United Is Adding 23...
 

United Is Adding 23-25 Seats To Their Reconfigured 777-200s

18 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
186 Views
Posts: 39916
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#6722]
wpf-cross-image

United is in the process of introducing their new Polaris business class hard product throughout their longhaul fleet. This product debuted on United's 777-300ERs, as all of those planes were delivered with the new seats. Meanwhile United has also slowly begun reconfiguring their Boeing 767-300s with the new seats. Interestingly United's reconfigured 767-300s feature just…

Continue reading: United Is Adding 23-25 Seats To Their Reconfigured 777-200s

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


17 Replies
17 Replies
 Alec
(@Alec)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 120

I wonder why they didn't introduce premium economy. I imagine they're going to be regretting it soon...unless it's a flop on American and Delta, which i doubt. May be a benefit for United flyers though if the others stop upgrades from economy to business and only PE to business.


Reply
(@bobby)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 89

Also, hasn't Delta stated that their 777s will remain at 9 across in economy? (And not that god awful tight 10 across).


Reply
(@echino)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 296

That is because their new business seats are really 8-across, similar to BA. Not 4-across.


Reply
(@Davis)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 124

Delta is reconfiguring their 777s with 28 business; they currently have 37 seats.


Reply
 Rjb
(@Rjb)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 177

I actively avoid 10 wide on a 777. Just too tight. Unfortunately not too many options left.


Reply
(@Martin)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 330

echino, that are and they are not. The staggered configuration on Polaris means that the 8 seats are not in a line, and so there is actually more real estate per seat. And of course the all-important direct aisle access.

But it's nothing like the 1-2-1 or 2-2-2 that we see on airlines that are not Anglo-Saxon.

I suspect it is the soft product that UAL will struggle to maintain


Reply
(@Alexander)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 20

@ Alec - I wonder the same. Premium economy is becoming more popular and produces extra revenue. It’s strange.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 15

Just looked at my DEN-LAX flight next weekend and saw it's on a 10-seat across 777....FML...and here I was actually happy to get a 777....


Reply
(@anne-k)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

New boarding process to be introduced! You forgot to add that!
Upon enter the plane you will be greeted by a smiling FA equipped with a shoe horn and they will squeeze you into your seat!


Reply
(@Christian)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 844

@Rjb +1


Reply
(@RaflW)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 35

As the citizens (Ok, me included) keep getting wider, the seats keep getting narrower. There will be a breaking point. And frankly, UA deciding not to do PE means mine is here with UA. I already had no interest in their 787. Add their 777 to that.
I just hope over time that the mix of AA, DL and overseas carriers can offer me P.E. at fares I'll accept, and kiss the 17" econ seat goodbye.


Reply
(@Nicolas Noble)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 35

Lucky do you know which airline was the first to try 10 across on a 777?
Maybe we should boycott that airline.
There is just no room in the aisle on those flights.


Reply
Diamond
(@kerry)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 405

@Alec, @Alexander

Totally agree I am stunned they appear to be positioning as the only major international carrier anywhere not to have a PE product on long haul flights.

The airlines with the best PE products (interestingly BA probably leads the pack here along with CX, JL and Virgin) have had a lot of success filling seats. Personally it’s become my default if I can’t get mileage upgrade/don’t feel like paying for biz. I know anecdotally a lot of frequent flyers who feel the same. Yet another reason to avoid UA...


Reply
 Paul
(@Paul)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 37

United really needs to have premium economy if they're going to stick 3-4-3 in economy. Who wants to fly in that?


Reply
(@gottafly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@kerry Personally I find BA Premium Eco to be pretty meh, Virgin Aus/Uk and JAL are definitely the best.


Reply
(@Helen)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

United just switched my aircraft to this configuration - day before our transatlantic flight. So rather than a 2 window/aisle in economy and premium economy we now only have a choice of 3-4-3. It's going to feel very tight and claustrophobic. I am fed up of United constantly changing the timing and configuration of flights. This adding an extra seat in economy is the last straw. I will now actively avoid flying United economy unless using up my frequent flyer miles.
Last summer I had the opportunity to fly Virgin Atlantic Premium Economy transatlantic and I was blown away by how good this experience was versus regular economy or United's premium economy (which is really just a few inches more leg room).


Reply
(@AndrewB)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

I've been a hugely loyal United customer for 23 years, based in London. Mainly LHR-SFO-LHR two to three times a year.

There are two reasons why I'm switching my airline:

1. Adding another seat per row on the 777-200 really sucks.
2. You can NEVER EVER spend your miles. For the past four years, I've been looking at using them to get 4 x business class seats to various US destinations from London. Even looking 11 months in advance, the maximum you are capable of on their web site, its IMPOSSIBLE to find 4 seats that you can use miles to book. IMPOSSIBLE. What is the point of a loyalty program like this?

I'm switching to Norwegian for transatlantic travel. Their premium economy into SF is cheaper than United's basic economy fare. They also give you cash-back on every flight booked, so you can use it on your next flight. Oh yes, they use Dreamliners too on the LGW to Oakland (moving to SFO) run this summer. Much nicer.

Bye bye United. You failed me too many times.


Reply