Big Singapore Airli...
 

Big Singapore Airlines Announcement Coming -- Here Are Some Clues

60 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
474 Views
Posts: 39789
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#4575]
wpf-cross-image

Earlier today, Singapore Airlines posted a rather mysterious puzzle to their @singaporeair Instagram account: That seems like a rather unique way to generate buzz. It's a math equation, and the answer is 24. The other clue is that the caption for the post is the following: "Coming, months earlier. #FlySQ #SingaporeAir" Okay, so it seems…

Continue reading: Big Singapore Airlines Announcement Coming — Here Are Some Clues

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


59 Replies
59 Replies
Diamond
(@ivany)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Well, it's pretty clear that the date is switching from 2018 to 2018 and it involves 350. Furthermore the formula result is 24 so, basically, something related to A350 is happening 24 months earlier 🙂


Reply
(@Tom Brady)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 10

Service to LAX. 24=Kobe=LAX


Reply
 Woj
(@Woj)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 7

Correct answer is 25


Reply
Gold
(@gringoloco)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

They're going revenue-based like AS?


Reply
(@James S)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 59

Yup... most likely they're moving up the launch of nonstop SIN-LAX service.


Reply
 Woj
(@Woj)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 7

So SQ25 (SIN-FRA-JFK) going non-stop?


Reply
(@Flyingdoctorwu)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 124

Maybe they'll absorb some of Scoots 787s and start a non stop US flight?

Fdw


Reply
(@Andrey)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 9

How did you guys ever graduate? 😀 This is basic arithmetics and the correct answer is NINE, not 24 or 25.

Here's the breakdown for the especially gifted: (2+0+6)*(2+0+1/8)+(3*5+0)-(2+0+6) = 8*2 1/8 + 15 - 8 = 2+15-8 = 9.


Reply
 Woj
(@Woj)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 7

Oh actually it's 24, what about SQ24 (discontinued SIN-AMS-EWR service)


Reply
Diamond
(@ivany)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ Andrey -- it's (8) * (17/8) + (15) - (8) = 24


Reply
 Ted
(@Ted)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 21

=24...


Reply
(@nolan-snoeyink)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Well, LAX-SIN is only 7621nm, and with the the A359's range of 8100nm, it should be doable. I'm guessing that's why 350 is in the equation, as well as 2016 (launch year of non-stop LAX services), and 2018 (launch year of non-stop JFK services). And if something is happening 24 months earlier? LAX. Non-stop. That's it.


Reply
(@Andrey)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 9

@Ivan holy shit that's a giant stinky foot I put in my mouth 😀 Thanks for keeping me in check!


Reply
 Mo
(@Mo)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 89

(2+0+1*6)(2+0+1/8)+(3*5+0)-(2+0*1+6) = Half Life 3 CONFIRMED!


Reply
 Kris
(@Kris)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 194

They're butthurt that United beat them to nonstop service and are going to launch heavily load restricted flights to the US later this year. Doubt they will be making money on them so long as they are heavily load limited. But that's the price of pride.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2

Get your calculations right !!! = 8 X 17/8 + 15 - 8 = 17 + 15 - 8 = 24


Reply
(@Graf Zahl)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

@ Andrey: I really hope you're just joking (even though I don't get the joke). Otherwise -- omg, how embarrassing...


Reply
(@dubyadubyadubya)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

Andrey, you are a true genius in basic "arithmetics."


Reply
(@Flyingdoctorwu)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 124

Oops I didn't read the equation well enough. Definitely not 787s...


Reply
(@Andrey)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 9

@Graf nope, not joking sadly, and yes, very embarrassing - kind folks above already corrected me.


Reply
(@nolan-snoeyink)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ Andrey How did YOU ever graduate? I haven't graduated. And I'm right. You're wrong... order of operations, my friend!

Let's break it down.

(2+0+1*6)(2+0+(1/8))

1*6=6, so the first group = 8.
1/8 = .125, so .125+2=2.125

Multiply the first two groups together: 8*2.125=17

So now we have: 17+(3*5+0)-(2+0*1+6)=x

3*5=15, and we add 0, and it's still 15, so now our equation looks like this: 17+15-(2+0*1+6)=x

0*1=0, so we add that to our 2+6, which is = to 8.

So now we've finally gotten to: 17+15-8, which is equal to, wait for it, 24!
Hopefully that makes some sense.


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 12

2016 or 2018, A 350, 2016!


Reply
 KCM
(@KCM)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 14

They're pretty obviously going for "24" since the choice of numbers in the equation are a cute way of saying they will be using an A350 to move up their plans from 2018 to 2016, as I think someone attempted to note above, but made a typo.


Reply
(@mateusz)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I thank that "24" means they'll announce something on the 24th June...


Reply
(@Glenn Beck)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 17

24 was Kobe Bryant's number. K+O+B+E = 11 + 15 + 2 + 5 = 33.

33 is the number on Rolling Rock Beer. Rolling Rock Beer = (R + R) x B. (R + R) x B = (18 +18) x 2 = 72.

72 = 2 + 5 + 14 + 7 + 8 + 1 + 26 + 9.

2 + 5 + 14 + 7 + 8 + 1 + 26 + 9 = B E N G H A Z I.


Reply
 Eric
(@Eric)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 25

2+4 = 6 (month of June)
June 24 they announce A350 direct service to LAX (Kobe 24 could also tie it nicely)


Reply
(@Jason)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 24

Maybe they mean they'll expire points 24months from earning instead of the current 36 ;p


Reply
 MEOW
(@MEOW)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 147

They are going to scrap the stop on SQ15/16 and go nonstop to rival UA. This has been known internally for a while.


Reply
(@eponymous coward)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 445

SQ's intent is to do USA service with a model that won't show up until 2018.

http://www.ausbt.com.au/singapore-airlines-all-new-business-class-on-long-range-a350

It would be surprising to have a new type show up 24 months early...


Reply
(@pointer)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 4

I do not believe it's the A350 2 years early to the USA. If you read a more recent Instagram posting, they replied that they already fly to the USA and this is something different.


Reply
(@lasteve)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Glenn Beck - comment of the day


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 56

Answer=24, but if you consider each component:

(2+0+1 *6)= 2016
(2 + 0 + 1/8) = 2/8= 0.25
(3 * 5 + 0)= A350

So probably nonstop to the NYC area.


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 56

Oops my bad, I meant 2.125. Been years since I took math 😛


Reply
 JT
(@JT)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 8

They are not going to start using a standard a350 to go direct to the US just because of United.

I think I'd rather take SQ with a stopover than fly non stop with United...


Reply
(@Russell)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 2

You don't have to do math!

Look

It just
2016 2018
350-2016

A350 coming in 2016 instead of 2018


Reply
(@Bobby)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 91

No, no, no, no, no. You all have guessed incorrectly. "24" is for the $24 SGD roundtrip airfares between the USA and SIN - in business class, of course.


Reply
(@Angela)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 89

If they are moving up LAX-SIN, and you live in SFO, what would you prefer? Getting yourself to LAX and then taking this flight, or taking one of SQ's one-stops from SFO? I'm not even considering UA, especially before Polaris.


Reply
 ML
(@ML)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 4

They are going to continue the current SIN-AMS A350 flight on to EWR. 24 = old SQ24 EWR-AMS-SIN. 350...2016...24.


Reply
(@AndyNYC)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 2

I believe it is a reference to a flight number, SQ 24, which they may use for their nonstop SIN - EWR run.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 13

SQ is going to announce their new first class product.


Reply
(@TheAnswerIs42Not24)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 11

Lee Harvey Oswald was 24 when he was shot and killed. SQ is going to reveal to us finally who really killed JFK.


Reply
 Tim
(@Tim)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 23

Singapore Chicago Singapore

Star Alliance hub!


Reply
(@Nicander Rizky)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 16

24 is my favourite number. SQ is giving me Solitaire PPS Club for Life!!! #baller #nonsenseonthenet


Reply
 Bill
(@Bill)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 166

The most obvious answer is usually the correct one. I think everyone believe SQ is about to announce a resumption of nonstop service to the USA...most likely SIN-LAX. If they really want to push UA, they could also offer SIN-JFK. If they really want to steal all of UA's Thunder, they could also offer SIN-SFO.


Reply
(@jonny)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

due to pressure from ua, sin usa flight will commence months earlier than planned, still guessing lax/jfk, no way will tailing us to sfo, but, there will be always chance to delay delivery, as 9v-sma, which i missed dearly, 😛


Reply
(@Credit)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 509

24 months or 2 years early.


Reply
(@Prabuddha)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 117

With 24 they are going to have Jack Baur on their flights randomly torturing and killing one passenger each trip.


Reply
(@bostonwalker)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 23

@ Andrey: I showed your calculation to my son who is a second grader, and he laughed his ass off! You made us a day!


Reply
(@ueutyi)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Do all of you even read?

2016 2018 350 2016
what does this suggest?


Reply
(@Thomas)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

I'm a liitle late to this game, but this is how I see it. A little long, but bear with me.
The equation reads, based on the brackets: 2016 2018 350 2018.
The answer to the equation is 24.
The statement says "Coming, months earlier".
So we know that an event that's supposed to happen in 2018, will happen in 2016 - 24 months earlier - and it involves the A350.
It cannot be the non-stop to New York or Los Angeles - SQ specifically ordered the Ultra Long Range A350s to reach those destinations. They don't have these in their fleet now.
Now let's do more maths, shall we? The A350-900 that SQ does have in its current fleet has a range of 7500nmi. If this was to fly to any destination in the US, the distance from Singapore to that destination must fit within 7500nmi. So which US city falls within this range? Hmm, certainly not LAX, or NYC. But how about ... SFO? (7340nmi). Oh and what a coincidence that United had also launched flights from SIN to SFO not that long ago!
And before you ask "What about other US cities within this range?" - unlikely. It doesn't make sense for them to launch a new destination so soon after Dusseldorf. It's a huge investment, and SQ, though not doing badly, is not exactly making billion dollar profits like Emirates.
And going from the past failed attempt of the non-stop flights to LAX and NYC, SQ, being the cautious carrier that it is, is unlikely to launch a major route unless it is sure it has backups to fall on. And guess what - there is the existing backup route of SIN to SFO via HKG.
Guys, SQ is going to launch a non stop A350 flight to SFO. I just know it.


Reply
(@CThadz)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2

New clue posted on the Instagram page seems to suggest SIN-SFO nonstops!


Reply
(@Jordan)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 425

News coming out of Asia. SIN-SFO nonstop using the A350...I would imagine starting soon.


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 25
(@Jeremy)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 5

Hey Lucky,

I'm actually aboard a Singapore flight right now (business class) and asked the lead steward about the announcement. He says they're going to fly the A350 direct to Singapore from both LA and NYC (and still going to operate the A380). That's great news, and I'll be one of the first to sign up. It'll give me a chance to see their new business class product in action and enjoy one really long flight as opposed to two long ones.


Reply
 CRB
(@crb)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

They just posted another teaser on Instagram; kind of makes it obvious that it has something to do with non-stop service to SFO.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BGqunWtmmgv/?taken-by=singaporeair&hl=en


Reply
(@Ravin)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 8
(@ana-fan)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0
(@Kevin)
Joined: 18 years ago

Posts: 41
(@James)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

I saw a Singapore Air A380 at LAX two days ago.


Reply