Update: TSA NOT All...
 

Update: TSA NOT Allowing Full-Size Sunscreen In Carry-Ons

48 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
705 Views
Posts: 40662
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#12097]
wpf-cross-image

Update: Unfortunately the TSA has now clarified that sunscreen in larger quantities isn’t allowed through screening checkpoints. Per a statement from the TSA:

Continue reading: Update: TSA NOT Allowing Full-Size Sunscreen In Carry-Ons

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


47 Replies
47 Replies
Gold
(@donato)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I get the convenience but I am concerned. How long will it take for a group of non peace lovers to collectively bring a dangerous substance on board for terroristic reasons. Will the bottle be swiped or chemically tested every time?


Reply
(@Megan)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 64

How timely... im thinking through packing for a trip and sunscreen was the item making me debate checked vs carry on. This is long overdue.


Reply
(@corpkid)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Yay but I mean why not just rescind the whole liquid restriction?


Reply
(@Franklin)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 135

The US has put forward so many rules that it demanded be enforced internationally. Then it rescinds those rules at home, but no one else ever seems to get the memo on that and keep enforcing policies that never should have existed in the first place.


Reply
Diamond
(@creditcrunch)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 655

LHR are currently installing new 3D scanners too so no more having to remove fluids ( and an end of liquid amounts)laptops and shoes. They hope to have them fully operational by the time travel is back up.


Reply
 Joe
(@Joe)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Lucky - does this only apply to liquid sunscreen? What about the aerosol cans?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40662

@ Joe -- It applies to both.


Reply
(@Can confirm)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 7

Can confirm. Was diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma on my face at 35. Never really took it seriously before then, even living in Florida & being as pasty white complected as they come.

Not wanting to have another chunk carved out of my face anytime soon, I wear sunscreen every. single. day. It literally takes seconds to apply, and an added bonus is that my skin isn't nearly as dry as it used to be!

This is a very welcome change, as my frugality would always force me to seek out a local equivalent of Walmart wherever my travels took me (I simply refuse to pay $10 for a small bottle of sunscreen at a hotel that will literally last me less than a day).


Reply
Diamond
(@sean-m)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1249

This is not entirely a positive development for US travelers. As a result of this exemption, the US will no longer be considered in compliance with ICAO regulations and US origin travelers may have to undergo additional screening at foreign transit points where they are currently exempt.


Reply
(@Zukini)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

@Ben - can you point to the source for this article? As of April 11, 2021, the TSA website is still saying this, which is kind of ambiguous.

Sunscreen
Carry On Bags: Yes (Less than 3.4oz/100 ml allowed)
Checked Bags: Yes
TSA allows larger amounts of medically necessary liquids, gels, and aerosols in reasonable quantities for your trip, but you must declare them to security officers at the checkpoint for inspection.


Reply
Diamond
(@endre)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

And it won't be confusing that no other country e.g. Mexico allowes it. "But but but I was allowed to carry it coming here, why can't you allow me to carry it back? "


Reply
(@Manfred)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

An alternative is to ship the product to your destination, put it in a checked bag, purchase product at your destination.

Who is Ford?


Reply
 R
(@R)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Don’t forget that many countries don’t have the same SS that the US has, I’m talking about the natural, mineral sun screen. The last thing I want is to buy a chemical and harsh sunscreen that hurts the environment and my body.


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40662

@ Manfred -- Ford is my husband. As I said in the post, of course you can check your bag, but often buying sunscreen at your destination is significantly more expensive, and often having sunscreen shipped to a hotel isn't practical.


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40662

@ R -- That's an excellent point that Ford would no doubt second!


Reply
(@Reaper)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 198

Security theater Act 2, Scene 3: The Liquid Restrictions


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40662

@ Sean M -- That's an interesting point, and something I hadn't thought about. I'm curious, though, the TSA previously had exceptions, but has remained ICAO compliant, no? For example, other countries don't necessarily have a hand sanitizer exception, but the US does.


Reply
Diamond
(@bruce-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 92

I don't understand this measure at all. If liquids above 100ml are considered dangerous due to whatever reason, how are they going to make sure that there's nothing dangerous in these sunscreen bottles? Will they open them? If they don't take any extra measures aside from asking the customer to declare it, doesn't it prove that this liquids restrictions is utterly useless and unnecessary?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40662

@ Bruce -- Well, there's no real logic, the whole thing is security theater. It's the same reason that people without Pre-Check can leave their shoes on and keep their laptops in their bags, while others have to take them out.


Reply
 Lou
(@Lou)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Yeah... this is not true. Go to TSA.gov then click on menue "Travel" > "What can I bring", type "Sunscreen" in the search there. It specifically says sunscreen is to be 3.4 or less.

Please place it in your checked bag or purchase at your destination. It will save time for all the travelers behind you having to wait while your bag is checked. God forbid wait for you to explain that you read this exemption in a non government website.


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40662

@ Zukini -- Indeed, you're right, the TSA's website doesn't seem to have been updated yet. Let me try to get an official update on this.


Reply
(@Aaron)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 265

I would argue water is more crucial to life and more "medically necessary" than sunscreen.


Reply
 Avi
(@avi)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 73

Interesting...I just watched them confiscate someones sunscreen spray this morning at TSA!


Reply
 Clem
(@clem)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 455

Thanks for this article! Another news for me reading this is that they allow contact lenses solution in carry on?? I always end up buying the travel sized ones which is a true pain in the butt, but didn't know it qualified as an exception and that you could bring a bigger size. Because now that would be a game changer for me!


Reply
Diamond
(@tortuga)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I wear an oil-free daily sunscreen as I have a widespread family history of skin cancers (we're largely an amalgam of pasty WASPs and Germans). It sounds like you and Ford have a line-item in your budget for it, though. 😉


Reply
(@TheJagMan)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 46

Just bringing some datapoints...
1) I fly often and usually carry on only, I have had fullsize sunscreen on before and its 50/50 if TSA mentions it. I do wonder if the times I got it through it the amount left in the bottle appeared to be around 3.4oz or less (I'm not sure).
2) I have pre-check, on my last three RTs, I have brought hair gel, cologne & toothpaste all under 3.4oz but in my toiletry bag, not in a zip top bag, on all 6 flights, TSA has never stopped me


Reply
(@traveler)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 38

Please-It’s time to rescind the whole liquid restriction!


Reply
 Luke
(@Luke)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 372

While this is a positive change, looks like the basis for it is because 3.4 ounces might now be enough for one trip. But that's based on a single bottle, I don't get that logic when there was never anything stopping someone from taking multiple legal size bottles rather than one!


Reply
Diamond
(@sean-m)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1249

@Ben - like most things, it depends on the interpretation and politics involved. Many countries consider the TSA non-compliant to begin with because of the truck sized hole in policy exempting employees and flight crews from the liquid policy. The UK in particular has a huge issue with the TSA on this issue. So it will depend on whether the receiving country believes that the TSA maintains "equivalent" standards to their domestic screening agency. The likelihood is that those who accepted the crew member liquid policy will accept this too, and those who didn't probably won't accept this either.

Many countries have issued exemptions for hand sanitizer and other sanitary items so that is less critical.


Reply
(@Gary Steiger - FreeFrequentFlyerMiles.com)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 8

I have never needed sun cream inside an airplane.


Reply
Diamond
(@azamaraal)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 744

Vitamin D3 (produced by sunlight on skin) is a requirement for a healthy life.

400 - 1000 IU for adults under 50 and up to 2000 IU for over 50.

Here are the factors that affect how much Vitamin D is absorbed through the skin:

"9 things that can undermine your vitamin D level

The latitude where you live
The air pollution where you live. ...
Your use of sunscreen — in theory. ...
The color of your skin. ...
The temperature of your skin. ...
Your weight. ...
Your age. ...
The health of your gut."

There is definitely a balancing act between excessive sun screen and vitamin D absorption.

Living in Florida you may have enough vitamin D getting through the sun screen.

Living in Canada the recommendation is that vitamin D supplements are needed every day of the year even when the sun is shining. (this is a bit silly for most of Canada).


Reply
Diamond
(@leigh)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 235

Hi folks, as has been raised, it’s also good to use environmentally friendly sunscreen in general, and especially in sensitive/endangered marine sites like the Great Barrier Reef, or any reef system.

Found a link to some recommended sunscreens good for both you and the oceans:

https://ecowarriorprincess.net/2019/03/11-eco-friendly-ocean-friendly-coral-reef-safe-sunscreens/

It may not be comprehensive, but it’s a starting point, and a reminder to look for similar products no matter where you live in the world.

And this is coincidental timing for me, as I just flew to a sunny destination on Friday, but purposely left the sunscreen behind because I didn’t want to check my bag (!).


Reply
(@pstm91)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 834

I've always just brought multiple of the travel sized creams and that usually covered me. The annoying part was carrying multiple bottles instead of one larger one. Better than shelling out for a bottle at a resort, which as you mention they charge an arm and a leg for (not just Maldives, literally anywhere). This is good news but all of the comments here so far are very valid and it will be interesting to see how it's addressed.

@TheJagMan I don't think I've ever put liquids (travel sized) into zip lock bags and I've also never been stopped. I'm pre-check too but I've always just assumed it was because they were clearly travel sized? Who knows with TSA...


Reply
Gold
(@donato)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@TheJagMan
To the best of my understanding the TSA rules concern the volume of the container, not the actual contents. There are actual reasons for this.


Reply
(@schar)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 886

next thing to abolish: the imperial system. USA, please get with the rest of the world and get rid of OuNcEs and use ML like everyone else pls 🙂


Reply
Gold
(@janet-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

As a survivor of melanoma in my 40s - and I never lie on the beach - this is great news, as I wear my sunscreen religiously.


Reply
 Jeff
(@Jeff)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 50

This is great news for me. I've had several moles removed over the years, which alone has had me concerned I was higher risk for skin cancer. Now, add in the fact that my mother has had several biopsies in the past year and a few have been found to be cancerous, and I'm even more aware of needing to use sunscreen.

Now that I'm moving to Florida and plan on spending a lot more time on the golf course, I'll be wearing more sunscreen. When I fly down to SoFla every now and then on the weekends though, it will be nice to be able to just throw a bottle of sunscreen in my carry on and not have to worry about checking it or buying it at the destination.


Reply
 Dave
(@Dave)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Someone needs to tell TSA at MCO. My daughter and I flew out of MCO on April 8 and she accidentally put a brand new bottle of Sunscreen in her carry on. TSA inspected her bag and wouldn't let her carry it on so we had to throw it out. Another example of a useless government agency.


Reply
(@Andreas)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 90

Shows how silly the LAG rule is. When will TSA approve bringing shampoo, shower gel, beauty products and soft cheese for my emotional support peacock?


Reply
Diamond
(@frank-b)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 153

@Peter, I put my liquids into bags more to prevent them from spilling and ruining my clothes more than the TSA.


Reply
(@Cindy)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

Nope, not at DFW. April 12, 2021, and just went through security. Took the sunscreen out and he said “what’s this?” I said, “sunscreen, it was just approved to take more than 3.4oz.” He shook his head and said no. This is posted on so many websites, but be prepared to get it taken away. I’m not sure if TSA has not informed their employees or this is just not true.


Reply
 tim
(@tim)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 30

Article is false. FAKE NEWS!

LAS TSA supervisors rejected and asked me to show them proof thay was NOT media or blogger. They said they been briefed on this.

They referred me to https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/items/sunscreen
which clearly says 3.4oz

The TSA website had a small change that simply re emphasises some medically necessary items can still be brought

I WAS given the option to declare as medically necessary but they tried to convince me not to. They warned of a long item-by-item complete unpack and check of all our carry on items which they would need to touch, plus a very thorough pat down search. All while 2 officers stood 2 inches from me.

In the end, my "contactless" TSA Pre experience took 10 minutes extra while the rest of our group took under a minute.

Also thought I would mention we have tried to get a prescription for OTC sunscreen, but only two types are approved which if I recall correculy are more of a solution with an additional medication, only prescribed for certain conditions.


Reply
 Rose
(@Rose)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

I work for TSA and this is a false statement. Sunscreen is not medically exempt because it is not medically necessary on a flight. Medically exempt liquids are ONLY for what is required during a flight. There is not sun on your plane. So therefore, if you want your sunscreen, check it in


Reply
(@Rebecca Simonitch)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 1

STUPID, Unless the Sunscreen is Hawaii Compliant ( Reef Friendly, Coral Safe) which It will NOT be. It is going to destroy our Oceans.
American thoughtlessness working overtime again.
STUPIDITY rules again.


Reply
 Sam
(@Sam)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 543

In the last 2 wks i've passed through MUC, CDG, AMS, NBO and MBA and went through with my 500ml bottle of water without anyone batting an eyelid. From what i've heard from friends' observations, airports aren't that strict when it comes to liquids anymore.


Reply
Gold
(@janet-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Rebecca, so it is better to kill people with cancer? That is STUPID! 99% of people wearing sunscreen including me never go near an ocean or coral reef. You do realize you can be impacted by UV rays just driving around in your car. Get off your environmental high horse and learn a little about the harmful impact of the sun’s rays on humans. You are the thoughtless one here.


Reply
 Milo
(@Milo)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 65

It's been 14 years since the plot to detonate liquid explosives carried on board airliners was spoilt. It's time to relax / lift the ban. Most people are now bringing highly flammable liquids and gels on board anyway, alongside highly flammable and volatile metals tightly packed in individual containers.


Reply