Not So Fast: Has Chicago Overtaken Atlanta As Country’s Busiest Airport?

There are a lot of headlines right now about how Chicago O’Hare (ORD) has become the busiest airport in the United States, overtaking Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta (ATL). That’s interesting, because Atlanta has for years not only been the busiest airport in the country, but also the busiest airport in the world. So what has really happened here? Are the Windy City’s claims accurate?

“Chicago O’Hare crowned America’s busiest airfield”

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has issued a press release, declaring Chicago O’Hare the busiest airfield in the United States:

  • In 2025, the airport saw 857,392 takeoffs and landings, more than any other airport in the country
  • As a point of comparison, in 2024, the airport had 776,036 takeoffs and landings, meaning traffic grew around 10% year-over-year, which is impressive

How far ahead of Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta was Chicago O’Hare?

  • In 2025, the airport saw 807,625 takeoffs and landings, meaning Chicago saw around 6% more movements than Atlanta
  • As a point of comparison, in 2024, the airport had 796,224 takeoffs and landings, meaning traffic grew only a little over 1% year-over-year, which isn’t so impressive

For what it’s worth, by this metric, the other top five airports in the country were Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW), Denver (DEN), and Las Vegas (LAS).

Here’s how Mayor Johnson describes this achievement for Chicago:

“This is more than a statistic, it’s a statement about Chicago’s momentum. From the runways of O’Hare to the neighborhoods across our city, Chicago is building, growing, and leading. We are open for business, open to the world, and once again setting the pace for the nation.” 

O’Hare is now the busiest airport, by some metric

Has Chicago really overtaken Atlanta? Not quite…

The Chicago Mayor is technically correct — Chicago O’Hare has become the busiest airfield, which is to say that it has the most aircraft movements. What’s interesting is how the media at large has picked up on this. Most stories suggest that Chicago now has the busiest airport in the country, but that’s not using the traditional metrics.

If you look at data from OAG, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta had 63.1 million departing seats in 2025, compared to Chicago O’Hare’s 50.6 million seats. By that metric, Atlanta has the world’s busiest airport, while Chicago has the world’s eighth busiest airport, and the difference in traffic between the airports is around 25%.

So what gives here? How can there be such a big difference between the number of seats and the number of takeoffs and landings? It’s quite simple — the average aircraft size in Atlanta is way bigger than in Chicago:

  • Chicago O’Hare is a massive regional jet market, given that you have both American and United competing, with so many frequencies served by regional jets
  • Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta is a fortress hub for Delta, so the airline largely flies big, mainline aircraft to the airport, rather than smaller regional jets
  • I imagine that cargo and private jet operations are also a factor here, but not quite as much as the general difference in terms of passenger aircraft size

There’s no right or wrong way to define a “busy” airport. If you’re worried about whether the taxiway will be congested, then total number of movements is important (and gosh, O’Hare taxiway situation has sucked for a very long time).

Meanwhile if you’re worried about the terminal being crowded, then total number of passengers is important. By Chicago’s metrics of “busy,” Dubai would be considered a rather quiet airport, given that the average plane there is massive (Emirates has an all wide body fleet). That means the airport sees a ton of passengers, but not that many aircraft takeoffs and landings.

Anyway, with American and United competing so fiercely in Chicago, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Chicago narrow the gap on Atlanta a bit in 2026, but I wouldn’t expect passenger numbers in Chicago to exceed those in Atlanta.

O’Hare has a lot of regional jets, so expect congested taxiways!

Bottom line

Chicago O’Hare claims to now be the busiest airfield in the country. That’s true, which is to say that the airfield sees the most takeoffs and landings. What’s not quite true is how it’s widely being reported that Chicago O’Hare has overtaken Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta as the world’s busiest airport, if we’re measuring by passenger numbers (which is typically what people care about).

So while Chicago saw 6% more aircraft movements in 2025, Atlanta still saw around 25% more passengers. This comes down to the average aircraft size being much bigger in Atlanta… it’s that simple.

What do you make of this Atlanta vs. Chicago size battle?

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tyler Forsyth Guest

O’hate is literally one of the world’s worst airports in the world with two of the worst airlines in the world.. if you want to see a world class airport ran right, smoothly, plenty of restaurants, seating and so easy to navigate, you will find that at THE WORLD’S BUSIEST AIRPORT…. ATLANTA with the best, Delta airlines!

0
‼ 0
JJ Guest

I think ORD should take the cake. Aircraft movements are a lot more difficult than passenger count IMO.

0
‼ 0
Lune Diamond

There are lots of ways that an airport can be deemed busiest. As far as statistics that are actually useful for a traveler, I think neither most passengers nor most flights is all that useful. For me, the two biggest are most connected (i.e. how many unique non-stop destinations can I reach by at least daily frequency), and least average CASM. I don't know about the latter, but ORD typically ranks pretty high on connectivity. That said, between most passengers and most flights, I actually think most flights is the better metric for passengers. Most people don't buy tickets based on aircraft type. They buy it based on price and schedule. All those regional jets do have a purpose besides hogging gates: there are a lot of small and even mid-sized towns for which it's far better to run 2-3 regional jets daily rather than a single 737. Even for myself, I'd rather connect through an airport that has multiple flights to my final destination, even if they're RJs, than one single large aircraft. That way, I have more flexibility in choosing convenient timings, and if there are any delays on my first leg, I have a much better shot at still reaching my destination rather than spending the night at the layover airport. The choice is usually not 5 daily RJs from ORD vs 5 737s from ATL. It's more like 5 RJs from ORD vs 3 737s from ATL. The former gives passengers (both O&D and connecting) much more advantage than the latter. Who cares how many pax you're sharing the flight with? It's not like domestic narrowbodies have lie flat seats and bars in the back. Heck, some of the regional jets are actually more comfortable than domestic 737s and A32x.

0
‼ 0
Jessica Guest

Crazy Brandon Jackson is a total dummy. This is complexity untrue and Chicago maintains it post as forth busiest airport in. The contiguous united states.

0
‼ 0
GetToThePoints Guest

Living in the ATL region nobody wants to fight the traffic trying to get to the airport. And with the Delta stranglehold on ATL nobody wants to pay their fares. So, they opt for smaller airports with feeders to elsewhere. Even if you connect via Delta through ATL their schedules are not great and layovers excessively long. They need to work on their feeder schedules. I opt to go through DFW or ORD or even the dreaded CLT from a smaller airport near me.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published