Boom Technology is a Colorado-based aeronautics company that has been working on bringing back supersonic passenger air travel. Specifically, the Boom Overture is supposed to become the modern day Concorde, and both American Airlines and United Airlines have already placed orders for the jet.
Continue reading: Boom Supersonic Announces New Engine Partner
Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.
I'm completly with you Ben! I don't believe a second a supersonic "event" will ever happen, unless with Fighter Jets. But those doesn't use to be profitable.
There is probably a lot lot more people today that would pay a lot of money to get somewhere faster then in the days of the concorde. Even flying today is a lot more convenient.
Will they show up with some fifteenth-handed mig-25 jets and claimed them to be the fastest jet available?
Likely GE is my bet. GE is working on a new engine for the F35 for 2027. Currently Pratt and Whitney supplies the engine for the F35.
Eli, I don't know if you ever entered a Concorde but I can assure you, today even in narrow bodies you have more space. Back in time a retour ticket in Concorde CDG-LHR/JFK costed around 20k$. Today you fly that Route in First for aprox the same amount on a Full Fare Ticket. Quite sure there isn't a market for Super Sonic today, not to mention the overfly restrictions who are still valid. I'm sure Super Sonic flying is dead, unless on Fighter Jets.
Shocked it’s not G E or Pratt Whitney. Lockheed Martin ? Raetheon ? Honda ?
I’m flying on the inaugural flight for sure. I hope they launch ahead of schedule. Hopefully 2028.
BOOM !
The article has a tweet about GE, PW, RR, and Safran.
Other engine companies include Honeywell and Williams International. Williams doesn't have the experience so it's either Honeywell or smoke and mirrors.
Hmm, if it's not any of the big four engine makers, I wonder if Boom will be the first commercial aircraft manufacturer to introduce rotating detonation engines (RDE). This is reportedly a hot (pun intended) area of research for both the U.S. and China, as RDE reportedly offer better fuel efficiency and thrust for missiles, aircraft, and even ships than existing turbofan/turbojet technology.
Given that Boom Overture will be a supersonic aircraft, perhaps Boom will boldly dive into the deep end of the pool with RDE.
Can Boom get it to fly? Sure. But, that's not the question.
Can Boom get them to buy? That's the question.
What does Boom need to do? 12 cents per passenger mile. It's that simple.
I just cannot see Boom succeeding because of the seriously limited range of the overture. Unless they think the entirety of the New York to London or Paris route will be entirely operated by overtures and nothing else, I see no way of this succeeding
The overture redesign as well looks suspiciously similar to the design for the failed Boeing 2707. The bulging fuselage at the front and the engines are identical to a design that was developed in the 1960s. Innovating design? I don't think
It would be exciting, but the combustion instabilities and the pressure oscillations would make it very difficult to control. In addition, it would be noisier than the turbojet alternatives. My money is on Honeywell, although I doubt they have the capabilities to make a supersonic turbojet.
There are of course a list of superb Russian design bureaus, but I doubt any would do business with a US company 😉
How about China, sure they will be like to get involve in that, for them is more about technology and the glamour to be the first country to acomplish that
"...willing to take a multi-billion dollar loss on the project ..."
Sounds like Elon...
How about sitting in the middle seat for fifteen hours?we absolutely have to have this concept become a reality.Otherwise, let’s return to the stagecoach.
No such thing as a "superb Russian design bureau" and there never has been either.
You must be confusing them with the Ukrainians, which at this point is sad how misguided you are.
Surely they will soon announce a jv with BALTIA to provide feeder traffic for international flights.
I really don’t see a market for SS travel per:
1. The world gaining comfort with “zoom” meetings and the cost of face to face meetings
2. Right or wrong, environmental concerns. I can see air Tavel in general facing a decline.
3. The rise of lifestyle concerns, too much travel and too littLe home.
Anyone who says that flying today is a lot more convenient obviously never took the the skies before 9/11/2001!
Concorde launched in an era of bulky primative computers, highly expensive international phone calls, snail mail and face to face meetings. Boom is planning to launch a slightly slower plane in an age of free international zoom calls. Nope it has no market.
Honda doesn't make turbine engines. The engine on the Honda jet is produced br GE.
Hiding in the midst of this, Boom has NOT done a demonstration test-flight of its testbed, the XB-1. This was supposed to occur in 2017, but the date has been continuously pushed back. Now even 2022 seems out of reach.
Sorry friend. The engine on the HondaJet IS produced by Honda Aero in Burlington NC. They just delivered their 500th HF120 engine. GE Honda Aero Engines is a 50-50 partnership.
That having been said an engine for a SST is not in the cards.
All you skeptics out there you have to believe in this company’s goal. Don’t shoot them down before they get one plane off the ground. No pun intended. Be supportive what these people know OK you have something here do everything you need to do to make your dream possible
Let's be positive about this possible supersonic commercial aircraft give them time and let Boom have a chance to prove themselves that the Overture will be viable and practical NASA has been And stiil working and testing a redesign supersonic Aircraft that doesn't make that sonic boom overland possibly Boom can consult NASA for suggestions for the Overture's design improvement where it doesn't make sonic booms sound instead of New to London it can be modified to fly anywhere and increase it's practicality I have total faith for what Boom is doing I'm positive that this plane will be successful
Wow - with a small player here for engines - I do not see this aircraft happening.
Has anyone ever heard of Kratos?
I was in the airline biz for 38 years and I never heard of them. But sure, there's LOTS of stuff I didn't hear of that was around and real.
Personally I remain very skeptical about the Overture.
It's really flying against headwinds when it comes to fuel burn vs speed. It's hard to paint it "green" and that's why the mainline engine manufacturers all backed out.
But best of luck to Boom, they will need it. i suspect a lot of people will lose their investments.
"Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc, (Nasdaq: KTOS), headquartered in San Diego, California,[3] specializes in directed-energy weapons, unmanned systems, satellite communications, cyber security/warfare, microwave electronics, missile defense, training and combat systems." -- Wikipedia.
Seems to me Kratos sounds more like an armed force-based corporate than a consumer/corporate-based corp...
On February 24, 2020, The Kratos Unmanned Systems division bought small turbojet manufacturer Technical Directions Inc. (TDI), based in Detroit, Michigan.
Barely started at the engine business... Long way to go...
You got that right! I can't think of anything in the entire experience that is better today. Ground, plane itself (TV screen maybe), FA ( not stewardess), food, passenger attire, passenger attitude, you name. Actually it was starting to decline in the mid to late 90s. Is what it is like a lot of stuff.
I think the reason why none of the major engine builders have signed up to develop an engine for this white elephant project has nothing to do with them being “green”, though they certainly will try to use that as an excuse.
The real reason is simple math. Even if their wildest dreams come true, the Overture will never be a big seller which means there really isn’t much of a market for the engine manufacturers. The costs to develop and certify an engine are huge. Balance that against the limited number of engines that ultimately will be sold means the whole project is a non-starter. The Concorde benefited from an engine manufacturer that was government owned. Making a profit wasn’t really a consideration. Prestige carried the day back then. Times have changed since then.
I wish them all luck. But the likelihood of this being a commercial success for either company is very poor.
What’s your point ? Political disagreement ? They’re in the aerospace industry. They can build engines.
Being in the defense industry for 15+ years, there's a difference between "being in the aerospace industry" and "having the capability to build commercial aircraft engines". For example, Lockheed Martin have several major US Navy programs that deeply affect the systems on board ships and submarines. But they have no ship building capability (they use General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries for that). The are still considered a major player in the naval defense industry.
I don't really know too much about Kratos. At 3,300 employees and given the quick tour of their website, they sound more closer to a smaller SAIC (~26,000 employees) than a smaller Pratt & Whitney (~39,000 employees). Kratos seems to be as a small systems integrator that would need to build up it's aircraft engine manufacturing capability. Kratos did acquire Technical Directions Inc. (TDI) and doing a quick search on that, they seemed to develop turbojet Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) for experimental missile technology. But turbojet technology for missile research is whole separate ball game to production manufacturing for a commercial aircraft.
I just wanna say, I really hope that Boom can somehow make this work. It would be really cool to be able to fly on a supersonic airliner now after watching the Concorde at JFK when I was a little kid. From my point of view, this "announcement" just makes me very concerned.
Haha - so Boom is teaming up with the turbofan/turbojet manufacturer for small UAVs and cruise missiles! Boom! In some ways, the concept is similar, with the exception of one key requirement - multiple uses!
Toobis is too busy living in his delirium-ridden world! If it makes you feel any better, keep on believing your nonsense, buddy.
I am aware of them due to an acquisition we were eyeing in the past. They have a division which make turbofans and turbojets for UAVs and cruise missiles. I hope Boom's aircraft see a better end then most of their other vehicles 😉
The only future for this plane is for a "niche" transport for the Pentagon. If it ever sees the light of day, it will be to ferry high priority supplies and personnel from Hawaii to the western Pacific to fight China. I suspect one could get a pretty decent number of hypersonic air launched cruise missiles inside.
Concorde was also able to use existing RR Olympus engines from the Vulcan bomber. They didn't need to develop not just a new engine, but a new engine concept.
Making supersonic engines to power an airliner is a long way from making subsonic engines to power a cruise missle or UAV, especially when they have to do so in a cost/effective way for a commercial customer.
Pax who are willing to shell out for SST are not the same customer base as the middle seat riders. The question is: is someone going to pop $2000 per segment for SS travel vs $1000 for Polaris lie-flat seats. I hope so, because I’d love the opportunity to check breaking the number off my bucket list. But I’d be surprised if there’s enough buy-in from the traveling public.
I hope they go 4-stroke so the pilot doesn't have to waste a bunch of time mixing up all that fuel and oil.
I think that Briggs & Stratton would be a good alternative, it’s never let me down on my lawn mower
When you're "engine partner" has less than $1b in book value for a many $b project, it's fundamentally unserious.
Not going to happen.
Yes. Many of us would much rather relax in business class with a lie-flat seat for 12 hours in a 550-mph airliner, instead of sitting mostly upright for half the flight time and paying 3 times the price for an SST ticket. With the former you can sleep, watch movies, or whatever.
Take a lot of money from “investors”, live like kings for a few years, rat hole money away somewhere, go out of business, disappear, and a good time was had by all, god bless us everyone.
In the midst of a myriad of evidence to the contrary? ...that's called being a sucker.
And this is coming from someone with "Concorde" in the username. 🙁
This. No matter how fast you make an aircraft, it'll never compete with the speed of an electric signal. Which is why the business case for faster aircraft (for the mass market) is essentially non-existence. It's like claiming that you have the fastest ocean liner, after the 707 had debuted.
But, like ocean liners in the age of jets: there may still be a market for smaller niche wealthy ops.
Which is why I'd say that if we ever see passenger supersonic service together with petroleum-powered aircraft, it'll be in the form of biz jets.
Mr Scholl inspires confidence. So, Yes. I think Boom will happen, provided it can keep to it's advertised timeline. I am saving money for a Heathrow- Newarke return ticket with United.
I DO not believe in Boom
Supersonic suits only to super rich biliniors, who can afford individual Supersonic Aircrafts.
The most travelled class is economy class , which faces horrible experiences such as 4 hrs prior to departure reporting, long n tiresome ques at baggage, security,immigration,boarding checks.
It's require near about 30 minutes toput yourselves on congested seats shouldering Yr co passenger. After Take-off, flight comes to normal, passengers r so intance that they run to toilets which r in scarcity on all forms of flights, So there's an another Q.
So Boom should bring improvement on all these aspects.