Aer Lingus Transatl...
 

Aer Lingus Transatlantic A321LR Routes Coming Next Summer

22 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
495 Views
Posts: 40092
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#8108]
wpf-cross-image

Aer Lingus has done an impressive job with the way in which they've grown their transatlantic route network. Until a few years ago the airline was struggling financially, while now the airline has managed to become profitable while growing. For example, here are some of their new transatlantic routes in the past few years:

Continue reading: Aer Lingus Transatlantic A321LR Routes Coming Next Summer

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


21 Replies
21 Replies
(@Susan)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

DFW, AUS or IAH, please!


Reply
(@Shane)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 9

Small mistake: Since the start of this summer, Aer Lingus has been leasing 5 757s (from ASL) not 3.


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40092

@ Shane -- Fixed, thanks!


Reply
Diamond
(@adamr)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I'd love to see them come to SAN as we grow our international flight footprint. Though with Aer Lingus and BA being owned by the same holdings company, San Diego being very much a leisure (and military) market, and BA and Aer Lingus generally serving as more of a gateway to Europe versus true O/D traffic to London/Ireland, I'm sure this is a pipe dream.


Reply
(@gerry Monaghan)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Austin,Nashville and Tampa


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 496

I remember the first time I took a narrow-body across the Atlantic. A United 757 (I think) from EWR-LHR. I was surprised at the time and disliked the idea. But, if it means opening up transatlantic non-stops to a bunch more cities (maybe even YHZ and YSJ in Atlantic Canada), then I'm all for it!


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 496

Correction: I meant YYT (St. John's, Newfoundland), not YSJ (Saint John, New Brunswick).


Reply
(@Random Travel)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 19

This was a long time in the making, and Airbus is at the moment better positionned than Boeing simply because the A320's are higher and can therefore accomodate a bigger fan 😀

London airports, BRU, AMS, CDG, CPH, ARN, OSL... the East Coast via EaysJet (single narrowbody aircrafts ULCC) is just a few years away !


Reply
 chub
(@chub)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 161

My wishlist: CLE, DTW, CVG, IND, STL

I’m assuming PIT again paid a $hit ton of subsidies to EI


Reply
(@Anton)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

Boston sounds boring but JetBlue have good connections from there which is one of my preferred US airlines which you can connect up with then.


Reply
 M.O.
(@M.O.)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 39

What are those A321s going to look like inside?

And all the people saying Austin and Dallas and so on are crazy. An A321LR doesn't have the range to make it there. It's barely within the theoretical max-distance, but no airline is going to spend that much on fuel to fly a narrowbody that far.


Reply
(@CraigTPA)
Joined: 17 years ago

Posts: 299

I'd like to see Tampa - Dublin.

If they can still offer service to UK destinations from the US after Brexit, service from New York to either Cardiff or Bristol is a possibility, my first long narrowbody flights were between EWR and BRS on CO back in the day, and if you're going to Wales or the southwest UK it's so nice not to have to deal with Heathrow or Gatwick. BOS-Cardiff/Bristol is a possibility too, both can offer B6 connections.

Another thought is Ft. Lauderdale, both to offer lower-cost alternatives to MIA and to offer Latin American connections on JetBlue. Orlando could offer that too.


Reply
Diamond
(@scudder)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 357

Most of the ideas/hopes/proposals above ignore that to get beyond the northeastern US they’d have to substitute the 321lr into a somewhere currently served by the 330s. And that seems unlikely.


Reply
(@Callum)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 694

Only 11 mentions of "A321LR" in that article, couldn't repeat it any more than that!?


Reply
(@Philip)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 1

MSP Would be great!


Reply
 Ben
(@Ben)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 117

I definitely would not have expected it but SDF might actually be a good pick. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_large_Irish-American_populations


Reply
(@Traveler)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 47

From the British Isles, some of the key routes the A321LR opens up are in SE Caribbean, destinations like Trinidad and Tobago. At present most routes are via USA which makes them slow and expensive for passengers. A direct route could be hugely profitable for an airline since price competition is so weak (other than charters) and traffic isn't strong enough to support a wide body for much of the year. Whether it is best flown by Aer Lingus out of Dublin rather than BA out of Gatwick is unclear, but I would be surprised if IAG didn't see potential for the region.


Reply
 HDCA
(@HDCA)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 37

The two largest metro areas in the US without a BA flight (and without a Dublin non-stop), and within range of DUB on an A321LR are DTW and MSP.

Of course, both are Delta fortress hubs, so Aer Lingus may not want to go head to head, but the opportunity is there if the IAG people want to give it a shot.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 415

Justin

You can already fly a narrowbody to St. Johns and Halifax - both AC and WestJet use 737-Max planes from LHR and LGW respectively.

Problem is neither have great connections, so YUL would enable one-stop to LAX and SFO, neatly breaking the trip in half


Reply
Gold
(@dander)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

fly them to the east coast to free up the longer range aircraft. then fly to Phx and SLC


Reply
(@mikeb-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I still do not understand why AerLingus is not yet member of OneWorld despite the IAG ownership .... I've asked and asked IAG and AL but I never get an answer ....


Reply