Sky Palace Airways:...
 

Sky Palace Airways: New US Airline With 777s?

23 Posts
12 Users
0 Reactions
408 Views
Posts: 40647
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#9747]
wpf-cross-image

On August 1, 2019, Sky Palace Airways became the latest airline to file with the US Department of Transportation for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. The renderings of their cabins in the filing are incredible, and they sure live up to their "Sky Palace" name... Okay, just kidding, that was an Emirates April…

Continue reading: Sky Palace Airways: New US Airline With 777s?

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


22 Replies
22 Replies
Diamond
(@sean-m)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1249

240BH per airframe at $7500PBH is delusional for year-round ad-hoc work. Unless they have a long term contract already locked-in, this will fail.


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 171

What on earth happened to James and Spencer? Maybe I missed it but haven't noticed an article by them in ages.


Reply
 Ryan
(@Ryan)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 366

They will be prone to operational disasters. Regional airlines run 5 crews per aircraft and the planes fly less than 240 hours per month.


Reply
(@greg237)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The 400 seats could be used for hajj charters, as people going on it do not demand luxury as long as they get there. Though, it only happens for a few weeks in the year.


Reply
Gold
(@gary-leff)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 296

fwiw Miami Air just did a Hajj charter, and Saudi Arabia is looking to encourage more U.S. charters.
http://saudigazette.com.sa/article/573677/SAUDI-ARABIA/First-US-airline-flight-since-1997-lands-in-Jeddah-168-pilgrims-arrive


Reply
Diamond
(@raksiam)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 562

@jay
Pretty sure they jumped ship to TPG


Reply
 Jake
(@jake-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Why don’t any charter airlines invest in newer more fuel efficient planes? They’d be able to slightly undercut their competitors who are using older less efficient planes and the savings from the lower fuel burn will be profit.


Reply
(@alex-tambiev)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0

I think the reason Hi Fly’s A380 isn’t operating Hajj charters because those are heavily regulated by the Saudi government and have rigid capacity constraints. So while high-density configures widebodies are often used, I remember hearing about A380s specifically not being suitable.


Reply
(@Ethan)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 316

I don’t think Spencer is at TPG though?
Also, for charter, lower utilizing rate must benefit from older planes.


Reply
(@Verno St. Amour)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 7

Like the old saying goes: "How do you make a small fortune in aviation? Start with a large one"
These ventures are dicey, at best.


Reply
 JC1
(@jc1)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 53

Spencer went to God Save the Points and is now a partial owner from what I understand. James went to TPG UK.


Reply
(@Niko_jas)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 340

What did happen to HiFly's big summer customer for the A380 that they were proudly boasting of earlier this year?


Reply
(@Vanya)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 157

Speaking of fancy names for charter airlines, there is a quite large Russian cheap charter airline called "Royal Flight". There's nothing royal about flying with them, trust me 🙂
Plus they do have some strange non-charter routes, like Moscow-Taipei.


Reply
Gold
(@ben-holz)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 289

@Vanya hah coincidentally came across them the other day. When I saw they had 777s I was hoping it featured a special cabin layout (a la Rossiya), but unfortunately it’s just old EK 777s in a Y/J comfiguration


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 78

As for the name, many thongs sound great in one language or dialect but strange in English.
"Sky Palace" probably sounds/seems better in the native language or dialect of one or more of their intended passenger groups.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 78

*things. Rubbish type-o. Or bizarre predictive text.


Reply
Diamond
(@glenn-t)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1213

Secondhand 772's, with 400 seats? Sounds more like upstairs/downstairs á la Downton Abbey rather than a Sky Palace. Can't wait to see their fantasy advertising featuring images of the Taj Mahal.


Reply
(@Vanya)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 157

@Ben Holz yeah, most of these airlines in Russia don't really care about their own identity or product.
Another curious one is IrAero, who also has ex-Emirates 777s. They sell business class at significant price premium but the only difference is the seat. No special service, no better meals, no alcohol etc.
I wonder what Royal Flight will do in terms of service, if anything.


Reply
(@gantt-cookson)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

As a charter operator myself....that's an ambitious per hour utilization.


Reply
(@BASSETT)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Ben, Not sure how this relevant ? "Yes, there are 787 engine issues, but that’s a short term problem". They will be operating 777s.


Reply
 Noah
(@Noah)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 15

@Jake - aside from potential long wait for a new plane, you have both capital costs to buy the plane and operating costs to run it. While the operating costs may be, let’s say10% cheaper per seat, if the plane costs 10x, it isn’t worth it. Payback period would be munch longer. And, since charter is lower utilization, the fraction of costs that are capital vs operating are much greater

Same reason you likely don’t own a Tesla even though it would be cheaper energy cost. If you don’t drive enough, hard to justify the much higher price relative to a nice reliable Honda Accord.


Reply
(@Lumma)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 128

@bassett because charter airlines are running 777s and others on behalf of airlines that have 787s that they can't use because of the engine issues


Reply