Thai Airways Sues C...
 

Thai Airways Sues Customer For Complaining About Diversion

54 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
300 Views
Posts: 39955
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#16033]
wpf-cross-image

In the United States, I could see a passenger trying to sue an airline for a diversion. Meanwhile in Thailand, an airline is suing a passenger for complaining about a diversion, as flagged by View from the Wing.

Continue reading: Thai Airways Sues Customer For Complaining About Diversion

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


53 Replies
53 Replies
 Samo
(@Samo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 1408

I'm grateful for this kind of absurd laws as they help to single out countries with flawed legal systems, which I shall avoid visiting in the future. Thailand is a place I'd like to visit, but the number of cases where people got into legal trouble for posting a review is a good reminder to go somewhere else.


Reply
(@Endre)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 357

Thailand’s defamation laws are among the strictest in the world, similar to section 112. All there just so that Salims can continue with their kleptocracy. TG has transformed into a garbage company, a slim shadow of its former past.


Reply
(@Maryland)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 473

Mai pen rai, a phrase to use in Thailand when gently complaining. "Yes, my room has no air conditioning but mai pen rai". This allows complaints while saying it's no matter.


Reply
(@Icarus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2562

Suing a customer for a complaint is absurd. If the passenger was disruptive and caused a diversion that’s a different matter. If a customer sent threats and abusive language to staff, they can be blacklisted. But if you simply complain there is no legal recourse. What do they plan ? A prison sentence? Monetary compensation?

So if someone goes on their social media and complains, do they plan to sue them. What if the passenger is an Australian resident ?

What if I complain about the quality of the food. Would they sue if from
their perspective it was ok?

Come off it, people complain about diverting all the time, however if they are that bad I would avoid flying with them.

So in a nutshell Thai should mention on their website that they went accept complaints.


Reply
(@Bobby Spinks)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 10

I want aware Americans used the word 'knob' like we do over here 🙂


Reply
(@Edgar)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 18

I wonder if they are also scanning our comments here and planning to pick up one of us and charge us with some defamation or any order law they have...


Reply
(@Icarus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2562

If you look at their FB they should sue all the passengers claiming refunds as they have been writing abusive messages for the lack of any action


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2594

Thai's service has gone steadily downhill over the decades I've been flying them, to the point that I avoid them for long-haul trips. The in-flight "service" is almost at USA levels, so far have they fallen.

I guess I'm going to be sued now. Good luck with that, Thai Airways.

And btw, Thai Airways, suing a pax for complaining, even baselessly complaining, is going to cause a reputational hit much larger than the pax's complaint.


Reply
 Ross
(@Ross)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 548

An hour and a half is now "a short flight" ?


Reply
 NFSF
Diamond
(@nfsf)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 158

We don't. 8/10 would have no idea what it means.


Reply
Diamond
(@kxkiri)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

always has been, it's clearly short-haul.


Reply
(@globetrotter)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 273

We are in no position to criticize foreign cultures or judicial systems as ours is not the model of the world. We have Supreme Court knuckle heads issue a final decision in areas in which they have no basic education, training and experiences in rather than deferring to agencies' experts. Previous commentators expressed their opinions that reflect their ignorance of how a baseless criticism can adversely affect a business, insult a person's qualifications, or endanger a life. They also have never experienced an injustice in life. People should weigh the consequence of their act or rhetoric before expressing it or how to express it. The complainant is smart enough not to ever set foot in Thailand or fly its country's airline. We see it strict but they can view ours as a lawless country where crimes and violence are prevalent and three equal branches of government disrespect the laws in an antagonistic power grab conflict.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2594

"We are in no position to criticize foreign cultures or judicial systems as ours is not the model of the world."

Nope. One's judicial system doesn't need to be perfect to criticize another's.

Also, it's not "complainant" in this case, it's "complainer."


Reply
(@Andy 11235)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 528

I don't think it's news to anyone that Thai law does not protect free speech, so a regular on the route should know to be careful about what he says. That said, obviously these Thai companies have never heard of the Streisand Effect.


Reply
Diamond
(@kaleb_with_a_k)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 72

No sympathy at all for the passenger. Classic case of FAFO.


Reply
(@Ray Sharradh)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 14

Yes, the airline wanted the added expense of needlessly diverting to SYD, likely delaying the return leg. How dare that evil airline take action to ensure the safety of its passengers!!! The nerve!!!!! (Insert derisive eyeroll *here*)


Reply
(@Ray Sharradh)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 14

Sad to hear Thai joined the US airlines in the race to the bottom.


Reply
Diamond
(@mallthus)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 283

Every country has a flawed legal system. The question is "What are the flaws and how likely are they to impact me?" Truth be told, there's probably a happy medium between Thailand's "Any complaint is defamation." position and the US' "There are no legal consequences ever for saying anything at all."


Reply
(@Francis Wong)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

ThaiAirways sucks!
It is one of the worst customer service airlines in modern time.
On 20 Sep 2023 my flight to Manchester from Coperhagan was missed due to their long delay in Bangkok and they only managed to take me to London without offering me any assistance to go to Manchester.
After some struggles I did find my way to go to Manchester and they did not even pay my extra expenses.
Good that they sue the passengers and I am also suing them for breach of contract!


Reply
 Bob
(@Bob)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 751

The usa have every right to criticize most countries because when these countries encounter a natural disaster or major threat, one of the first thing they will do is reach out to the US for financial assistance. If a family member keeps asking me to borrow money you better believe I will have vocal opinions about their life choices.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 1035

Refreshing change for an airline to sue this a hole passenger. Those commentators inexplicably rooting for this sooky baby pax claiming this will damage the airline are looking at it the wrong way round. Maybe the effect will actually be to quiet down those other potential a hole pax who sulk and whinge when things (beyond the airline's control) go wrong. I can live that.


Reply
 Bob
(@Bob)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 751

That may be precisely why they sued one person, to make everybody else complaining to second guess themselves now and later.


Reply
 Joe
(@Joe)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 751

I only know a knob of butter because of the great British cookoff shows.


Reply
 Bob
(@Bob)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 751

Nah that's china's job.
But if you criticize their monarchy oh boy...


Reply
(@H. Kat)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I mean, idk if I'd hold up an American comment section on Facebook as as paragon of proper behavior, but you do you.


Reply
(@Jujutsu)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

A company suing a person for defamation has nothing to do with free speech. You can't just sling wild accusations around.


Reply
(@Jim P)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Won't be fling Thai airways any time soon. Wow.


Reply
 Sam
(@Sam)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 42

Yes. I mean, it is, isn't it? It's hardly medium haul. What would you call it?


Reply
(@Stephen collyer)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I think the passenger in question is a complete idiot who the he'll does he think he is I have the uttermost respect for the captain to make such a call and thai airways are excellent I hope they ban the passenger from ever flying Thai airways again .it.


Reply
(@Deng Li)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 5

Australian authorities should ban Thai Airways for terrorizing passengers. I would boycott Thai Airways for suing a passenger for telling the truth but I already avoid TA for their atrocious safety record.


Reply
Diamond
(@watson)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 501

The passenger may be a knob, but Thai Airways management are being right bellends!


Reply
 Pete
(@Pete)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 121

The question is whether any judgement will be enforceable in Australia. I’m not a lawyer, but I’ll wager that any attempt to enforce the judgement here or extradite the defendant to Thailand would be quite literally laughed out of court, with Thai Airways ordered to pay his costs on an indemnity basis.


Reply
(@monopod)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 40

An added context here is that trashing Thai Airways is our national past time. Most are of course reasonable: frequent delays, plane swap (esp the A320 business class fiasco), and the declining service (which I find debatable) and the airlines won't be dumb enough to sue people for these complaints. But this dumb ass took things a step too far and accused the flight crew of being too incompetent to land the plane. So I'd say he gets what he's asking for.


Reply
 Joe
(@Joe)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 2

That's OK to the people that saying they won't travel to Thailand because of this. You will not be missed. Plenty of other people will fill your spot. Thanks.


Reply
 Joe
(@Joe)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 2

You are 100% correct. He just won't be able to travel here again.


Reply
(@Gabe Z)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 69

I don’t know if that’s a good summary of US defamation laws. In the U.S., the bar to prove defamation is high, especially for public figures. But if you can clear the bar, there’s no place you’d rather win a financial award. 🙂


Reply
 Chul
(@Chul)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Well, that passenger definitely defamed the airline, captain and crew. You didn't see what he actually wrote. It's not a case of a corporate silencing its customers for fair criticism. The accusation made by that passenger deserves to be taken to court.


Reply
(@monopod)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 40

The poster is Thai


Reply
(@Peter)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

This person might have been unreasonable. Safety is important. Still, for those who have travelled in Asia, there is this culture taught in school that constructive criticisms are not allowed. This causes many citizens to not grow much. Too many cultures & people are too proud to re-assess. Have you checked the English spelling system lately?


Reply
(@James)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 378

He didn’t say the comments section of Facebook was “proper behaviour” did he? But laws in many countries mean you have to do a lot more than have a dig at an airline to end up in court. Indeed, in Australia only people - not companies - can be defamed.


Reply
(@Mikey)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I love it. You have a freedom of speech, but it doesn’t mean you can say whatever you want.


Reply
(@Rezwan Rashid)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 5

If you think Thai Airways has thr worst service, I welcome you to fly many other airlines around the globe to experience much worse! Buying a ticket, doesn't make one a stockholder of an airline. Neither does it make one a decision maker above the Captain operating the flight!


Reply
(@Paul Thavat)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

This article is about why should 95% of the world population should follow the 5% the population of U.S.A.'s standard of social practice and customs


Reply
(@Pat pilcher)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Did you bother to check conditions on the day for Melbourne? We're other flights landing with impunity? Throwing opinions about is all good, but please for the love of God, back them up with facts and do some simple research


Reply
(@Saher Yacub)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Dont be sorry. Be brave enough to face ur baseless complaints. Dont be sorry, dont delete. U think u can just say whatever u want. U are better than the pilot huh? Buy ur own aircraft... And do as u please, no one cares!


Reply
(@Graeme bell)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Thai laws are getting more strict that's why I'm planning to leave after 21 years most happy but, as journalist it ain't worth it, Graeme


Reply
(@Thai reader)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Can you read Thai if you can't then I don't surprise that you give this kind of opinion why you don't understand.

Thai people always trash Thai Airway a lot and many times they deserve its since their ground staff is quite bad. However , that passenger action is unacceptable at all. His behavior is not only bad but his language that he used is far worse.

Thai language have more way to condemn other people than English and when people complain we can still be civilized but no this guy use the language in one of the most assault way. Even if his critics is valid many people will find his post unacceptable but his critics is not valid at all so you can guess what people reaction would be in this case. Any person who would side with him would be only the real hater of Thai Airway.

I totally agree with Thai Airway action that you have to save the dignity of the crew this time not only because they are your employee but as a fellow citizen. The passenger behavior is similar to the action of the daughter of Korean Airline(can't remember the exact airline only belong to Korea) who throw a nut to the air attendant. This is the behavior of someone who think he is so elite that he can trash other people anyway he want and make it look like he just doing the right thing.


Reply
(@bigjinla)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 539

I'm surprised to see so many people defending TG. It seems to me that the company would have more important things to worry about than FB comments.


Reply
 Jon
(@Jon)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

The U.S. has the first amendment, which protects free speech. Plus, being a largely Christian country, people there observe the “turn the other cheek” creed and allow others to vent. In Thailand and most Asian countries, these things are almost nonexistent because of the uniformity culture + the culture of not questioning authority. I guess the lesson learned here is the good old adage “when in Rome.”


Reply
(@Jane Josefsberg)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I love Thai airways, the best service, friendly staff who go out of their way to help and safety is always number 1. Some people just like to complain for the sake of complaining.
Thai airways keep up the good work and I will see you soon


Reply
(@snory)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 47

As a Thai, I can chime in a little bit on this. I think it is fine to criticize Thai Airways. A lot of us criticizes its poor management, plane swapping, poor quality catering, etc. I did that all the time and it seems fair to call out the fact for fact.

In this case, I think the passenger used insulting languages and self-made facts leading to the lawsuit.

The languages such as the captain is an idiot and should "Put on a skirt", stating that the airline did not put on enough fuel, the crew lacks competent in English, etc. are a grey area in defamation suit because it can lead to possibility of suggesting that TG did not comply with ICAO regulation on Fuel and Crew's English competency.

Moreover, I think this lawsuit is rather a deterrent tactic, and I think it will get settled out of court or dropped before reaching the court decision since the passenger already issued a public apology.


Reply
(@Unserved)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I am afraid to comment. I might be next!!!


Reply
(@Stuart)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 1

The laws are those of Thailand and I respect those as I do any countries laws. If I don't like the laws I don't support the country but Thailand is a second home to me and it's people are just awesome. I can understand Thai Airways point here. The world is full of smart idiots who would struggle to parallel park their car let alone fly a plane. As someone with an udnerstaning of aviation I am sure Thai airways did the correct things. Let's hope this makes people think before they plaster their stupid comments all over the web.


Reply