Big mistake because of language and cultural differences . Mergers ought to be of like entities . Cannot have cats and parakeets together , for example .
Could also be a way of Korean/Hanjin ponying up a bit extra cash, since Delta has decided that it no longer wants to be as wholly reliant on Korean Air for all of its Asian traffic that's not going to Tokyo or Shanghai.
Just an additional potential detail.
I wonder whether JAL really benefits from the JV with AA, an airline with barely any presence in the Far East.
Using another example, AFKL cooperate closely with Gol in terms of codeshares, interline tickets etc to secure feed from/to all over Brazil, but they don't need a transatlantic JV with an airline that barely flies to Europe.
I think they want to control more of the regional feed for Japan and regional Korean traffic.
I dont think alliances will be changed....i actually see korean going to OW really.....i think DL may lose on this one. But if JAL isnt getting much recognition from AA and other OW partners...i can see them going to Skyteam here.
This partnership's just for flights between Japan and South Korea.
HND-GMP is the only Japan-South Korea route both JAL and ANA fly, and they don't fly their metal to any other route.
JAL has codeshares with KAL on HND-GMP only, but ANA has with almost all the South Korea-Japan flgihts operated by OZ. They literally relied on the codeshares.
When the merger between KE and OZ is finalized this December, OZ code will be permanently gone, and so will be the codeshares ANA have with OZ.
JAL is trying to benefit from the merger by codesharing with KE on all the Japan-South Korea flights which ANA cannot do anymore.
And JAL buying shares of KE is to help the president. Hoban Group, a South Korean construction company have been buying massive shares of KE with a potential hostile M&A. Hoban now owns 20.15% stake of Hanjin Kal, the parent company of Korean Air, and the president Walter Cho owns 20.57% which is only 0.42%p larger.
Without the support of JAL, Walter Cho may lose control of Korean Air, hence the investment.
It is akin to Armenia and Azerbaijan , France and Germany , India and Pakistan , all playing cards together .
Interesting in that the Koreans hate the Japanese. I wonder how they feel about this.
I think allowing Asiana and Korean to merge was a total failure in policy, but that ship sailed.
On the business side. JAL switching to Sky Team would be significant. What a boost to Delta trying to compete with United on trans pacific routes.
I wish that JAL could bring KAL's inflight standards up to their level. To me, KAL is mostly a last choice option over the Pacific.
ANA is 0-2 here.
Asiana dropped out of Star, and JAL snagged a part in the only major Korean airline.
ANA should rush into Starlux partial ownership/JV before they end up in One World and JAL wins again.
AFKL still have an investment in JAL, going back before JL was in oneworld. It's why there's still a Flying Blue partnership with JL.
Looking forward to more flights between Fukuoka and Busan… IYKYK.
Delta at least used to have an interline agreement with ANA. I'm not sure if that's still around or not, though. I do remember seeing itineraries available to book on Delta's website that included ANA segments, though. That was probably a year or two before the pandemic, though.
Does it allow One World to plead to Cathay Pacific that they allow Starlux in ?
This makes sense to me. There is always strong demand for flights between Japan and Korea, and this strengthens coverage for routes outside of the usual Tokyo-Seoul.
I don't see why this is so peculiar. Alliances are the most visible (and probably useful) form cooperation to the consumer, which is why there is always way too much emphasis on alliances.
The reality though is that in the industry, there are many other forms of cooperation, with a JV being the closest one, as this essentially allows legal price fixing and revenue sharing mechanisms.
In principle, you can form a joint venture with anyone, as long as regulators agree, i.e., if you can get antitrust immunity. For this to happen, you usually just have to prove the benefit that it has to the customer. Therefore, airlines look way beyond alliances, which are very limiting in their nature and often involve a substantial amount of politics. I would go as far as saying that alliances are losing relevance in current market structures.
Korean airlines is a founding member of Skyteam. They are doing extremely well. Japan airlines is likely to join the Skyteam partnership. My strong opinion.
Crispin Fernandes
New York
I’m not sure where all the speculation of alliances switching is coming from. JL acquired a very small stake in KE (<5% according to news reports), and JL also codeshares extensively with partners in other alliances (e.g., AF, GA, CI, WS, etc.). And as other commenters have noted, there are plenty of other business factors that may be involved, including coordinating limited slots at HND & GMP, and to outcompete NH (who is about to lose OZ as a codeshare partner).
