“Storage spIce” sb “space.”
These look a lot more modern than the current product, the doors will help, and hopefully the wider foot wells will be substantial enough to actually make a difference.
“Storage spIce” sb “space.”
These look a lot more modern than the current product, the doors will help, and hopefully the wider footwells will be substantial enough to actually make a difference.
Qantas 787 flights are (mostly) long. Current seats are coffin-like. Their new seats need to be wider and the footwells bigger to boost relaxation and comfort.
Ben, I think you really should try the non-JAL Safran Unity seat. It seems you got the great impression of it from your JAL A35K flight, but the Unity seat on JAL is so heavily customized that it's practically a different product.
The Unity on JAL is pitched at 51", and the shell height's also raised than the standard offering.
Standard Safran Unity is pitched at 45"(6" is a huge difference!), and the shell's significantly lower than JAL's.
Riyadh Air has the Unity seat in the standard dimensions, and so will Qantas' Project Sunrise.
The Thompson Vantage XL seat is not very different from the "standard" Unity in terms of the dimensions, and Thompson will feel more spacious because the monitor's positioned a few inches more forward.
I once had a chance to try the standard Unity mockup, and it felt way more cramped than competitors. The monitor was positioned closer to the passenger(in order to fit a bigger one like 24"), and the backrest had quite a large gap from the backshell, which was an inefficient use of space.
19" screens in a modern J in 2026 is pathetic, especially in a staggered config where you can fit very large 24" screens.
I don't think this is the vantage xl modified, looks very close to the updated Recaro R7 seat design
I actually prefer these seats compared to the angled lie flat seats.
