Full Details: US St...
 

Full Details: US Startup Avelo Airlines Launching April 28

26 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
270 Views
Posts: 39887
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#11871]
wpf-cross-image

Even during these unprecedented times, there are two new US airline startups that are nearing launch. I guess ultimately the timing isnt half bad, since domestic travel is rebounding quickly.

Continue reading: Full Details: US Startup Avelo Airlines Launching April 28

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


25 Replies
25 Replies
(@Rspiro)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 1

I mis read the title and thought this was about aero.com (another new US/EU) airline 😛


Reply
(@Peter)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 841

This actually seems like a solid business model. Obviously it's a low cost airline so YMMV, but on the surface it looks like fantastic news for those who live "off-the-beaten-path". I have a friend who lives in Eureka and it's an absolute nightmare for her to fly anywhere. Now it could be 1 stop to most locations.


Reply
(@Hilton Shumway)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 14

It's about time an airline started making checked baggage cheaper than carry-on baggage!


Reply
(@D3kingg)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 1707

The routes seem bizarre. Living in Los Angeles for ten years there are plenty of people who live in the Hollywood area that would prefer to fly out of BUR instead of fighting the LAX traffic but these are people going to SFO , OAK , SJC , LAS etc. Maybe that’s the goal ultimately.


Reply
(@Sel, D)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 990

Santa Rosa for outdoor recreation? Wine tasting I suppose...


Reply
(@stogieguy7)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 334

Burbank is a very convenient airport for many LA-bound travelers and these destinations are very interesting choices. The frequencies involved pretty much dictate that these will be mostly leisure routes; however, this is a great option if you need to get to/from one of these smaller cities to LA at a reasonable rate and in a fairly large jet (for these markets).

One example that I'm familiar with: Ogden, which would serve travelers from N. UT (north of Salt Lake City). This airport is a convenient place, with cheap (if not free) parking and convenient access to I-15. It's a much easier trip than going to SLC if you live anywhere from Layton northward - including Brigham City, Logan/Cache Valley, and even far SE Idaho. People do travel to Southern California from these areas. Grand Junction would be a little different in that it's a standalone that already has some regional service. However, this is mainly to hubs on regional jets - so again this is service that fills a niche that's currently underserved.

Not as familiar with the dynamics of places like Pasco/Kennewick or Redmond, but I'd imagine that the dynamics could be similar to GJT, only with Alaska/Horizon dominating those markets.


Reply
 Juan
(@Juan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 77

@D3kingg These routes are likely for people who live in these smaller cities that likely don't have direct routes to the LA area, let alone any cheap ones. It's very similar to Allegiant's model with many of their routes out of Vegas, Phoenix-Mesa, Florida, etc. I doubt people in Vegas and Phoenix were interested in flying to places like South Bend and Cedar Rapids, but people in those smaller cities would be more inclined to take a ULCC directly rather than having to drive to fly out of Chicago or have a layover in Atlanta. After all, the airline is being started by the co-founder of Allegiant, though let's hope Avelo has a better maintenance record than Allegiant had with its MD-80s.

Since they only have 2-3 planes and will likely aim for fast turnaround times, they should be able to squeeze into the limited gate space at Burbank. My guess is they'll share B4 with Spirit, as they're only operating to/from BUR on Fridays and Sundays at the moment (might increase post-COVID). IIRC, B1 is Delta, B2-B3 is United, and B5 is Alaska, and they are usually rotating planes in and out throughout the day. Nearly all of A is Southwest with A7-9 being rotated between WN, American, and JetBlue.

The new Burbank terminal can't come soon enough! I know it will have the same amount of gates, but it should also be a bit more flexible as some gates are too short for even the 737-800. But the people downwind of BUR keep holding it up because of noise complaints.


Reply
 EC2
(@EC2)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 196

Looks like they have a sound plan. Great airport and going to niche markets where they really won’t have a ton of competition.


Reply
(@Reaper)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 198

@Sel, D "Santa Rosa for outdoor recreation? Wine tasting I suppose…"

Probably not.

Unlike Ben's contention that "And we’re not talking about some inconvenient airport that people are willing to fly out of if the fare is low enough" Santa Rosa IS an inconvenient airport that some SF residents might be willing to fly out of to LA if the fare is low enough.


Reply
 Juan
(@Juan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 77

@Reaper Santa Rosa alone has a population of almost 200,000, and the surrounding area gets that up to over 200K. The flight isn't for people who live in SF but rather those already in Santa Rosa who would rather take a direct ULCC flight out of their home airport rather than drive to OAK/SFO. Might be tough to fill a 737, but with prices low enough (and may service a few days a week rather than daily), it could be enough to fill the planes in both directions (with people in LA perhaps wanting a more direct route to wine country).


Reply
 snic
(@snic)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 1122

Santa Rosa isn't just a gateway to wine country. From there you can access the entire northern California coast - Marin, Sonoma and Mendocino counties especially. It's a beautiful stretch of coast with lots of cute b&bs and outdoor activities like hiking, mountain biking, etc. Most of the other destinations on the list are similar - it's almost as if they sat down and said "where would someone stuck in the LA area want to fly to for a weekend of outdoor recreation?"


Reply
(@DCA Will Always Be "National")
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 249

@Reaper:

Perhaps for it's inconvenient for SF-based flyers, but Sonoma County (and beyond to Mendocino County) has a lot of potential in O/D traffic. There's a ton of wine money resident in them thar hills/vineyards as well as folks with weekend homes. It's not a coincidence that UA, AS, and AA all had flights from STS pre-COVID. And SFO is inconvenient for a lot of North Bay residents that don't want to slog down the 101 and deal with SF traffic. Of course, will that wine money fly an LCC? Remains to be seen.


Reply
(@ovacikar)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 118

@Hilton Shumway

Spirit already charges less for checked bags ($39) vs carry-on ($45)


Reply
(@Reaper)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 198

@Juan, @DCA Will Always Be "National",

Either you're kidding yourselves, or your North Bay boosterism is showing. The population of Marin/North Bay/Wine Country is tiny compared the pop south of the Golden Gate & south/east of the Richmond & Carquinez bridges.

This is a "young Southwest" ULCC play for attractive fares at a somewhat inconvenient airport for the vast majority of people in the area.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 1

Is it avelo, avelo air or avelo airlines (livery, website, reporting name) ?


Reply
(@Bryan)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 2

This is amazing. I love going to North Coast but the drive is brutally long. It will be great to be able to get up to Santa Rosa. That means I get to take advantage of my wine club memberships in Sonoma 🙂
Also, interesting option to get up to Arcata/Eureka. This is another beautiful gem of the California coast with redwoods, rivers, etc. Spent some time there last summer and fell in love with the area. I wish more LA people left their SoCal bubble. There used to be a United (I think?) daily direct service to there from LAX, but it looks like that got the axe because of COVID.


Reply
(@Steve)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 1

I hope the airline is very successful and prospers. It success will lead to jobs is the sepplemtal companies that will benefir from the air travel.


Reply
 Juan
(@Juan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 77

@Reaper look at some of the routes Allegiant operates, like South Bend, Fort Wayne, Toledo, etc. These cities are the same size or a even smaller than Santa Rosa. Do you think people in Florida or Vegas want to travel to those towns? Nah. But people in those cities do want to travel to Vegas, Arizona, or Florida on a nonstop flight rather than driving to Chicago or Detroit, let alone taking a regional flight to have a layover elsewhere. That's the demand Avelo is trying to capture.

They can look at the data and see how often people from Euguene, Santa Rosa, and other places are looking at traveling to LA to begin with, and see if they can capture that demand with no competition. And by offering cheap fares, they can also create demand that wasn't there. This is how ULCCs have been successful in the past. It's literally the method Allegiant used when it started. I don't know if they will be that successful, but the founder does have a good history in the airline industry to making a profit so maybe he can make it work.

Also, I'm not even from or live in Northern California, I have no reason to defend it lol.


Reply
(@Scott)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 64

@Reaper I don't understand why you are so adamant that Santa Rosa is a bad idea? Sonoma County alone has a population of 500,000 people. And for many people in Marin, Napa, and Mendocino, STS is more convenient than SFO and OAK. Not to mention it's a joy to fly in/out of STS, with cheap, convenient parking and much smaller crowds.

All the big airlines fly regional jets to cities and towns that are much smaller than the 750,000+ people who live within an hour drive of Santa Rosa. It's a totally viable airport and that's why we've seen Alaska, American, and United growing there. It's also in the center of a major tourism area, so there is a lot of interest in flying into the area from other parts of the country.


Reply
(@Mark in Tasmania)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 40

I thought airlines used those algorithms that estimate route demand by looking at online booking services to find underserved markets. I think a lot of people assume people sit down around a desk and throw random point to point destination ideas around until there’s consensus. I think it’s far more analytical and fact based. Just a guess.


Reply
 Bill
(@Bill)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 2

This is going to be tough. You have to sale a lot of seats every week all year long. These markets will have small numbers at times. So it will be hard to cover cost. Probably won't make it for long but I hope they do.


Reply
(@Dan Landis)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 1

I live in San Francisco - I think I might want to drive up to Santa Rosa Airport and then fly down to Burbank for the day. less than $50 round trip sounds like a good deal!


Reply
 Lexi
(@Lexi)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 5

I live in SLC, UT and would definitely fly out of Ogden to Burbank in order to save $$.. BUT I’m not a fan of Allegiant, so I will probably wait to see Avelo in action before I book anything.


Reply
(@Fharda)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 1

I live in SLC area. If the airline can stay on time and not cancel flights, I think there will be a good flow of interest from the SL area to Burbank. I prefer flying into smaller airports with less traffic so this might be a great deal. Getting ready to book so I will see. Plus the $10 checked bag is a reasonable add on.


Reply
(@ALEX THOMPSON)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 6

According to Avelo Airlines 24 Hours Cancellation Policy, air ticket cancellation would be applied if the flight booked within 24 hours without any cancellation charges. If an Air ticket is reserved by any outsider travel service, via the web or offline medium, travelers would be charged a help expense cancellation. Visit our site to know more about the free cancellation policy.


Reply