JetBlue Offering To Pay Pilots Not To Fly

JetBlue is clearly planning some significant capacity cuts in late summer and early fall, to the point that the airline is offering to pay hundreds of pilots to volunteer not to fly.

JetBlue’s offer for pilots who volunteer to stay home

I recently wrote about how JetBlue is offering flight attendants unpaid leave for the coming months. This comes as the airline plans to reduce its flying schedule for the fall due to industry overcapacity, plus the airline is cutting staffing on some transatlantic flights.

Unsurprisingly, it’s not just flight attendants who are being asked not to work, but also pilots. However, pilots are being offered a much sweeter deal. @xJonNYC reports how JetBlue is offering pilots 50-hour no fly lines for their September bidding, with this being available to over 500 pilots.

For context, pilots at JetBlue are paid by the hour, and they can ordinarily fly up to 1,000 hours per year, which averages out to ~83 hours per month. However, most pilots don’t fly quite the maximum, so pilots are ordinarily guaranteed pay for 70-75 hours per month.

With these no fly lines, pilots can bid to be paid for 50 hours to just stay home. In other words, pilots would get about two-thirds of their usual pay, while not actually having to do anything.

JetBlue currently has roughly 5,000 pilots, so 500+ no fly lines suggests that JetBlue expects needing roughly 10% fewer pilots than usual for September. If this is being offered in September, I imagine we’ll likely see this in some other future months as well (probably not November or December, but maybe October, and definitely January and February).

This isn’t a great situation for JetBlue…

As I always say, the airline industry is incredibly challenging. Even under the best of circumstances, it’s low margin, it’s difficult to renegotiate labor contracts, fixed costs are very high, and it’s hard to adjust capacity to reflect demand.

While the “big three” US carriers have been doing okay, it’s a different story for other US airlines, which haven’t been able to capitalize on strong premium leisure demand, long haul demand, and lucrative credit card contracts related to frequent flyer programs.

JetBlue’s management team is doing everything it can to turn around the airline and cut costs while increasing revenue. I can appreciate the desire to cut capacity in hopes of airfare increasing, but that’s probably also not great for JetBlue’s bottom line:

  • Paying pilots to stay home and not generate any revenue is bad for margins
  • Not flying planes efficiently, and instead keeping some of them grounded, also isn’t great in terms of maximizing revenue

Now, it might still be the lesser of the evils here. But when you’re not making money in the first place, this probably isn’t going to exactly lead to profitability.

JetBlue is in a tough financial spot

Bottom line

JetBlue is expecting to cut capacity in late summer and fall, as many airlines are. As a result, the airline has more flight attendants and pilots than it needs. In addition to offering flight attendants unpaid leave, the airline is also offering pilots roughly two-thirds of their usual pay to just stay home in September. JetBlue hopes that roughly 10% of pilots take advantage of that, which tells you just how deep the capacity cuts will likely be.

What do you make of JetBlue’s offer to pilots?

Conversations (16)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Exit Row Seat Guest

I would image many pilots would take a month or two at a reduced rate as long as their position on the seniority list is not hindered as well as their proficiency requirements. Another factor is their benefits package; will it be altered in any way?

0
‼ 0
Trey Guest

Throughout maybe 80% of my last 20 years of working, I would've absolutely taken 2/3 pay for having two months off!

0
‼ 0
ORD_Is_My_Second_Home Diamond

Yet another imminent sign of death for this abomination of an airline. Its end can't happen soon enough.

0
‼ 0
SMR Guest

@Lucky. This is a win/win. I’m surprised you don’t see the bigger picture - pilot needs are fluctuating based on fleet grounding/delivery delays and yes seasonality of schedule - Furloughing someone for a few months can be way more expensive than just offering reduced rate lines - all airlines have reserves that don’t fly. JetBlue just doesn’t want to pay them 75 hours 500 lines … won’t be used. It will be half of that. This has been going on most the year. You’re late to the game Lucky!

0
‼ 0
Dan77W Guest

This is nothing new…. These VILs were bargained for by the company last fall and resulted in contractual gains to the pilots. This allowed the company to flex staffing on a month to month basis to mitigate for delivery delays of the 220 and for the Pratt + W issues on the Neo which are expected to peak… you guessed it… this FALL !

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published