat on a sliding authorization scale. Some US carriers will allow CAS authorized passengers to use a flight attendant jumpseat provided the flight attendants are okay with that. In other words, if another flight attendant wants to use the jumpseat, they would have priority over a CAS authorized person. NO regular employees are authorized to ride in the cockpit or flight attendant jump seats. Southwest is/was obviously different with the flight attendant jumpseat.
If I was a pax and saw another pax (out of uniform) sitting in a jump seat for 2 hours, I'd think that was ridiculous.
I can see your concern but, unlike Southwest, most airlines do not allow untrained people to ride in the flight attendant jumpseat. Pilots and pilot instructors do have some "flight attendant training" but, more importantly, they also know cockpit and aircraft procedures.
Are they familiar enough with the galley? Can they serve coffee while on this free flight? :)
Maybe not so ridiculous for the staff trying to get on a full flight and this is the only option left.
Who cares what it looks like ? One can mind their own business and enjoy their confirmed pax seat and not be so concerned about others' business. I think practically any non-rev occupying the jump seat would be an asset in an emergency, in the presence of a trained/working F/A. This isn't rocket...
Maybe not so ridiculous for the staff trying to get on a full flight and this is the only option left.
Who cares what it looks like ? One can mind their own business and enjoy their confirmed pax seat and not be so concerned about others' business. I think practically any non-rev occupying the jump seat would be an asset in an emergency, in the presence of a trained/working F/A. This isn't rocket science evacuating an aircraft. I'd be a lot more concerned about the idiots taking their carryon baggage with during an evacuation......
WN sure seems like it's going out of its way to make life worse for not only its pax but staff as well. Safety, my arse. F/A's just want more chances of being boarded, primadonnas not realizing that there's a lot of other employees required to run the airline. This will only demoralize the non-crew WN employees and create friction. But maybe that's part of the new WN management strategy to 'divide & conquer'....
I swear to dog, if one follows JonNYC, one could skip half the pieces posted on OMAAT. Just kidding! I do wonder how JonNYC is so plugged in to so many carriers and so much info. Quite an impressive guy with both his scoops and his insights/analyses.
As always, thank you Ben!
Dogs are amazing creatures, why would you swear at them?
"At" and "to" are different words.
They mean different things.
The more you know...
You're really justifying swearing to dogs? How bizarre.
Crew members of the same airline should have always been the only people allowed in cabin jump seats; some airlines do not allow FAs of other airlines in FA jumpseats just because they have not been trained on emergency procedures for the operating airline.
I believe some airlines do not allow pilots in FA jumpseats because FAs and other employees are not allowed in cockpit jumpseats although the industry generally allows pilots of reciprocating...
Crew members of the same airline should have always been the only people allowed in cabin jump seats; some airlines do not allow FAs of other airlines in FA jumpseats just because they have not been trained on emergency procedures for the operating airline.
I believe some airlines do not allow pilots in FA jumpseats because FAs and other employees are not allowed in cockpit jumpseats although the industry generally allows pilots of reciprocating airlines to sit in cockpit jumpseats esp. if no cabin seats are available.
This is just another practical outcome of the death of WN's egalatarian model. Life is never the same for everyone and neither should be jumpseat access.
Tim is correct. Only the carrier’s crew should be allowed to occupy jump seats. Anyone occupying a jump seat needs to be able to react quickly in an emergency without being told what to do or how to do it.
and they need to be in uniform.
I worked in management for 2 U.S carriers and we were never allowed in the jumpseats as non rev standbys... only flight attendants and pilots were eligible. I had no idea it had been an option at Southwest for employees other than pilots and flight attendants.