Every summer, we see the global US carriers announce new routes to Europe, given the amount of seasonal leisure demand that exists. Along those lines, Delta has just announced two new transatlantic flights for 2026, from one of its growing long haul hubs.
In this post:
Delta adding two new Europe routes from Boston
Delta has announced that it plans to add two new summer seasonal long haul routes from Boston Logan (BOS) as of the summer 2026 season:
- As of May 16, 2026, Delta will fly daily to Madrid (MAD)
- As of May 17, 2026, Delta will fly 3x weekly to Nice (NCE)
The routes will cover 3,410 miles and 3,807 miles, respectively. The schedules for the routes haven’t yet been revealed, but I’ll be sure to provide an update once we learn more. Separately, Delta has also revealed that it will increase frequencies next summer on its route from Boston to Barcelona (BCN) — rather than operating 3x weekly, it’ll instead operate daily.
Both routes will be operated by Airbus A330-900neos, featuring 281 seats, including 29 business class (Delta One) seats, 28 premium economy (Premium Select) seats, 56 extra legroom economy (Comfort+) seats, and 168 economy (Main Cabin) seats.
Here’s how Paul Baldoni, Delta’s SVP of Network Planning, describes these additions:
“As Boston’s leading airline, Delta plays a vital role in connecting the city to the world. By adding nonstop service to Madrid and Nice, we’re enhancing our European network and continuing our commitment to providing an exceptional travel experience from start to finish.”
“As a cornerstone of Delta’s global network, Boston plays a vital role in connecting our customers to the world. By adding nonstop service to Madrid and Nice, we’re enhancing our European network and continuing our commitment to providing an exceptional travel experience from start to finish.”
Delta will serve 12 European destinations from Boston
It’s cool to see Delta’s continued European expansion, given that the only other US carrier operating any meaningful long haul service from there is JetBlue.
With these latest route additions, Delta will serve a total of a dozen European destinations out of Boston next summer. These include Amsterdam (AMS), Athens (ATH), Barcelona (BCN), Dublin (DUB), Edinburgh (EDI), Lisbon (LIS), London (LHR), Madrid (MAD), Milan (MXP), Nice (NCE), Paris (CDG), and Rome (FCO). That’s quite an impressive network… and that small Delta One Lounge Boston is about to be very crowded!
These are among Delta’s first new European route announcements for 2026. So far, the airline has only otherwise revealed plans to fly from Seattle (SEA) to Barcelona and Rome, and that was clearly a competitive response to Alaska, given the carrier’s growth there.
On top of that, Delta is letting SkyMiles members vote on the carrier’s new European destination, with the choices being Ibiza, Malta, or Sardinia. Something tells me the airline might just announce all three of them, but I guess we’ll see…
Bottom line
Delta has announced two new seasonal European routes from Boston, as the airline will fly to both Madrid and Nice using Airbus A330-900neos. This complements 10 existing destinations, meaning that Delta will serve a total of a dozen European destinations from Boston next summer.
I don’t think there’s anything surprising here — you can’t go wrong with adding service to Spain and France — and Boston seems like a logical gateway out of which to add this service.
What do you make of Delta’s European expansion from Boston?
sometimes it's just fun to watch Tim Dunn lose his mind on this kind of article.
Timmy,
get a life. Your current one is a laughing stock.
Congrats to Delta on new routes. Madrid has their own POS tourism, but Delta is just tragically sad tragically sad trying to connect passengers on Air Europa vs Iberia.
Nice is super fun. Who knew Boston people cared so much about their tans?! (not traffic data)
my mind is fully intact.
YOU are the one that can't stand to sit on the sideline and let someone else "talk"
lordy...
two minute response? I haven't been on all day but you're here on constant refresh.
Is your "wife" real? or just part of your imagination? It's 920p in Atlanta, Timmy? Shouldn't you be satisfying her by now?
I'm starting to think she does not exist...
nor does your "friend"
If she does, jesus... give her some love on a friday night. You're giving Me more love than her on a friday night
You responded back to back in 4 minutes, get off your high horse. You hardly seem stable yourself.
oh hey Tim. Using other usernames again? lol
Boring Friday night for you, as usual? It gets sad how tragic you are.
don't like your own guest comment so quickly next time, Tim?
No, I think everyone just sees your hypocrisy and equally manic responses.
I can hardly wait until I finally reach 1,000,000 Sky Pesos in my account so I can fly BOS-MAD in Coach...
United.
The new Pan Am
Delta.
The new TWA
American.
Hourly service to Pittsburgh.
And most of the time late.
I wouldn't fly anything on DL from anywhere, especially from a scum-filled city like Bahstun and especially on a disgusting Airpus. Besides, I already can fly AA from ORD directly on a superior Boeing and not have to touch the Least Coast.
you mean those new 787s that keep having demons raise their ugly heads?
no one will miss you.
Your meds await you
I find it fascinating that DL are opening a route to a major hub of their alliance which can increase the options for their customers wanting to fly to/from numerous destinations in Spain, Europe, and even N. Africa and make no reference whatsoever to those opportunities.
It's one thing to prioritise the JV and the synergies therein, but DL and UX aren't [yet] frienemies that somehow ended up in the same alliance like LH...
I find it fascinating that DL are opening a route to a major hub of their alliance which can increase the options for their customers wanting to fly to/from numerous destinations in Spain, Europe, and even N. Africa and make no reference whatsoever to those opportunities.
It's one thing to prioritise the JV and the synergies therein, but DL and UX aren't [yet] frienemies that somehow ended up in the same alliance like LH and TK did- they have been codesharing for about 15 years and even made an application to the US authorities last year asking for Air Europa Express to be allowed to sell flights under a DL code even to/from destinations outside of the EU.
UX is not a part of the DL JV and so route planning is not done jointly. DL and UX might cooperate more than now but DL and UX have never been particularly close.
Everything in southern Europe is doing very well for US airlines.
BOS is a very strong gateway where DL wants to continue to continue to grow.
No, they won't have been planning the route together, but surely it must make sense for DL to tell the world that the new route may help people wanting to fly to Oviedo, Ibiza, Tunis, or even Orly without needing to make awkward connections involving backtracking at AMS/CDG
Delta neglects long haul international expansion out of LAX.
It's not neglect. They know they can't do longhaul Europe out of LAX.
Delta can't even do LHR, the #1 international destination for LAX, which is flown by every other carrier, UA, AA, BA, and VS. LAX is the only Delta hub that they don't fly LHR or AMS, and they also don't do CDG daily year-round.
Delta launching more Europe flights from LAX, would be asking to lose money, they had 40% load factors the last time they tried LHR
It's not neglect. They know they can't do longhaul Europe out of LAX.
Delta can't even do LHR, the #1 international destination for LAX, which is flown by every other carrier, UA, AA, BA, and VS. LAX is the only Delta hub that they don't fly LHR or AMS, and they also don't do CDG daily year-round.
Delta launching more Europe flights from LAX, would be asking to lose money, they had 40% load factors the last time they tried LHR
it's simple geography and partnerships.
The vast majority of DL's TATL network is on the east coast with a moderate amount from DTW, MSP, SLC and SEA and the least from LAX.
and all 3 of DL's TATL JV partners serve LAX.
with HKG, DL will serve 7 cities across the Pacific from LAX, with SEA at 4, DTW at 3 and MSP and ATL at 2 and SLC at 1.
let's keep in mind that UA doesn't serve 2 cities in Asia from any hub outside of California.
Delta has JV partners at plenty of their other hubs, but that hasn't prevented them from operating these routes.
Delta is uniquely weak to Europe at LAX in a way other airlines aren't.
Delta has chosen not to get into a pi78ng match w/ UA over LAX-Europe.
You do recall that UA added a 2nd LAX-LHR and then pulled it soon after DL pulled its own LAX-LHR
And UA does not have a JV partner in the UK so it has to fly to LHR; it doesn't fly to any JV partner hubs in continental Europe from LAX because, wait, wait, JV partners.
your logic, as usual,...
Delta has chosen not to get into a pi78ng match w/ UA over LAX-Europe.
You do recall that UA added a 2nd LAX-LHR and then pulled it soon after DL pulled its own LAX-LHR
And UA does not have a JV partner in the UK so it has to fly to LHR; it doesn't fly to any JV partner hubs in continental Europe from LAX because, wait, wait, JV partners.
your logic, as usual, fails.
Meanwhile, what matters is LAX across the Pacific.
DL added LAX-BNE, UA dropped it. DL added LAX-AKL, UA dropped it - and don't give me the "but their JV partner flies it"
DL is scheduling LAX-MEL into the summer of 2026.
and DL is adding LAX-HKG and they will almost certainly fly LAX-ICN and SIN in a few years.
Get back w/ us about how strong DL and UA are in LAX and where they are strong and weak in a few years.
According to you, UA flies LAX-LHR because they don't have a JV partner, so they need to.
But then AA also flies LAX-LHR, so your reasoning falls apart. Delta is the only one who can't make it work.
no, your logic falls apart when you say that UA doesn't fly to LH Group hubs because they have a JV partner to do it from LAX but DL is a failure because it lets VS fly LAX-LHR.
which is why markets like LAX-HKG will be fun to watch because neither has a JV partner on the other end. :-)
UA flies daily year-round to LH group hubs from all of its hubs. Delta is the one that can't do that from LAX.
I love seeing DL's aggressive European expansion out of BOS, but worry that they have insufficient connecting opportunities to fill all those gleaming widebodies.
Reference the D1 lounge (in Terminal E), do all DL's international departures depart out of E? I'm thinking many European departures are also leaving out of A.
As an aside, new Terminal A seemed right-sized when first rebuilt (substantially) for DL, and then they diminished their operation there. Nice to see...
I love seeing DL's aggressive European expansion out of BOS, but worry that they have insufficient connecting opportunities to fill all those gleaming widebodies.
Reference the D1 lounge (in Terminal E), do all DL's international departures depart out of E? I'm thinking many European departures are also leaving out of A.
As an aside, new Terminal A seemed right-sized when first rebuilt (substantially) for DL, and then they diminished their operation there. Nice to see a robust DL operation at Logan. Agree that they are creating an east coast "wall".
Smart of delta to be investing where they can win (BOS) instead of trying to chase down Alaska in SEA
Alaska is the one chasing Delta in SEA for longhaul...
THAT is true
Considering the economic weakness predicted for next year, these additions might lead to severe overcapacity.
Overcapacity would be a good thing for travelers, if it leads to reduces cash/award prices. Fingers crossed!
Another destination DL executives have teased recently is Birmingham UK, they have also become the official sponsor of Birmingham City FC.
Perfect for the huge American tourism draw to the West Midlands & the affluent local market coming to the US
glad you picked it up, Ben.
DL clearly sees Europe travel as continuing next year at the same fast pace.
DL is building a very impressive operation in BOS. I suspect part of this is to help justify gaining access to domestic gates on Terminal B. DL is, by far, using its gates at BOS far better than any other airline.
It is also notable that DL is heavily using the 330-900 for BOS...
glad you picked it up, Ben.
DL clearly sees Europe travel as continuing next year at the same fast pace.
DL is building a very impressive operation in BOS. I suspect part of this is to help justify gaining access to domestic gates on Terminal B. DL is, by far, using its gates at BOS far better than any other airline.
It is also notable that DL is heavily using the 330-900 for BOS to Europe.
and DL has built (is building) quite a transatlantic "wall" along the east coast from BOS to JFK to ATL.
DL is probably not through w/ all of their route announcements. Now it is time to see what UA does and how much more, if any AA, announces.
Boston gets NEOs and we're stuck with 76's to Nice out of ATL from the Southeast?
764s, actually.
but keep in mind that a big chunk of DL's largest competitor across the Atlantic is flying 757s to Ireland and all the way to continental Europe.
The 763 seems palatial compared to a 757 with 2X2 seating in business class and only 1/3 of seats w/ an aisle in coach.
we should have a pool as to whether UA's 757s or DL's 763s are taken off the Atlantic first.
To be fair, United uses the 757 either of routes that meet actual demand (SNN and EDI) as opposed to a widebody or provide double dailies until the backlogged widebodies arrive (DUBIAD against another narrowbody carrier, Aer Lingus). Their network planners are admirable with innovation and profit while being nimble with delivery delays. I love Delta’s BOS network and ability to retain a great hub carrier and a great collection of foreign carriers. Kudos to...
To be fair, United uses the 757 either of routes that meet actual demand (SNN and EDI) as opposed to a widebody or provide double dailies until the backlogged widebodies arrive (DUBIAD against another narrowbody carrier, Aer Lingus). Their network planners are admirable with innovation and profit while being nimble with delivery delays. I love Delta’s BOS network and ability to retain a great hub carrier and a great collection of foreign carriers. Kudos to Delta. (Nice frequency is perfect, BCN may be ambitious… but also strategic)
DL flies 767s to destinations where UA uses 757s so it isn't about the market not being large enough, esp. if UA has 2X daily 757s on some routes.
and twice as many seats on the 757 still is a lower quality product than even DL's 767-300ER no matter how you slice it. Considering how many DL 767 destinations are also served by UA 757s proves my point that DL does use the 767 where...
DL flies 767s to destinations where UA uses 757s so it isn't about the market not being large enough, esp. if UA has 2X daily 757s on some routes.
and twice as many seats on the 757 still is a lower quality product than even DL's 767-300ER no matter how you slice it. Considering how many DL 767 destinations are also served by UA 757s proves my point that DL does use the 767 where it competitively makes sense to do so.
and CO used the 757s extensively to Europe from the time they were acquired. Yes, UA thought it would have much larger numbers of new 787s by now but UA has also pushed back its Airbus order multiple times -and it has been proven that Airbus is delivering widebodies to DL on-time.
as noted elsewhere, BCN and FCO are seeing huge amounts of demand including for Med cruises. the fact that DL now (or by next summer) serves NCE from 3 hubs, BCN from 4 etc says alot about the depth of DL's network.
So the greedy planners at DL sees that UA flies their worst plane so they match UA with the worst plane too.
How customer friendly DL is.
it's called competition. DL doesn't want to put UA out of business; just win the competition with them.
and, yeah, a good chunk of DL's 763 flights compete against UA 757s internationally and/or UA's domestic 777s domestically as well as AA's 321Ts that at least some people say are in pretty bad shape in the cabin.
I will go out on a limb that DL will get rid of its 763s before UA pulls its...
it's called competition. DL doesn't want to put UA out of business; just win the competition with them.
and, yeah, a good chunk of DL's 763 flights compete against UA 757s internationally and/or UA's domestic 777s domestically as well as AA's 321Ts that at least some people say are in pretty bad shape in the cabin.
I will go out on a limb that DL will get rid of its 763s before UA pulls its 757s and 777-200s out of service.
and if UA does pull its older aircraft including its 767s, UA will not be growing near as much some people think they will with all of those huge orders. let's see - older uncompetitive old Polaris product or slower growth. which will it be?
Nothing of value here: unless the award saver (or lowest possible dynamic) prices are posted publicly (which they are not).
And if the dynamic saver prices are not competitive with (or even within 150% of) Iberia's 40.5k Avios J, then it might as well not exist in my world. Just like the half empty Delta planes to Taipei.
If the J prices end up matching Iberia Avios pricing, I will eat my shoe.
Why make up facts? Delta has averaged over 87% loads on the TPE route in all of 2025 from Jan to July.
They are not "half empty" like you claim.