Lufthansa Fined $4 Million For Jewish Passenger Discrimination

Lufthansa Fined $4 Million For Jewish Passenger Discrimination

21

Authorities in the United States are levying a substantial fine against Lufthansa for discriminating against Jewish passengers, and are directing Lufthansa to cease and desist from future similar violations.

The basics of Lufthansa’s Jewish denied boarding fiasco

The United States Department of Transportation (DOT) has just fined Star Alliance carrier Lufthansa $4 million, related to an incident that happened in 2022. I wrote about the incident at the time, though to recap, 131 Jewish passengers were traveling from New York (JFK) to Frankfurt (FRA) to Budapest (BUD), for an annual memorial event to honor an Orthodox rabbi.

On the initial flight, some number of passengers traveling as part of this group reportedly failed to comply with the mask mandate that was in place, and caused trouble for the crew. That’s of course not cool. The issue is the way that Lufthansa handled this.

Rather than specifically singling out those who weren’t complying, the captain of the flight instead alerted a Lufthansa security duty manager about the misbehavior of passengers on the flight, telling the manager that the passengers causing the issues were connecting to Budapest.

As a result, the security manager placed a “high priority comment” on the itineraries of all passengers connecting to Budapest. With such a comment, passengers can’t board a connecting flight until an employee reads the notes on a reservation.

Every one of the passengers who had such a comment was Jewish, despite many not having done anything wrong, and having booked through different methods. However, there were no exact details in the notes about which passengers had misbehaved, so at the connecting gate, the decision was made to just deny all those passengers boarding.

The gate situation got super messy, as you’d expect, and police were called. A Lufthansa employee even openly admitted how all people had to “pay” for the actions of some passengers.

As the DOT concludes:

Lufthansa took action that had an adverse effect on these passengers whose only affiliation with each other was that they were of the same religion and/or ethnicity. Lufthansa’s actions impacted passengers who did not engage in problematic conduct. OACP finds that, under the totality of the circumstances, Lufthansa’s treatment of the 128 Jewish passengers as a collective group, based on the alleged misconduct of a smaller number of those individuals, constitutes discrimination based on religion in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 40127.

Based on our review of available evidence, we find that Lufthansa’s staff made no meaningful effort to specifically identify and track the individuals who failed to follow crew instructions to abide by the applicable laws and regulations, and to tailor the consequences accordingly. Those efforts could have included obtaining the names and likenesses of the misbehaving passengers and linking them to the seats they were sitting in. To the extent that misbehaving passengers were out of their seats, Lufthansa staff could have tracked which seats were empty and then identified which passengers took those seats. While these processes may not have been perfect, they would have resulted in tracking the individuals about whom Lufthansa had concerns and would have significantly reduced the likelihood that innocent passengers would be denied boarding for discriminatory reasons. Instead, Lufthansa has failed to show that its crew took any action to document the identities of specific passengers who engaged in misconduct.

Hopefully Lufthansa has now learned its lesson

This story has gotten a ton of attention over the past couple of years, so it’s interesting to see the DOT levying a fine now. In addition to Lufthansa’s CEO personally issuing an apology for what happened, Lufthansa also provided monetary compensation to passengers for the incident. Lufthansa paid $21,000 to each passenger who was impacted by this denied boarding situation.

This includes a settlement of $20,000, plus $1,000 to cover expenses resulting from being denied boarding. The law firm that negotiated the settlement reportedly took 18% of that. Based on the number of passengers involved, that’s well over $2.5 million in compensation, and that’s before the DOT fine.

I would hope that Lufthansa has learned its lesson at this point. The way the airline went about handling this situation was reprehensible, and it’s really unfortunate that not a single Lufthansa employee throughout this whole process thought “hmm, maybe this isn’t the best way to go about this.”

Lufthansa didn’t handle this situation correctly

Bottom line

The US Department of Transportation has fined Lufthansa $4 million for discriminating against Jewish passengers in May 2022. Some number of passengers failed to follow mask requirements on a New York to Frankfurt flight. When it was discovered that those passengers were connecting to Budapest, the decision was made to deny boarding to all passengers on a similar itinerary.

The one thing those passengers all had in common was that they were Jewish. Now Lufthansa is (fairly) paying the price for this…

What do you make of the DOT’s fine against Lufthansa?

Conversations (21)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. David Diamond

    How did all the employees in a German city, working for a German airline, decide that “ban all them Jews” is a good policy just because some individuals (who happen to be Jews) were not complying with policy?

  2. Sel, D. Guest

    Sounds like the employees involved should be sued and fined, not Lufthansa itself.

    1. Icarus Guest

      Duh. You don’t sue individual front line employees working for a company. Moreover there’s a legal obligation under GDPR not to disclose the names of individual employees.

  3. Shlomo Shekelbergstein Guest

    Was not surprised at all by the original incident. Being a German airline, no doubt most Lufthansa employees would like to fly Jewish passengers directly to concentration camps.

    1. Former LH-Employee Guest

      Idiot! Your comment is not even worth to argue about it!

  4. D3Kingg Grounded Guest

    Oh my goodness. $4 million dollars. We vill never do zis again.

  5. Tennen Diamond

    @Ben (or anyone else), do you know if the EU equivalent agency will impose its own fines/sanctions on LH? Or was this event solely within DOT's authority?

    Also, it appears that they only have to pay $2 million, as the other rest is a "credit" for what they already paid the pax.

    1. Icarus Guest

      No as the journey originated ex the US and is covered by the DOT. The litigation was brought in the US.

  6. betterbub Diamond

    You guys are all afraid of the comment section but the worst comment sections on this blog are on articles where:

    1. ben has a valid complaint about anything
    2. ben mentions delta and we get a single tim dunn comment, a dozen comments referring to tim dunn (along with comment chains where tim dunn argues against these comments), and three dozen comments impersonating tim dunn.

    1. ImmortalSynn Guest

      Clearly though, that's what the operators of this site want, because zero has be done to stop/curb the imitators or Delta sycophancy, despite plenty of complaints by others.

      Makes sense, because engagement = views = ad impressions, but sort of disappointing.

  7. jsm Guest

    The consent decree should also have required Lufthansa to identify the management personnel involved in making this decision and to terminate them (if still working) immediately including barring them from working for Lufthansa and all affiliated airlines permanently.

  8. Abey Guest

    Important to point out that most people were not traveling as part of a group. There either were specifically targeted based on their religion.

  9. Adam Guest

    I'm sure y'all are going to be totally normal on this comment section

  10. Icarus Guest

    Agree it was very badly handled as per the DOT report. As they mentioned, LH should have done everything possible to identify the culprits and would have no issue if they were refused.

    Ultimately it would have clearly been better not to refuse anyone on the connecting flight. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

    Nor sure how they reached a figure of $21k

  11. Andrew Guest

    Mind boggling this happened, even more shocking (or maybe not) on a German airline with their history.

    1. Icarus Guest

      In addition to being culturally sensitive, the Hasidic population are extremely litigious simply because many in the community are also lawyers. This makes it quite easy to file a class action suit.

    2. ML Guest

      yes, lets blame this on the victims of course

    3. T. Davis Guest

      My thoughts exactly.

  12. NOLAviator Guest

    be the comments will be fun on this one

  13. Bruce Guest

    18% of 20,000 is 3600, so the remaining amount is 16,400 dollars.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Icarus Guest

No as the journey originated ex the US and is covered by the DOT. The litigation was brought in the US.

0
Icarus Guest

Duh. You don’t sue individual front line employees working for a company. Moreover there’s a legal obligation under GDPR not to disclose the names of individual employees.

0
Icarus Guest

You piece of s—t

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,163,247 Miles Traveled

32,614,600 Words Written

35,045 Posts Published