Qatar Airways A321 ...
 

Qatar Airways A321 Badly Damaged In Fire At Doha Airport

14 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
324 Views
Posts: 39877
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#6987]
wpf-cross-image

This looks pretty bad. Yesterday a Qatar Airways A321 was undergoing maintenance at a remote stand at Doha's Hamad International Airport, and apparently the inflight entertainment satellite antenna caught fire. This was on the A321 with the tail number A7-AIB, which took its first flight in July 2010, so it's still a fairly new plane.…

Continue reading: Ouch: Qatar Airways A321 Badly Damaged In Fire At Doha Airport

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


13 Replies
13 Replies
 Eric
(@Eric)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 5

This reminds me of Swissair 111 where the entertainment system also caught on fire, except that it was inflight


Reply
 H
(@H)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 64

They might be able to remove/reuse the engines, but I think the hull is a write-off...


Reply
 Paul
(@Paul)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 37

Ha! Try telling the insurance company there was just "some damage."


Reply
 Nate
(@Nate)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 295

Its over. The plane is good for parts. Thats it.


Reply
 AJO
(@AJO)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 231

The structural integrity of the hull can no longer be guaranteed, so definitely a write off.


Reply
 Ali
(@Ali)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 3

Second time this has happened to a Qatar Airbus. A7-ABV was damaged the same way.


Reply
(@dan-allen)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Write it off?

I bet you the CEO of delta will buy it, put masking tape on it and paint it to use for Delta flights to Florida


Reply
 Jon
(@Jon)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 108

Frontier will get it in the air


Reply
Gold
(@justin-h)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Common kid it's a write off no doubt about it .


Reply
(@jaxba)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The BA 772 at LAS was repaired after that caught fire and the fuselage had similar damage. It's not impossible, but this does look worse.


Reply
(@Flyingfish)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 285

Not sure if it could have other alternatives other than write-off.


Reply
 J
(@J)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 14

@JAXBA THe BA 772 had much different damage to the aircraft than this instance. Neomax and Prebennorholm on Airliners.net would say otherwise (see it at http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1380679).

Neomax pointed out that the British 777 in Las Vegas had a different story -- because the engine caught fire (not something directly on the fuselage), only exterior panelling, the wing, and the engine needed repairs.

And Prebennorholm added that in this case, they are going to need to rewire everything from above the cabin, completely refurbish the interior, patch the fuselage back up, and ensure that anything below the 2 holes in the fuselage, be it wing box, the remainder of the fuselage, etc., are still working and up to full strength.

This is no Las Vegas, and this is certainly not like the Ethiopian 787 (just compare the damage pictures -- they're nothing alike). It could lean towards a write-off (seeing as there's a large repair bill, the aircraft isn't brand new, etc.), but who knows.


Reply
 SP
(@SP)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 7

This is probably still too new for Delta to be interested, even if it is used and comes cheap. (Sarcasm).


Reply