How The Government ...
 

How The Government May Provide Aid To US Airlines

28 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
384 Views
Posts: 40331
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#10656]
wpf-cross-image

Today Delta revealed some drastic measures they're taking in light of the current situation, including grounding 300 planes, canceling 40% of their flights, and... asking the government for help?!? I think Delta's request for government aid caught a lot of people off guard: Is the situation so bad already that even the most successful of…

Continue reading: How The Government May Provide Aid To US Airlines

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


27 Replies
27 Replies
(@James S)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 365

As far as I know, it's not up to the white house. Nancy Pelosi oversees the House, which is where bills related to the budget need to come from.

The white house proposal rewards a private company at the expense of local governments who rely on those fees to maintain the airports.


Reply
Diamond
(@batterytraveller)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

This is dumb, reducing or eliminating that taxes doesn’t mean the airline gets to keep them. With market prices falling, they likely as not get handed to the consumer in fare cuts, which may generate some extra revenue at the margin. This is ECON101. It also doesn’t matter squat if they get to keep the taxes if no one is buying tickets.


Reply
 Mark
(@Mark)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 147

Delta is laying off 40% of their workforce...?


Reply
(@JetAway)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 286

@James S-without functioning and viable airlines the local communities would not need airports. So I guess your approach does save the expense of maintaining local airports.


Reply
Diamond
(@derek-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 491

Have a Medicare for All type industry. Let the airlines fail then have the federal government take over the remaining airlines. After all, Bernie Sanders claims Medicare has a low expense ratio so a new US Airlines (run by the federal government) could have equally low expense ratios. This is a golden opportunity.


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6319

The 7.5% excise tax wouldn't be fair to LCC since they already avoided much of those already. Or is it a good way for the government to payback these LCC. From the looks, there might be nothing left to SAVE.


Reply
(@James s)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 365

Derek, I don't recall the oil shocks of the 70s putting them out of business.... Thanks to the regulation


Reply
 Adi
Gold
(@adi)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The problem, as mentioned on a previous thread, is the last time we bailed out airlines (9-11) we got really nothing back except more profit-mongering for the airlines (no more meals, more seats per plane, baggage fees, seat choice fees, this fee, that fee). So there is limited goodwill towards the airlines now.

Also why should airlines get bailouts- what about the airline employees? other people who have been hardshipped by the virus.
Slippery slope.


Reply
(@givemeupgrade)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Keep the tax in the form of a low-interest loan. C suite agrees to max salaries of $500k until loans are paid in full.


Reply
(@Daniel)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 29

This is as dumb an idea as reducing the payroll tax to help people who can’t work.... If you’re getting paid zero, who cares if you have an extra 7.2%, it’s still zero lol.


Reply
(@Noah Bowie)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 247

It's no surprise that airlines are already requesting government aid. This is them trying to cover all bases and make it seem like they knew this situation was a possibility from the start. That being said the multiple travel bans do nothing except give US and European airlines a much tougher time weathering the storm of Coronavirus. If the biggest and most stable airlines are already issuing serious warnings then the future for smaller airlines (cough Norwegian cough) looks much bleaker.


Reply
 Ross
(@Ross)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 563

Travelers look at the bottom-line cost, which includes the taxes. Might as well let airlines charge an extra $10 per ticket, and let them keep that too. No one will know the difference, until competition sets in.
Airlines should get paid when a plane takes off at least 80% full. Then they should get a subsidy for every day a plane sits idle. This will both assure profits, and keep Greta happy. Airline employees can get extended unemployment benefits. Flight attendants can be retrained as healthcare workers. We all know, they're going to be needed. Pilots can be paid for tutoring by voice coaches, so when they return to work we might understand what they are mumbling up there.


Reply
(@Zooming with Joel)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 5

So the Delta, United and AA are now ok with government subsidies? Subsidies are of for DL, UA and AA but not the M3? Isn’t that unfair business practice? Hope this will be the end of the ranting about the M3 getting government subsidies. Ok sure things are dire. But so what? Business is business. Survival of the fittest. Hypocrisy at its finest.


Reply
Diamond
(@tim-dunn)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 7493

@Lucky
I believe Delta said it would cut 40% of its capacity, not necessarily flights.

Its entire transatlantic and transpacific networks amount to about 30% of its capacity which is usually measured by ASMs - but they will fly some of each of those including to Africa.

The likelihood is that Delta will cut the majority of its Asia and Europe networks with 20-25% of its domestic network at this point.


Reply
(@August)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 52

I will be having NO GD bailouts for these GD airlines!!! NONE!!

I want to see airlines go back to 1957 style, everyone wearing a suit, people being polite and not allowing all the flotsam and jetsam along with their "service animals" fly with them.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 412

This really frosts my ass! The airlines squeeze us for baggage fees, seat fees, fares have been going up, loyalty programs being stripped, the consumer has been taking it the can. And now they want our tax dollars too? Hell NO!


Reply
 Timo
Diamond
(@timo)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 397

@Derek on please, you never heard of de-regulation in U.S. airlines?! Government owned and operated anything never is cheaper because there is no incentive to be efficient.


Reply
(@HereWeGo)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 4

...so the ones obsessively fighting against government aids for airlines worldwide want government aids now - that's pure bigotry


Reply
 RB
(@RB)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 13

I realise the current situation is dire for airlines all over the world. Apart from the US carriers, there are talks that Lufthansa might seek state aid as well. However, in my view, there is a certain amount of hypocrisy in regards to these requests. All of the airlines in question have complained about the state aid that they claim the "ME3" are receiving (even though this is questionable in the case of EK and QR). Now, as soon as a crisis hits, they are after the same....


Reply
(@Sarah)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 27

Capitalists love capitalism till they need help. Then they all suddenly become socialists.


Reply
(@steve)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 29

Reduced wear and tear, reduced fuel costs, voluntary unpaid days off, low interest rates.... the airlines are fine.


Reply
(@Jesse)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 2

Airlines shouldn’t get a dime. Not when they charge us for a cold turkey sandwich, select a coach seat or check a bag in. We’ve bailed them out before and in return they paid us back by ripping us off. When they’re making billions they don’t care of the customers. United is a great example.


Reply
(@anastasia)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Remember that HUGE campaign Delta waged against middle eastern airlines getting government subsidies?

My, my, how the tables turn....


Reply
(@Emmanuel Ruiz)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 20

NO bailouts for airlines, banks and hotels - NONE!!! Screw you all! after screwing with us...you get NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They can afford to feed themselves...bunch of thieves. Instead, I want all that money distributed to their front line employees who are directly affected and who badly needs those paychecks....No execs, no upper mgmt people gets anything!!!


Reply
(@Thomas)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Smh.....is the situation this bad ??? I can not believe this question is even being asked. The entire travel & entertainment industry has ground to a halt and will remain that way for at least 30 days. Corporations have eliminated all travel. Planes are empty, airports are empty and this thing is going to last for WEEKS. How could this come as a surprise to anyone. Planes were grounded for about a week after 9/11 and most airlines declared bankruptcy as a result. This is expected to last at least 4 times as long if not longer.


Reply
(@Kathleen)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6

To see the credulity, the lack of questioning, the willingness to obey...I'm losing respect for people.


Reply
 Vito
(@Vito)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 47

It’s sad to ser people reacting with their livers in a time like this. Bad as they are, we need airlines functioning. Even if you have to pay for that turkey sandwich or to select a lousy, tight basic economy seat, it’s still better than having no way to fly, not to mention the thousands of employees and the whole community that depend on the travel industry. There is a time to lecture and chastise these companies, but it’s not now. Governments should (and certainly will) help them weather the storm and try to keep this a temporary crisis. Society doesn’t benefits from letting huge, essencial companies going under out of spite, even if that spite is dressed as “principles”


Reply