American Selling Fl...
 

American Selling Flagship First Dining Access (Price Reduced)

86 Posts
29 Users
0 Reactions
198 Views
Posts: 39799
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#10535]
wpf-cross-image

Recently I wrote about how American is selling Flagship First Dining access as a trial, and it looks like they’ve already reduced the cost to do so, from $150 to $100 per person.

Continue reading: American Selling Flagship First Dining Access (Price Reduced)

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


85 Replies
85 Replies
Diamond
(@david-7)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1023

At the quality of that DFW breakfast you had? They can't pay me to eat it.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 54

No Lucky, it’s not logical; it’s devaluing the product for whom it was created.

It shows they’ve got a crap First Class and have over-invested in a facility whose capacity far exceeds demand.


Reply
 Gene
Diamond
(@gene-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ Ben -- If you have several hours and are interested in drinking large quantities of Krug, I guess this makes sense. Otherwise, no way. I really hope they don't allow a bunch of morons to use this for the sole purpose of guzzling Krug and then acting like idiots.


Reply
(@smitty06)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 33

My first 2 experiences at Flagship Dining at JFK was great, but the last time was abysmal. They didn't have many things on the menu and the food they served was burnt or cold. Just terrible. They did invite me come back another day. I can't imagine how outraged someone would be if they paid $150 for what I received that day.


Reply
Gold
(@rich_az)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

My view is that nothing at an airport is going to be high quality food wise. I reluctantly get something to eat when I have to but paying $150 for airport food isn't in my plans.


Reply
 liam
(@liam)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The food at this 'restaurant' is not good......but marginally better than flagship lounge buffet........the thing I value here, however, is the space......especially the booths, even if you are traveling solo. For people paying $150 to enter, it is not a good value. For the folks who are paying thousands on a ticket, this is going to diminish the experience, as it is nice (right now) to have a quiet space with table service.


Reply
 Alex
(@Alex)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 2

No one on earth is paying $150.00 for flagship dining. $50.00 a person maybe at best if I could put a price on it.


Reply
 Jojo
(@Jojo)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 145

@ lucky maybe if this was the first class lounge for AF at cdg or the first class terminal at FRA. BUT 150$$ for just food @ dfw. AA has lost they damn mindjojo


Reply
 jack
(@jack)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 28

Not being smart, but do American Airports really have such awful dining options that $150 into Flagship first seems like a good idea?


Reply
Diamond
(@abidjan)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 321

$150? !? LOL


Reply
(@MikeyInOregon)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 28

AA must be out of their mind to charge $150 for admission, I can't image anyone would pay for that. You can have a fabulous dining experience elsewhere for less than that.


Reply
(@Biz Guy)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 28

Everyone is again missing the actual business case here.

American is probably banking on the fact that a large percentage of the people utilizing the Flagship Lounge, especially when only including Concierge/EP, are business travelers.

As a business traveler, your valuation of the cost of the meal is not compared against your wallet but the size of your per diem. Factor in the WiFi and quiet nature of the club vs the other restaurants at the airport and the $150 cost is nothing.

Hate to break it to all of you but airlines, especially in the US, are here to make money and they do that by catering to road warriors not credit card enthusiasts.


Reply
(@farnorthtrader)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 255

@Biz Guy, who the heck has a $150 per diem for one meal? Let me know what company is giving that kind of coin for a single meal. I want to short their stock.


Reply
 J
(@J)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 425

Insane! Just charge $50 to concierge key members on top of 4 free passes a year and call it a day!

EK charges $100 to access J and $200 for F lounges in DXB.

This is the problem when you run your airline from hillbilly Fort Worth!


Reply
 LM
(@LM)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 95

I mean, how much does Etihad charge for access to Residence lounges? How much does Emirates charge for access to their Business and First Class lounges at DXB? I'm pretty sure the latter is $300 for a coach ticket to a top tier First Class lounge. Meanwhile this is half the price for someone who already has access to the lounge but just gets a better dining experience.


Reply
(@dc9703)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 7

AA is going to get crushed at DFW based on the dining part of the experience. If i had $150 (my money or per diem) to spend on a meal at DFW airport, i think there are at least 5 other places i would go to first. Unless i had 5 hours and wanted to get piss drunk on Krug.


Reply
(@Patty)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

We were offered dining at $150 each at DFW Flagship when flying to Buenos Aires. Can’t imagine doing that.


Reply
 Mark
(@Mark)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 147

They clearly set a price that wouldn’t diminish the value much to the people on eligible tickets. Everyone complaining here are people who wouldn’t pay $150, but if they can find 5-10 people a day to do it then it’ll help offset some of the lounge costs without flooding it with people.

I think this is actually a decent idea to test the waters without purposefully opening the flood gates.


Reply
(@Kacee)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 160

$150 is absolutely stark-raving insane.


Reply
Diamond
(@stanley-c)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 890

$150? Does AA think that they are a Michelin one or two stars restaurant?

$150 plus tip as it is in America and it is a “sit down” restaurant.

AA=Absolutely Abysmal.


Reply
Gold
(@kevinsac)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Like many things in life .... I can afford it but I’d never pay it.


Reply
 Ak
(@Ak)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 59

Ah. Wait till the next recession. The current points, credit card perks, exuberant premium class products have not faced a recession.

Look for this to become a priority pass lounge with the next downturn.


Reply
(@J lin)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 7

If you are taking PAL, philippines just cancelled to Taiwan with immediate effect. FYI.


Reply
(@trancexplant)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The price is downright comical. I've eaten at Flagship First Dining in Dallas and thought it was pretty good. But it was upscale café good, not Michelin star restaurant good. So its value, even when accounting for airport pricing, isn't more than about $30. One available beverage - that most people won't even order - doesn't change that.


Reply
Diamond
(@travelinwilly)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 2563

“Those members can purchase access to DFW Flagship First Dining for $150 per person.”

LOL!

TYPO!

You said $150 for lounge food!

LOL!

Oh.

This is...I’m embarrassed for American Airlines.


Reply
 Gene
Diamond
(@gene-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ BizGuy -- If you worked for me and atyempted to expense this, you'd be in hot water.


Reply
(@mangoman-2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

The decimal point in the admission charge needs to move one, maybe two, places to the left. Then I'm in! 🙂


Reply
(@AlanD)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 242

This does seem like a ridiculous price. Then remember that some people pay $59 for an Admirals Club day pass to drink bottom shelf non-brand piss drinks and eat pretzels and burnt chocolate chip cookies...


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6145

@Biz Guy

Your idea is right but for the wrong reasons.

Hardly anyone can expense a meal that expensive or would pay for it.

The key here is hardly anyone.

They are cashing in on excess capacity without diluting the experience. They probably do it not to make profit but to offset operating costs. Having few customers a day would probably pay for daily wages.

The target is likely not anyone here who complains about the price. It's how many people who actually pony up for F without using upgrades. Those who doesn't fly Flagship First not because of price but because AA doesn't offer it.


Reply
(@frank00)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I'd rather go to the restaurant next door, get a nice steak and a glass of champagne for $60, and save $90.


Reply
 JZ
(@JZ)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 52

been to the JFK lounge a couple of times, I would probably pay $100 if I had more than 3 hours to kill right at lunch / dinner time.
The food is very nice and of course there is the Krug.


Reply
Gold
(@dselby)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Mark is the only one who gets it. People splurge on vacation or when trying to impress colleagues/clients - and this could make a lot of sense for the right layover. $150 is chump change for a lot of people - just look at the price of Super Bowl tickets...


Reply
 Timo
Diamond
(@timo)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 373

My initial thought was how outrageous $150 sounds then I remembered that I had 3 hours to kill yesterday evening at LAX and paid $68 for two glasses of champagne and some olives. So, no comment...LOL


Reply
(@Icarus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 2562

$150 per person is ridiculous


Reply
(@chuck berlin)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 30

Another AA joke showing just how clueless they are and how it is getting worse- they are simply out of control on all fronts

$150 PER PERSON?? Someone like me who pays their own way wouldn't think of it and any business person could never get something like this through accounting unless they were "billing the client" (in that case they would be flying FC)

i was in the JFK and LAX lounge 2 weeks ago - the burger in the JFK club was very good and it was a great experience however the LAX club was HORRIBLE.. terrible service and marginal food (both dishes)

Maybe extending vouchers to EXPLATS would help - max price is $50 -anything to keep us from flying the coop -


Reply
(@PotatoMan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

Everyone saying $150 is high has forgotten that paid FC International R/T typically ranges from $12-18K.


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 14

$150 to use the Flagship lounge including F dining? Maybe. But just for the incremental meal, not until they earn 2 Michelin stars.


Reply
 Ww
(@Ww)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 91

Recently had good experiences in the Flagship Dining at MIA and JFK. Food good. Loved the Flagship Signature Lemonade! However don't think it is worth the $150! (Would rather stick to the normal lounge amenities.)


Reply
(@Julian)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 25

To everybody here laughing and mocking, AA is clearly banking on the fact the odd person will come in and do this and it is likely that exactly this will happen. A few people here and there and that's all they seem to be shooting for so if that works out, who is laughing then? You put a high price tag on anything to make it "exclusive" and someone will pay it. How many Audi's or Mercedes' do you see with the $10K audio upgrade over the already perfectly good standard stereo? Or how many iPhone 11 Pros do you see on a daily basis? In both counts, I see lots every day so I have zero doubt some people will pay for the exclusivity of the more quiet space and I bet the food itself isn't even the main reason.


Reply
(@Oleg Kafarov)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 9

Air France increased the La Première lounge access fee from €300 to €500 to manage demand - and it’s still selling like hot cakes!


Reply
Gold
(@tommy-trash)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I wonder if this is reimbursable as an airline expense on the Amex Platinum or Ritz Carlton card.


Reply
(@mariusea)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Remember that some people pay 10K for a F ticket, and many more pay 5K for a biz ticket. Why is 150 USD a bad price concidering you could have many hours in a better lounge area?


Reply
 Mike
(@Mike)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 406

@Biz Guy - not to mention people's vanity. Look at me, I'm in a $150 lounge.


Reply
Diamond
(@dlptatl)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Granted I'm a Delta loyalist, so I have no experience with my airline providing a true first-class lounge; however, isn't this whole cash grab yet another insult to AA flyers??? With the lack of 1st class pax, this was a dumb idea anyway, but wouldn't it make more sense to provide complimentary access to top-tier elites on routes where they're in biz and no 1st is available? It's not the pax fault that AA doesn't offer AA on most of their international routes.

As an aside, I'd rather hit the buffet at a SkyClub and buy a bottle of Krug using some skypesos.


Reply
 Andy
(@Andy)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 92

$150 annually perhaps... but per visit? LOL


Reply
(@steve__cc)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

You all realize AA has the right to make money and this lounge/flagship dining is for people who actually spend a lot of money on travel and not milage hackers. There are plenty of people who would pay for this access to get some peace and quiet during a long delay.


Reply
(@santastico)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1473

LOL!!!!! AA is out of their mind. With $150 I can have an amazing dinner in my place of choice. And for Krug, I rather drink that at home. Seriously, AA keeps descending.


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6145

@DLPTATL

on routes where they’re in biz and no 1st is available?

Then you will get tons on false positives who would never pay for F but flying a non F route and will piss off the real paying F.

In SkyClubs you can use your pesos for a bottle of Dom. Too bad the buffet doesn't have any good pairing for such an elegant drink.

It seems thing blog doesn't have any high rollers (except @Endre)


Reply
 ed
(@ed)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 15

My company doesn't pay per diem any longer, but they do allow $75 no receipt meals. Thus, that's the upper end that I'd pay. But I'm not a snob - while Flagship can be crowded, I find its buffet Lamb to be tender and entirely sufficient.


Reply
(@Regina)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 205

The question whether the flagship dinning is worth $150 uds or not is very relative. Is $150 usd a lot of money for you? If so, it isn't.
Not everything can be purchased with miles in life.


Reply
(@farnorthtrader)
Joined: 13 years ago

Posts: 255

@Regina, I disagree. The question isn't whether $150 is a lot for a person, but what comparable thing could be purchased with that $150. Would you rather spend $150 on this meal in an AA airport lounge or $150 on a meal in a real restaurant?


Reply
 Sas
(@Sas)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 4

@farnorthtrader

I think a good question is whether you'd piss away $150 of someone else's money on this, or a real airport restaurant. Is FFD the best use of a rather extravagant meal allowance? No, of course not. But an airport McDonald's isn't a good use of a normal meal allowance, but I've done it.

If I have the chance to waste OPM on FFD, I'd do it at least once. I've never had FFD before since no one has offered to fly me in long haul F, and AA long haul F isn't exactly an aspirational experience I want to burn either points or dollars on.

Really if money is no object, then the question isn't what else you could use the money for, but whether you want to do it. Sometimes I have $30 and crave chicken McNuggets. Maybe someday I'll have $150 and a desire to go into the most exclusive part of the AA ground experience.


Reply
 Mike
(@mike-8)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I paid $50 to access Flagship First Dining at JFK... However, this also included a flight on CX-F to YVR (plus a few Avios of course)


Reply
 AC
(@ac)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Not worth $15 IMHO let alone $150. I’ve enjoyed Flagship Lounges and found them to have pretty decent food. Also about to get on a long haul flight in a premium cabin where food is the least of your concerns so why would ANYONE pay $150 for this (and I’m lifetime Platinum and prefer American). I mean I’m sure there are people on International first that could eat there and don’t since how much food does someone really need so why pay?? Never will understand it.


Reply
(@Douglas)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

I know many of you will pay whatever I ask, so why not $150? You all suck!


Reply
(@Regina)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 205

@fornotrader. It is a luxury. As said before. Only the bottle of Krug cost $150 usd. This testing is targeting top tier customers. It's not like they want to operate like a restaurant where everyone can walk in an pay $150usd to access. It is exclusive for those elite customers traveling on premium flights. They want to keep it as private as possible.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 411

I love how articles like this bring out a few pseuds who claim that $150 is "nothing" for true shakers and movers, with the snide insinuation that they are those high flyers.

When the reality of course is that they are not but desperately want to be seen as such on a totally anonymous website.

You can't make this stuff up. If I had serious money (and nobody on a site like this does) then I'd not be flying American in the first place.


Reply
 Tom
(@Tom)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 411

Eskimo,

You think Endre is a high roller?

He shows every sign of trying a little too hard to make us all think that.

Which means he isn't.


Reply
(@Steve)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 2

Yet another crazy idea out of AA!

They can't really be this stupid to believe a bunch of people will pay $150 a pop for a meal. Yes, some idiots with a huge expense account will do it, but they're as foolish as AA is and it'll still never fill the place.

If you ask me, AA would be much better off and have less food waste if they focused on customer experience and offered this to all butt in seat business and first traveler's.

AA can't compete in the air on service compared to almost any Intl carrier, but they could try for a good ground experience.


Reply
 OT
(@OT)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 109

Even with the best experiences I have had in FD, there are two problems which make this a bad proposition:
1. It's a dining room, not really a place where you want to lounge for hours. The idea of bingeing on Krug for 3 hours while sitting at a dining table is not as appealing as it may sound.
2. I personally find the decor and ambience well below what you would expect in a fine dining establishment: the materials and finishes are cheap, the lighting is way too bright, and the "art" the kind you buy in bulk for 3-star chain hotels.


Reply
(@Mark4)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 239

If I pay $150, can I ask for a linen tablecloth?


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6145

@Tom

I guess you didn't get my sarcasm with Endre.

While I am certainly not in those realms of high rollers (except @Endre), it doesn't mean I have never enjoy the perks on them.

They do fly commercial, or in your case AA. Sometimes they promise the wife a girls only Dubai trip on the Gulfstream, the son just extended his ski trip on the Bombardier, and the Citation just can't make it to Europe for the meeting. (Based on a true story). That's how they ended up flying commercial (True story).

You are right, those people don't waste time here, it's no fun. They have their own private group page mocking all of us.

For the rest of us here, just the $100 CSR fee increase already made people canceling their cards.


Reply
 JJ
(@JJ)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1

I'd give it a shout for 10 bucks


Reply
(@DC Yukon)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 78

They should have waited to announce this until April 1st. That way, when they realize it’s a GINORMOUS flop, they could say it was an April Fool’s Day joke. Sadly, the timing just makes them look like fools. Even at $50, it’s still a joke.


Reply
(@Dwondermeant)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 548

Their food has been disgusting for 19 years now and only gotten much worse since penny pinching Parker came on board
Their catering is a national disgrace
No way
Even free of charge I’d considering paying to go elsewhere


Reply
(@rtbones)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I think the market here is pure business traveler, not necessarily the leisure or mileage traveler. I also think it is still $25 too high. Most places I have worked have had a $75 no-receipt rule. Also - Krug in quantity aside, for that much money, I would expect a linen tablecloth at a minimum. Finally, even allowing for the Krug, this isnt exactly the place I'd want to sit and imbibe for a few hours.


Reply
(@SloMan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 16

I get that AA believes that there is a segment of the captive US F traveler segment willing to pay $150 for a quiet space with mediocre food at best. But how does AA think they can get away with charging $150 to the many international oneworld F travelers connecting through AA's hubs - when these same travelers get treated to free true restaurant quality food in the F lounges of CX or QR. Another letdown vis-a-vis their truly upscale oneworld partners!


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6145

I take my word back. AA is up to no good.
For $150 I don't think it would dilute the experience.
For $100 AA is on the edge of screwing people in Flagship First.

Just by dropping the price within a few weeks show AA isn't testing to compensate operating cost. AA is doing this out of pure greed (and bad ops planning).

Time to kiss Krug goodbye.


Reply
(@DaninMCI)
Joined: 14 years ago

Posts: 399

$150 is too high. $100 is also but I could see a few people splurging at that price point. The main problem is that the food just isn't that good to justify the price. I think this could still see some success in places like NYC, LA or Dallas where the general cost of goods is high anyway. (Or Charlotte where the stores selling snacks and water are criminally expensive). Maybe if they would have mocked up these lounges like a first-class cabin with aircraft seating and rolled it out as that experience I could see a lot of people paying for this for fun.

Overall it's just a symptom that AA doesn't know what it's doing. They invested a lot of money and effort into remodeling the Flagship lounge experience yet have very few first-class (3-class) aircraft. So unless they are going to sell a lot of access to other high-end carriers AND expand first-class flights it will never pay off. On the other end of the spectrum, they are cramming seats into aircraft, Spirit style, on a race to the bottom (I do like to fly Spirit but I pay for what I expect). It's like going into a car dealership to buy a new car. You can buy a Porsche or Mercedes and enjoy the first-class service, free snacks in the plush waiting room while they do everything thing they can to treat you well even if they are fixing something and it cost more. Or you can go buy a Yugo and have to pay for wifi, buy your own coffee out of a machine and have to sit in folding chairs in the dusty grime filled area sitting next to a broke college student while they nickel and dime you on repairs. You might get what you pay for but if the Mercedes dealer starts selling Yugos and the whole experience is moved over to the Yugo building to save money and increase revenue or even level the playing field (thanks to Bernie Sanders) then why would you pay more for a product that is the same experience.


Reply
 JRMW
(@JRMW)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 183

I’ll be an outlier

I might pay $100 for Flagship first

Airport restaurants are often packed and loud
Luggage everywhere
Seats too close together
And they’re not cheap

We were just in JFK at one of those restaurants where you order off iPad
Just downstairs from the Delta sky club

Ordered a cheap bottle of sparkling wine
2 sandwiches
2 salads
Total with tip was I think about $140

Food was bad, and we were crowded in a loud terminal
Kids screaming, people bumping us
Terminal was a dump

I’d pay $60 more to get us into Flagship First
Or just go to Mickie Ds next time

We are pretty well off but aren’t into flashy spending
For instance, I find it interesting when people say how “cheap” it is to buy domestic first class tix
I find they charge $100/hr flight time. That ain’t cheap to me

But some days I’ll splurge...
Like buying tix in J from MSP to FCO this fall cause I can find zero awards

Likewise I might rarely do this


Reply
(@jan-s)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Hmm you guys seem to be missing the one-off usecase here.
As Lucky already mentioned:
$150 for an open bar with top notch champagne / wine / liquer + unlimited dining?
I have spent more in a mediocre steakhouse with 3 glasses of mediocre wine.

I'll take that bottle of Krug, eat until I burst and call it a day.

But honestly: If I had the time and wanted to get hammered -> I'd buy access.


Reply
 JBM
(@JBM)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 89

They’re delusional. In comparison, $100 would get you a full meal at Classified in Newark!


Reply
(@santastico)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1473

Lol!!! Economics 101. Price elasticity. Nobody budged for $150 so try $100. I guess the right price would be $50 but even then I wouldn’t want to eat there.


Reply
(@alonzo)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 863

I'd pay $100 strictly to drink a bottle of Krug over a 2 hour period. Says a lot about me, I know.


Reply
(@Fraser)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 39

@Lucky - wonder whether this would count as an airline credit for Amex purposes? I don't know if we have any datapoints for that yet.


Reply
Diamond
(@dlptatl)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

My guess is that now that they're trying to generate revenue from the FF Dining Krug is probably also on its way out as soon as their supply/marketing agreement expires.


Reply
 Marv
(@Marv)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 31

This will work. $100 is reasonable for the business traveler who doesn't want to deal with your greasy, screaming brats. American cheapskates(aka, miles hackers) whining in this comments section are comical. if not tragic. LOLz.


Reply
Gold
(@mkldh)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

If I understand correctly, this offer is only for those who already have access to the Flagship Lounge? Then the value proposition is different from $150 or $100 for a meal: the buffet and alcohol offering in Flagship Lounge are definitely not high-end, but should be more than sufficient if you are just looking for a replacement to regular restaurants in the terminals.


Reply
 EC2
Gold
(@ec2)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

@ Marius .... you are on it. Their market is not people that are trying to fly first or business on points! $150 is nothing for someone shelling out $5k to $10k for a ticket.


Reply
Gold
(@jamie-3)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

$100 to drink a bottle of Krug and a meal. I’m in.


Reply
(@dylan)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I think they’ll eventually settle on offering this for $100 only for passengers flying in business class on transcon or long haul only. This will preserve the quiet environment.

If on a long enough layover it’s absolutely worth it to me given how crowded the flagship lounges get. The large table at LAX is a great place to work for a few hours. I do wish the flagship lounges sent the OneWorld Sapphire members to the Admirals Clubs instead but I realize that wouldn’t be competitive.


Reply
(@Crosscourt)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 418

This airline never ceases to amaze me on how poor they are. Seriously, charging for the rubbish they serve and restricting it to their so called 3 cabin 1st class passengers. You don't pay extravfirvthe first lounge on qantas or emirates or concorde lounge for example and they're streets ahead. AA should pay usbto use their dining... Whats it called flagship Dining ?


Reply
 Ivan
(@Ivan)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 8

If they offered this to gold members when flying coach I'd do it for $100. A bottle of Krug and a meal before a transcon. I'm in!

Only forty more than I'd pay (50+20 tip) having a meal and a couple glasses of wine in a restaurant.


Reply
(@Ben S)
Joined: 16 years ago

Posts: 30

This is super annoying of me to point out, but your phrase "Starting a couple of years ago, American gave Concierge Key members two invites per year to Flagship First Dining" uses 'invites' as a noun, when 'invite' is a verb and the correct usage should be 'invitations.' I'm so sorry to be so annoying about this, I am.


Reply
(@aerov53)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 0

The people claiming that $100 is a worthwhile price for a dismal and incrementally better restaurant experience over the lounge itself are the same people who said $150 was a worthwhile price only a week ago. Trying to stick to a point regardless of the data. 1.) Not everyone drinks. 2.) Not everyone before a long haul flight wants to get drunk af on Krug just to say they got their money’s worth. Do business travelers even desire to get drunk in a lounge or a plane when they have to work the next day with limited or reduced quality of sleep?


Reply