Here's Why You Don'...
 

Here's Why You Don't (And Shouldn't) Have "Freedom Of Speech" On A Plane

64 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
162 Views
Posts: 39972
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#5340]
wpf-cross-image

This seems to be the month where passengers just can’t for the life of them behave on planes. Yesterday we saw someone removed from a Delta flight between London and New York, and today a passenger was removed from a JetBlue flight that Ivanka Trump and her family were on.

Continue reading: Here’s Why You Don’t (And Shouldn’t) Have “Freedom Of Speech” On A Plane

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


63 Replies
63 Replies
 Bob
(@Bob)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 284

Why is she flying commercial though? It seems that all the Trump kids fly commercial. It is definitely not because they like to keep a low profile!!

Could it be that Daddy Dearest doesn't have nearly enough money as he claims he does?


Reply
 Ryan
(@Ryan)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 147

Oh, he had the freedom of speech to say what he wanted to say. He just doesn't have freedom from the consequences of that speech, as he learned. The hard way.


Reply
(@Hemoglobin)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

Jet blue is racist


Reply
(@Melissa)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 82

Another Crooked Hillary, Bernie Sanders, racist Barack Insane Obama smelly dog----may that unruly man be banned from flying for 20 years.


Reply
(@Melissa)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 82

@Bob

No Bob. Ivanka is not like Moochelle "no hope" Obama that flies to Hawaii with her race-bating entourage on your tax dime, hating whites.


Reply
 Jeff
(@Jeff)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

Guy is lucky the secret service agents with her didn't get physical.

I agree, Freedom of Speech is not a blanket right you get. Can't yell fire in a crowded movie theater, probably can't yell bomb or gun at the TSA checkpoint. And no, the color of your skin doesn't matter. If you're being disruptive they have the right to remove you.

Also note that not all of these incidents happen on American soil. First amendment doesn't apply overseas.


Reply
(@donna)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1579

I've seen people removed from sporting events, movie theatres, concerts, restaurants and even hospital waiting rooms for being "disruptive," all for valid reasons. Some of the worst offenders show up at sporting venues. In those cases it's easy to leave but on an airliner at 35000 feet you can't get away from this nonsense. I'm glad the airlines have wide latitude to police these situations.


Reply
(@Airmika)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 4

Freedom of speech or 1st amendment in the US constitution is applicable only to the federal government in that it cannot restrict speech. Airlines can restrict speech in their private properties just like we can restrict speech in our private properties like our house.


Reply
(@Tim A)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 17

A passenger one row in front of Ivanka heard no screaming: https://www.facebook.com/marcscheff/posts/10157953789185430?pnref=story


Reply
Gold
(@injera)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

As much as I don't like Ivanka's father, screaming at her (really, screaming at anyone) on a plane is grounds for removal. Period.

And as much as I dont like her father, she's allowed to fly with her family in relative peace and quiet.


Reply
(@Jason)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 107

"Can't yell 'fire' in a theater" is not strictly true; aphoristic invocation often reveals nothing more than the speaker's ignorance of American jurisprudence --
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-time-to-stop-using-the-fire-in-a-crowded-theater-quote/264449/

> It is what lawyers call dictum, a justice's ancillary opinion that doesn't directly involve the facts of the case and has no binding authority.


Reply
Diamond
(@jasoncrh)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 624

let's get to the trip reports, please.


Reply
Diamond
(@ivar-nordberg)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Despicable behavior. I am so sick of people like that Trump supporter who was banned by Delta, this guy who went after Ivanka, and that Adam person who deliberately disrupted his flight.

@Melissa -

You're right up there with them. I can easily imagine you huffing & puffing your way down an aisle and going off on one of your psycho political tirades because you saw someone wearing a Hillary tee shirt.

@Bob -

It's not up to you to determine how Ivanka--or anyone else--chooses to travel.

Ok. I'm done.


Reply
Diamond
(@robert-hanson)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

What ever happened to "when they go low, we go high"? Not to mention preventing "triggering" (sic), creating "safe spaces", and advocating "inclusion and diversity"? Oh, I forgot, Republicans are so evil, none of this applies to them.

Just imagine the uproar if someone wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat had done the exact same thing to Chelsea Clinton.

I'm so old I can remember when I was proud to say "I'm a Democrat". Now, not so much. 🙁


Reply
(@Alpha)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 3

I love how Republicans are like 'oh, see? Democrats are just as bad.'

Republicans would shill for Hitler and claim opposition to him is a spoiled brat for, you know, taking issue.


Reply
 Nate
(@Nate)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 39

I'm sorry... Offensive? There is someone out there capable of being offended at everything you might say. Freedom of speech should not be taken away just because of where you are. This is one place I disagree with you deeply.


Reply
(@Kevin)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 234

Unruly passengers shouldn't be removed from the flight, they should simply be tased multiple times until their behavior improves


Reply
Gold
(@tommy-trash)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Richard Marx would have put the kibosh on all this nonsense.


Reply
Diamond
(@tiffany)
Joined: 12 years ago

Member
Posts: 2238

@ Nate -- I get where you're coming from, but there's no "freedom of speech" being taken away here -- those protections don't apply between private parties. For reference, here's the full text of the First Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Now, there are laws preventing discrimination based on who you are, but no private entity has to tolerate how you choose to act.


Reply
 Jojo
(@Jojo)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 145

This is not offensive because the person was promoting the socialist agenda that Trump is evil


Reply
 Nate
(@Nate)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 295

Sigh... when you get on the plane, we all are going somewhere and let do it in peace. That mean, keep your opinion to yourself. I dont want to hear them even I might agree with you. Most of my flights are overseas and I always hope everybody is in their best behavior when I get on the plane. I flew to HKG from SFO the day after election and I really did pray and hope that nobody on the plane was cheering or upset about the result. Lucky, it was a good flight...nothing happen. Thats the way it should be.


Reply
(@Abyssin)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 8

Please just write flights reports..... you are not very good in here, did you heard both of the people involved ? Dont think so.


Reply
 VLB
(@VLB)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 2

Thanks for posting this. Well said!


Reply
(@Garrett)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 216

Sooooooo........Melissa......... How ya doin? Everything good? hahahahaha Just because I feel like this would piss you off: I'm gay and I have nice things and a great job and I'm asian-American and omg I have black friends and white friends and latino friends and all sorts of colors of friends and travel and I win. ^_^ fuck i'm laughing


Reply
Gold
(@injera)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

A few weeks ago on a flight ATL to BOS there was quite a large man wearing a trump hat, a trump shirt and a trump pin in my row. He was watching the inflight tv on CNN (talking about Jill Stein's recount) and speaking quite loudly to the tv. How horrible Hillary was, how Jill Stein is stealing everyone's money. How Hillary is going to jail.

He turned to me and tried to engage me in conversation about Trump. I responded with 'i dont support Trump, let's talk about football instead' so instead we had a nice chat about our mutual dislike for Tom Brady.

Crisis averted. We all need to calm down.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2606

It's amusing, these posts, because some of the comments they attract are like comments one would read on Yahoo.*

*That's not a good thing.


Reply
 Beth
(@Beth)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 6

So ...as this behavior was described I think the person should have been removed for disrupting the flight. I also recall that Trump's team routinely removed folks from his campaign events when they "expressed their opinions" They also denied press credentials to journalists whose opinions they didn't like. Both situations are private person/private entity and freedom of speech doesn't apply--Tiffany is right.


Reply
(@William Y.)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 190

>Why is she flying commercial though? It seems that all the Trump kids fly commercial.

She can do whatever she damn well pleases and she certainly does not answer to you SJW bullies. I did not vote for Trump, but I'm starting to think this is what America needed with all the petulant mini-fascists who can't behave decently towards others.


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 3

This article shows such a lack of understanding of the nuances of American constitutional law. In my opinion, Ben, you should do better research before writing an article like this!


Reply
(@steven-k)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

oh, the "tolerant left" strikes again.
what a bunch of hypocrites.
we won, you lost. get over it, losers.


Reply
(@Speedbird)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 6

So now we have a free speech case before us. Yesterday we hammered out discrimination with the two fellas from New York. Last week we had the big girl getting drug off the plane by the cops.

All of these incidents boil down to one party acting out and getting put in check by the authority figure.

I have been entertained by the social justice types who have made every excuess in the book for their behavior. However, poor behavior is just poor behavior and in the confined space of a flying tube going up to 35,000 feet is unacceptable for safety reasons.


Reply
(@anastasia)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

A+ post, Lucky.

The guy wasn't removed from the plane for expressing his opinion or for "offending" someone. He was removed for being a disruptive a**hole. Honestly, what he was shouting is pretty irrelevant; getting up in a crowded airplane and shouting at another passenger is grounds for removal. How many people want to fly in a cabin for several hours with a dude that's shouting like he's at a rally? He could've been shouting that he likes tea more than coffee and I"d still want him kicked off.

And that's what most airlines' contract of carriage is designed to prevent: people being loud, disruptive, and annoying. Some of us just want to sleep or get work done on our flight, not try to block out some entitled ass.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2606

It seems the man and his husband were both removed from the plane: http://bigstory.ap.org/097c01b3cd784026bf43a0912f09b892

And it seems like the harassment may have started in the terminal.


Reply
(@Raymond Leong)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 7

Only in America! But yeah fully agree with you!


Reply
(@Flyer Fun)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 44

Agree 100% with the conclusion of this post.


Reply
(@tamara)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 8

I see a few commenters expressing classic lib hypocrisy, criticizing the Trumps for flying commercial. Maybe they feel it's safer. Maybe the schedule worked perfectly for them. Maybe they don't feel like polluting more than necessary. Maybe private jets are overrated. Who knows and who cares? Seriously libs, get a life.

As for the idiot who harassed her, according to his husband the idiot was "chasing them down" (them being Ivanka and Jared). This is an incredibly stupid thing to do a) on an airplane and b) to people who are protected by the Secret Service. This goes beyond any sort of free speech, I think the idiot is mentally ill. Why is he raging and why is he unable to control his rage? With his own kid in his arms, to boot! This is so totally crazy. I hope he's arrested, put on a no fly list, and disbarred.


Reply
(@tamara)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 8

Just want to add that I heard this morning that the people on the flight were happy that the idiot was ejected. I don't think there are many people who want to fly with crazies aboard.


Reply
(@William Miller)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 31

Message to clown who was ejected: Sorry for your confusion. It's Ivanka's FATHER who is the moron, not her.


Reply
Diamond
(@joepro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 189

Family and friends aside. I don't like liberals. I don't like conservatives either.
To the few of you on here who understand the issue and are posting rational thoughts (Tiffany, Lucky, Alex, Imperator)-you are a dying breed.. and probably not welcome on the internet. I'd like to think we would have had people who were in touch with reality in our government branches if there were more of you.
Instead, let's just go start screaming at everyone. Seems to work for everyone else.


Reply
Diamond
(@jasoncrh)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 624

I'd just like to see trip reports, which is why I come to this site in the first place. and I also miss the credit card reviews as well.


Reply
(@fellowtraveller)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Just about nothing posted or commented on regarding the Constitution and free speech has been correct.

Please, please try not to make people more stupid. It's not a good thing.


Reply
(@RobertB)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 8

Same thing goes on a Ship. Disruptive passengers can be arrested by the Captain, and handed over to the police at the next port. What the police do with the the passenger is entirely up to them, but the Ship leaves with them no longer on board.


Reply
(@Applejax)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 21

I really gave her an ear full when I caught her hitching last week too! LOL Jetblue? Please! I thought they were cracking down on fake news!


Reply
(@Martin)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 330

I've seen a number of real-life politicians on my travels, and somehow I have always managed to avoid criticizing their politics when I did, even when I didn't like them.

It's called - maturity. Doesn't matter whether it is on a plane or on the street. Grow up, people.


Reply
 RR
(@RR)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 33

@OhmyGodtheInternetIsWinning -- well, don't leave us in suspense. If Tiffany's statements about the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech aren't correct (though I think they are), then please provide us with the correct information.


Reply
(@Jonathan)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 36

This guy deserved to be kicked off the plane, but it's not hard to understand how he felt. Ivanka Trump's father is a piece of shit, a disgusting race-baiting narcissist with a severe personality disorder who has now been entrusted with our nuclear arsenal. Fuck you if you voted for him. I'm not going to pretend it's normal or that he deserves any respect whatsoever.


Reply
 Nate
(@Nate)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 295

@Jonathan Be careful you might get on the no-fly list.


Reply
(@Petter N)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 81

Michelle - please take your racist views and crawl back into the gutter.


Reply
 Josh
(@Josh)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 94

@ lucky - I know I'm not alone in saying that I don't come to your site for gossipy social media-driven-frenzied news, Internet lawyers galore, and political rants (admittedly, I wouldn't say YOU are ranting, but these types of posts certainly invite ranters); I come here for your trip reports and credit card reviews. The Garuda tip - great. The Hilton category changes - also helpful. But this post (and the boycott Delta post, and the two "professional idiot" posts, and the fat chick getting drug off a plane, and the Hillary Bitches post, etc.....) are just garbage. I'd really appreciate you sticking to what makes your blog so successful...

PS - I totally understand that this is your blog and you can do with it as you please. But as a businessman, you surely understand that these types of posts are going to drive eyeballs/clicks/referral links AWAY from you, long term.


Reply
(@Farnorthtrader)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 257

While I completely agree that nobody deserves to be harassed on the plane, on the street, or anywhere else, it is symptomatic of the level of discourse allowed and encouraged by her father and his organization. To a certain extent, this is a case of reaping what you sow.


Reply
(@beijing-barry)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 26

Lucky, agree with @Josh on this one. Garbage stories bring out garbage commentary. Too much of that stuff and your blog will start to stink.


Reply
(@Brian)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 270

So funny that people who voted for Hillary thought she had the whole election locked up. Now what, have you all lost hope? Are you going to go cry to Mommy and Daddy? If yiu can't accept trump as YOUR president then get the hell out of MY country. I didn't vote for Trump. But I'm sick and tired of the passing and moanjng from Hillary people. She lost. Get over it. Move on. Or better yet, get a one way ticket out of MY country.


Reply
(@William Miller)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 31

Brian,Brian,Brian. Chill dude! People are just upset that a moron was elected leader of the free world. As time goes on and we understand more of what he's about everyone will settle down. For example, today he came out for more nuclear weapons, even though leaders from both parties have been trying for years to decrease the number of weapons. See? Everything will be fine!


Reply
 KDC
(@kdc)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

People don't seem to understand the First Amendment. You can't be sanctioned by the government for the content of your words unless it is a call to action. (To kill someone, etc.) That doesn't mean a private entity cannot sanction you. (Throwing you out of a private business or an airplane) That said, nobody has the right to accost or harass anyone regardless of who the are or their person beliefs for one. And Ivanka has a right as anyone does to fly commercial or private. And to bother her in front of her children? It takes a special douchnozzle to think that is even remotely acceptable. I'm glad the tossed this clown off the plane. Good for JetBlue.


Reply
(@Alex Kim)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 30

Maybe there should be separate 'red' and 'blue' flights .. at least on busy routes 🙂


Reply
(@Shucks)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

Apparently all "libs" are exactly the same--a sentiment supported by many pro-Rump supporters here.

It seems equal to think of all {reps, cons, pro-Rump, ill-informed idiots} as sharing the exact thoughts and psychotic tendencies of Melissa, above, in all of that entity's writings.


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 130

Meanwhile in South Korea, there is an intoxicated person who had to be bound for around two hours. His behavior is nothing short of disruptive, or shocking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmkCKnRstMA

(note: extra fun if you understand Korean!)


Reply
 J
(@J)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 52

I can't believe people are for suppressing free speech, that blows my mind. Even on an airplane you have free speech. Saying that you have no free speech in regards to business is incredibly dangerous. JetBlue can kick off anyone they want, but he is allowed to speak his mind regardless.
You can't yell fire on a plane because that's a call to action, not just speech. There is a huge difference.


Reply
 Russ
(@Russ)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 7

Truly in poor taste and she is not her father. But just because you're running for president does not give one license to question where a woman is "bleeding" or to insult anyone. Just another sign of polarization that will (has?) ripped this country a part. Just not appropriate...period.


Reply
(@Esther)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 38

Can't agree more.. keep up the good work


Reply
(@Just Saying)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

Someone above said the following: "Trump’s father is a piece of shit, a disgusting race-baiting narcissist with a severe personality disorder who has now been entrusted with our nuclear arsenal. Fuck you if you voted for him. I’m not going to pretend it’s normal or that he deserves any respect whatsoever."

Typical uncivilized foaming at the mouth left wing rant.

Judging by the following comments many appear to agree with him. “Daddy Dearest”, “Jet blue is racist”, “shrill for Hitler", “moron was elected leader of the free world”, But "just because you’re running for president does not give one license ….insult anyone” (even if they insult you first), and “it is symptomatic of the level of discourse allowed and encouraged by her father and his organization.”

I am sorry, but you guys are intolerant nuts. Calm down. Try not to hyperventilate. Go to your safe space. In the meantime, I think I will take my rabies shots, cross myself a couple of times, and hope that is enough.


Reply
(@Jeeves)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 1

Another nasty moonbat lawyer who likes to prey on women.


Reply
(@fellowtraveller)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@RR:
I wasn't specifically referring to Tiffany, and that's why I said "just about nothing."
Take for example Aimrika:Freedom of speech or 1st amendment in the US constitution is applicable only to the federal government in that it cannot restrict speech.
This is not true. For example it applies to all state public universities.

A full discussion would better be had on a law blog. I have a problem with people thinking they know more than they do and then posting it as fact. It makes people stupider (and yes, "stupider" is acceptable grammar).
I also have a problem with posting snippets of the Constitution and then an assertion of what they mean without reference to case law. It's sort of like the Tea Party relying on 3 words from the Declaration of Independence.


Reply