Turkish To Lease Tw...
 

Turkish To Lease Two Malaysia A380s?

26 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
150 Views
Posts: 39746
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#2928]
wpf-cross-image

Literally a year ago today I wrote about the rumor that Turkish Airlines would be wet-leasing four A380s. At the time, the rumor was as follows:

Continue reading: Turkish To Lease Two Malaysia A380s?

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


25 Replies
25 Replies
(@patrickj)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Do they paint and refurbish the cabin to match Turkish Air Colors? If so, who is responsible for this bill? Any idea how much "renting" an A380 costs?


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2537

This is a smart move.

MS needs to get rid of the A380s code red.

MS has also made clear that they will be rationalizing their fleet, and they've said out loud that they are considering abandoning long-haul (most if not all) and focusing on regional operations, letting their alliance partners handle long-haul inbound and outbound flights.

If MS is to survive, this is a very smart thing to do.


Reply
 Ben
(@Ben)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 3

MS stands usually for Egypt Air, so I guess you mean MH ?


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2537

@Ben

Yes, thank you, I meant MH! 🙂


Reply
(@Rhona)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 7

Have you flown on Asianas A380? They weren't in the list at the end?


Reply
 Dax
(@Dax)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 331

"He’s one of the brightest guys in the airline industry, and I certainly don’t envy his job."

Is there anybody's job you do envy?

"He’s an excellent 'crisis manager'"

Maybe we should wait to see if/how he is able to turn around MH before we hand over the accolades. Personally I cannot imagine a path forward that puts me on one of their aircraft. Both their company and their country have taken a huge hit to their credibility. You can get away with running a lousy airline in the lousy US market but in service focused areas like Asia you better be on top of your game if you want to succeed. Even before these disasters MH didn't seem to know or care how they compared to other Asian carriers and suffered numerous forced cutbacks as a result.


Reply
 Joey
Diamond
(@joey-4)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1215

I flew CDG-KUL in MH F late 2014 and the ground services for MH F in CDG were quite poor given F and J passengers didn't have priority access in the security and immigration lines (whereas other airlines's passengers did!)
I do hope TK leases 2 A380s and my guess is they'll send them to China.


Reply
(@philip)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

So..how will TK use the MH's F seats? Will they sell them rather cheap like LH does with some of their old F-Seats? (F-Seat, but just regular C-Service)


Reply
(@abdel-rahim-abdallah)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0

@TravelinWilly @Ben - When he said MS had to get rid of their A380s, I was like "I wish they had some".


Reply
(@DavidB)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 154

Doesn't surprise me. I flew one of MH's A380s from HKG-KUL (a real mis-use, but better than sitting on the tarmac at KUL between morning arrival and evening departure to/from LHR/CDG) and it was pretty empty in all cabins, two of us in F (both on awards), a smattering of folks in J/C, and lots of open seats in economy. Even before its unfortunate loss of two 777s, MH was having problems filling its planes. Buying A380s was more an ego decision than a rational business one for this carrier. It has few routes that could sustain such an investment...which was only compounded by its bad luck last year.

Depending upon the routes TK would put these planes on, it could bring back F as it did when flying Jet's 777s with the F cabinets...the same ones TG later took over for a while. Or either modify the cabin by installing business class seats, or just offering the F seats to its top tier elites as many airlines do when flying F cabined planes on J/C premium only routes.

MH is a curious parallel to the fate of its country after the split away of Singapore. That country blossomed and boomed, as did its airline SQ, leaving Malaysia and MH in the dust due to its slavishness to crony capitalism and Islamic obeisance.

I still have no qualms about flying MH, and have since its unfortunate losses (I was on the same flight that vanished a week prior). It's crews have been pretty good as I have tired from the ever-present FAs on SQ, so pretty good is all I ask for. As for safety, when my number's up, it will be up...at 200K flight miles a year who can say otherwise?


Reply
(@Veejay)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 11

Just got off the phone with THY. We are on the SFO-IST-SFO flights in May, in Business. Was given seat assignments in Row 5. I was told there's a second section to Business class with rows 5, 6 & 7. I was assured this wasn't Economy Comfort. However, none of the seat maps anywhere depict this second section. I wonder if this is new equipment? Agent said it's still a 777.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2537

Regarding cutting long-haul operations, see one article here for one example: http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-08-26/malaysian-airlines-gets-ready-to-shrink


Reply
(@jerry)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Veejay
That'll be TK's new 777 (77B) with 7 rows of Business-class. I see them on the IST-ORD as well

Funny enough TK doesn't even list 77B on its own website, only way to see Seat Plan is to do a dummy booking


Reply
 Dan
(@Dan)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 196

MH should seek "synergies" such as JVs with its OW partners. I've flown a few segments on regional MH routes, particularly on a trip into eastern Borneo as part of a Oneworld Explorer award (RIP) with AA. On that segment, I flew KIX-HKG on CX, then HKG-BKI-SDK on MH/MASWings. The MH J product on the A320 was quite nice, and beats anything a US-based carrier offers.

But if you're bleeding cash... well, I could just as easily have flown CX on the HKG-BKI route. MH fills some great OW niches in Malaysia, and ought to capitalize on that. Which means not flying the same routes your partners do. Long Haul isn't MH's strength, I mean they just don't have much of anything to the US from KUL. CX offers so many more options that MH is just a flash in the pan, not to mention that HKG is a more optimal connection point than KUL is coming from most of Asia.


Reply
 Ben
(@Ben)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 19

I doubt TK will bother attempting F with only 2 planes - its too much hassle and investment. They'd be smarter offering the F seats with J service for a slight premium on the normal J class (say USD500 per flight?).

I would hate to be in charge of maintenance at TK - they operate so many different aircraft type. If they add A380 and 787 they would have to operate the most different types of any European carrier wouldnt they? A318, 319, 320, 321, B737, B738, B739, A330, A340, B777, A380 and B787?


Reply
 Ken
(@Ken)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 159

Yay, comments are back!

So this is like renting a car, but on a much larger scale.


Reply
(@Chisness)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 18

Jerry,

When are the 777s starting IST-ORD?


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 174

To understand MH, one has to understand Malaysia. Malaysia is a country that is a racist monopoly, everything is split along racial lines, there is no meritocracy, the chinese and indians that make up the rest of the country are treated like 2nd and 3rd class citizens, starting from school and up to places in university and jobs. So what do you end up with? A country run by monkeys patting themselves on the back and giving jobs to other monkeys. This poor guy taking on the job is not gonna be given free reign to fix whatever problems MH has.


Reply
 Jay
(@Jay)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 174

@Ben why are you referring to TK as a European carrier? Are they in the EU? no... just being on the continent geographically does not count in my book, it is a savage little country.


Reply
 Al
(@Al)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 481

MH also flies their A380s to HKG, do they not?


Reply
(@noah-sprenger)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@Jay - Would you consider SWISS to be a European carrier? Because Switzerland is not in the EU. Why does "your book" not classify a country as European unless it is in the EU: Ukraine, Norway, Switzerland, and several other EUROPEAN countries are not in the EU. That would be like saying the USA is not in North America unless it is in a Union with Canada and Mexico.

Also, what are you accomplishing by calling Turkey a "dirty little country"?


Reply
(@Cagri)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 1

@Jay

Greetings from the savage little country , XOXO


Reply
 mt
(@mt)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 5

Apparently leasing A380s is not enough for MH to cover its losses. Recently MH has decided to sell all 6 of its A380 fleets. 🙁

Check this out : http://www.ausbt.com.au/malaysia-airlines-puts-its-entire-airbus-a380-fleet-up-for-sale


Reply
 Nev
(@Nev)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 1

In AvSpeak - What does the term Wet Lease mean and entail ?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 39746