Delta Flight Attendant Fired After Israel Missile Attack Flight… Now He’s Suing

A former Delta Air Lines flight attendant has filed a lawsuit against the airline, claiming the company retaliated against him following some concerns he had after working a flight to Israel, which got very close to a missile attack. This is an interesting case, as there’s a bit more to the story than you might assume (thanks to PYOK for flagging this)…

A Delta flight attendant’s scary Tel Aviv trip in May 2025

For all airlines other than EL AL, air service to and from Israel has been pretty inconsistent in recent years, given safety considerations. While US carriers like Delta and United have been trying to serve the country, that hasn’t been consistently possible.

That brings us to an incident on May 4, 2025, where a Delta flight from New York (JFK) to Tel Aviv (TLV) was landing in Israel while the country was being attacked by ballistic missiles. While the country’s air defense systems were activated, one missile still made it through, and struck near the airport. The Delta flight was one of the closest to the attack, and the pilots of the flight even reportedly recorded a video with the missiles flying overhead.

Upon landing, the crew was rushed into a bomb shelter, where they stayed for around two hours. I can definitely understand how this must have been distressing for the people involved.

Given what happened, Delta decided to deadhead the entire crew back to New York immediately, meaning they would fly back as passengers on the same aircraft. This was obviously to get everyone back to the United States safely, and also since the airline ended up suspending the route after that flight.

That brings us to the lawsuit — one of the flight attendants, a 10-year veteran at the airline, wasn’t comfortable boarding a flight right away. He told the carrier’s scheduling department that he was scared for his safety, and was too distressed and fatigued to get on the same plane. He instead wanted to rest in a hotel for the night.

The airline reportedly denied this request, and told him that he’d be on his own for booking a hotel room, transportation, and even a return flight. So he ended up incurring around $3,500 in expenses based on his decision to not return to New York, and he also missed out on some of the pay that the other flight attendants received.

The flight attendant complained to the FAA, only to be fired

With Delta refusing to reimburse the flight attendant for the expenses incurred as a result of the incident, he decided to file a complaint with the Federal Aviation Administration and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

A while later, in August 2025, he was called in for a meeting with the airline. He thought the meeting would be about his reimbursement request. Instead, he learned that he had been suspended. Then just weeks later, he was fired from the company.

Delta claimed he was being terminated for failing to follow safety protocols, failing to demonstrate respect and professionalism toward leadership, actions jeopardizing safety and cohesion of the crew, and lack of cooperation with leadership during a security debrief of a serious incident.

The flight attendant argues that the airline was simply retaliating against him due to his complaint with the FAA and EEOC, and claims that it was also motivated by racial discrimination.

My take on this lawsuit by a former Delta flight attendant

I don’t doubt that this situation was traumatic for a flight attendant, especially if you’re not from Israel, where you might be more used to sirens, bomb shelters, etc. Now, my gut tells me that if I were in his situation and were scared, I’d want to get out ASAP, rather than spending a night there to rest.

The thing is, when we’re talking about a big company, it doesn’t seem unreasonable that the company would make some sort of a security assessment and tell employees what they need to do, rather than basically telling everyone “do whatever you want, and we’ll cover the costs.”

I think that filing complaints with regulators when you’re a flight attendant at a non-unionized airline generally isn’t a best practice, so I can’t say that I’m surprised things headed in the direction than they did. Not having a union of course doesn’t make retaliation okay, but it definitely makes it easier to take action against an employee if you feel they’ve violated policies.

Then again, who knows, maybe this will end up in the flight attendant’s favor. It’ll be interesting to see if this goes to court, if it’s dismissed, or if Delta settles. I suspect that at least officially, Delta’s policies back the company, in terms of employees having to follow official risk assessments. That’s not to say that there couldn’t be a settlement, though…

Bottom line

A Delta flight attendant found himself working a New York to Tel Aviv flight that got very close to a missile attack. The entire crew had to go into a bomb shelter, and was then told to deadhead right back to New York.

One flight attendant wasn’t comfortable doing that, and said he wanted to stay in a hotel. The company refused, and said that if he did that, he’d be on his own. He wasn’t happy with that solution, so he ended up filing complaints with government agencies, only to then be fired.

Delta claims he violated very specific rules, while the flight attendant claims the airline retaliated against him, and the actions were even motivated by racial discrimination.

What do you make of this Delta lawsuit?