In the coming weeks, Moldovan-Romanian low cost airline HiSky will begin flying to the United States. The airline has recently updated its schedule to reflect this flight being operated year-round rather than seasonally, so I wanted to recap all the details of this interesting new route.
In this post:
HiSky will fly from Bucharest to New York
As of June 7, 2024, HiSky will launch a new flight between Bucharest (OTP) and New York (JFK). The flight will operate with the following schedule:
H4101 Bucharest to New York departing 8:00AM arriving 11:25AM
H4102 New York to Bucharest departing 1:25PM arriving 6:15AM (+1 day)
The 4,755-mile flight will be offered 4x weekly throughout the summer schedule Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays, and then 3x weekly as of the winter schedule (which starts in late October 2024), when service won’t be operated on Saturdays. For what it’s worth, HiSky will use Terminal 7 at New York JFK, which is kind of the terminal for “random” airlines at the airport.
The flight is blocked at 10hr25min westbound and 9hr50min eastbound. Flights are on sale on HiSky’s website, and the airline has a variety of fares, and even offers business class. Fares are a lot more attractive than they were when flights first went on sale. Economy fares now start at €319.99 one-way in economy, or €1,299.99 one-way in business class.
HiSky will use an Airbus A330-200 for the flight, which is being leased from Air Lease Corporation. The plane features a total of 274 seats, including 24 business class seats in a 2-2-2 configuration, plus 250 economy seats in a 2-4-2 configuration.
HiSky’s Airbus A330-200 has the registration code YR-KID, and it’s an aircraft that first entered service in 2010, and until recently flew for China’s Sichuan Airlines.
I’ve reviewed Sichuan Airlines’ A330 business class, and the airline has keep the same seats that were available on those planes, so expect angled business class seats. However, the airline has removed some business class seats to add more economy seats, to better reflect the demand profile (so the rear mini business class cabin has been eliminated).
My take on HiSky’s new transatlantic flights
Most Americans have probably never heard of HiSky Airlines. For those not familiar, it’s a fairly new airline that was founded in 2019, but it has only really ramped up operations in the past couple of years, given the pandemic. The airline currently has a fleet of seven aircraft, including four Airbus A320s, two Airbus A321LRs, and one Airbus A330.
While I haven’t flown with HiSky, the things that I have heard about the airline have been generally positive, and it seems to be pretty well regarded, and to offer good value and a solid experience.
As far as bold new airline routes go, I have to say that HiSky’s new service doesn’t seem like a terrible idea, with one major caveat:
- It’s easy enough to make money flying across the Atlantic in summer, given the amount of demand
- While US airlines have expanded a ton with summer seasonal flying to Europe, no US carriers have planned service to Romania, so HiSky will be the only airline operating this route
- The catch is that HiSky is only selling point-to-point tickets; the airline doesn’t have a robust connecting network in Europe (when you go to HiSky’s website, you’ll see the only option for flights from New York is to Bucharest), and no partner in the United States
- The part of this plan that makes no sense is that HiSky intends to also operate this route in winter, as that seems highly unlikely to be successful; it seems much more logical for HiSky to instead operate a counter seasonal route, to a destination like Thailand
- HiSky definitely has a cost advantage in terms of flying an older A330 that’s probably not too expensive to lease, and I imagine the carrier has much better labor costs than US airlines (I doubt HiSky captains are making $400K+ per year)
I’m very curious to see how this evolves, as it’s always fun to see new airlines trying long haul routes (even if it often doesn’t end well). I think the summer service will do fine, but I have to imagine the airline will backtrack on winter service.
Now I’m just trying to decide if I should take this flight for review purposes. On the one hand, it seems like a fun opportunity to try something new. On the other hand, this is exceptionally niche…
Bottom line
HiSky will launch nonstop flights from Romania to the United States in the coming weeks. Specifically, the airline will fly from Bucharest to New York with a newly acquired Airbus A330 that used to fly for Sichuan Airlines.
I’ve gotta say, this is an interesting new route. It’s a European destination not currently served by any US airline, so that’s fun. While I think the summer service will do reasonably well, I’m skeptical of the concept of this route also operating in winter, given how challenging that can be across the Atlantic.
What do you make of HiSky’s new Bucharest to New York flight?
I have flown with HiSky from Bukarest to New York City. Booking was easy. Costs were low. The flight was on time. Flight attendants barely spoke English and were unfriendly. Food was not good, air temperature far too high. Nevertheless, I will book again.
They're now occurring connecting flights on a single ticket between NY and other destinations. That should help them.
The route will make sense in the winter too: This flight’s catchment area is all of Romania plus Moldova, plus (one should not forget) some of Ukraine, some Bulgaria and Serbia as well. It’s a point-to-point, which is what most people take around here (Wizz and Ryan being the largest airlines in the area) and at a cost that makes sense. HiSky is seen as reliable and friendly (for example on TSR-OTP they are regularly...
The route will make sense in the winter too: This flight’s catchment area is all of Romania plus Moldova, plus (one should not forget) some of Ukraine, some Bulgaria and Serbia as well. It’s a point-to-point, which is what most people take around here (Wizz and Ryan being the largest airlines in the area) and at a cost that makes sense. HiSky is seen as reliable and friendly (for example on TSR-OTP they are regularly on time as opposed to the RO flights which are not), and a good deal.
Also factor that if the US drops the visa requirement for Romanian citizens (which includes a lot of Moldova-based ones), and I am sure hisky planners thought of this, the flights will be packed to the last place.
There are connecting flights from other airports to JFK via OTP and vice versa with very reasonable layovers.
For W24/5, they didn't load yet their entire flight schedule - it will happen soon, delayed due to plans to launch Canada route, too.
Regarding the operation of this long haul route with only one aircraft, let's remember how Air Serbia did it successfully for so many years with a lone A330. Also, HYS plans to lease the 2nd A330.
just a thought : I think he was a genius who ever came up with this airline name. I think is the best I heard in many years. HIsky
Damn! I thought it rhymed with whisky :(
I flew few times with them in Europe . The service is great, they have great cabin crews .I can't complain, about anything. To give an example if some low cost airline pay great attention to your trolley(size and weight) they are very chill about it. I would fly with them to New York without hesitation. But this is because on my travels I always book last minute. I don t think I would have...
I flew few times with them in Europe . The service is great, they have great cabin crews .I can't complain, about anything. To give an example if some low cost airline pay great attention to your trolley(size and weight) they are very chill about it. I would fly with them to New York without hesitation. But this is because on my travels I always book last minute. I don t think I would have the courage to book 3 month in advance with them, The main reason is that is only one aircraft available .I wish them all the luck in the world but I think will be very hard to keep a tight schedule, so I am expecting hi delays. On the other side, i don t think that you have many options where u can take a ten hours flight under 500$.
Romanian reader here. A few observations.
1) In the past, Delta couldn't make this route (Bucharest - NYC) work. Tarom, the national Romanian carrier, also failed.
2) The lack of US domestic partners is a huge downside. I live in Boston, and I travel quite often to Bucharest. I wouldn't even consider flying HiSky, even though I could, if I absolutely had to, get from Boston to JFK in a few hours. It would...
Romanian reader here. A few observations.
1) In the past, Delta couldn't make this route (Bucharest - NYC) work. Tarom, the national Romanian carrier, also failed.
2) The lack of US domestic partners is a huge downside. I live in Boston, and I travel quite often to Bucharest. I wouldn't even consider flying HiSky, even though I could, if I absolutely had to, get from Boston to JFK in a few hours. It would be way too inconvenient, and the price difference would not justify it.
3) As mentioned in the article, any issues with HiSky's long haul plane will result in a massive headache for the passengers. And I'm afraid that HiSky may not even offer alternative options, since that could be much too expensive for them.
I give this route at most one year, before it will be abandoned again.
Romania is one of the few EU nations without visa on arrival rights in the US, which may reduce traffic (and demand) somewhat. However, it is said that the visa rules may soon change so that may help.
Ben, I recall you did reviews of some Romanian venues (including a roadtrip) a few years back. Perhaps time for a refresh?
Visa on arrival doesn't exist in the USA. It's either visa in advance or ESTA. Most of the EU just needs ESTA but Romanians need visa. But I think that's besides the point, this will be focusing on Romanian expats in the US, which is also why it is designed to be a year round service, not just a seasonal summer service for holiday makers.
Does HiSky have any interlining agreements to protect pax in case of tech troubles with its lone A330?
So... O/D traffic only, no feed on the US side nor beyond-OTP conx on the other side, one lone aircraft in service 18 hours per day ... sounds like a real high-wire act.
.... and what good would an Interline agreement do in that case?
Interlining has NOTHING really to do with the breakdown of a plane of a certain airline.
It's meant for connecting traffic and crediting a flight sold by 1 airline but connecting to another "INTERLINE" partner airline, but still sold on airline 1. Even if airlines have interline agreements, that des NOT mean, that you are guaranteed to be transported.
In...
.... and what good would an Interline agreement do in that case?
Interlining has NOTHING really to do with the breakdown of a plane of a certain airline.
It's meant for connecting traffic and crediting a flight sold by 1 airline but connecting to another "INTERLINE" partner airline, but still sold on airline 1. Even if airlines have interline agreements, that des NOT mean, that you are guaranteed to be transported.
In such cases as you're worried about, there is airlines out there who do sub-charter!
Interlining is a totally different subject! ;-)
HiSky offers a fairly low-cost option to connect to Tel Aviv and Moldova! It's not a point-to-point carrier.
TRUE.
.... BUT, be careful with connecting traffic as TLV is only served in the summer and connecting times are not always met so you could cont. straight to/from the JFK flight! might need a layover of 1 day in OTP.
HiSky often connects cities via OTP "AND" RMO to reach your destination, that makes flights a VERY long trip to fly 1000 Miles.
Be careful when booking!
Connections are probably...
TRUE.
.... BUT, be careful with connecting traffic as TLV is only served in the summer and connecting times are not always met so you could cont. straight to/from the JFK flight! might need a layover of 1 day in OTP.
HiSky often connects cities via OTP "AND" RMO to reach your destination, that makes flights a VERY long trip to fly 1000 Miles.
Be careful when booking!
Connections are probably the reason why Ben did not find any connecting flights other then point to point.