Uganda Plans Gargantuan New Airport With VIP Runway, Horrible Logic

There are a lot of optimistic airport projects out there, with very questionable logic. However, this might be the most baseless airport proposal I’ve ever heard of. Goodness gracious, I really hope they don’t light money on fire in this way (thanks to Sean M. for flagging this)…

Uganda unveils optimistic mega-airport concept

There’s a new proposal for the development of a new mega airport in Nyakisharara, Uganda, named Mbarara International Airport. According to the proposal, construction could start soon, and the airport could be completed by 2030.

This wouldn’t just be a modern airport, but it would be one of the biggest in the world, even bigger than Ethiopia’s new mega-airport, which ultimately supports the continent’s biggest airline. So the airport would be able to accommodate north of one hundred million passengers per year, and the airport premises would take up 21 square kilometers.

Per the proposal, the airport would feature two 5,500-meter runways, the longest commercial runways in the world. Not only that, the airport would have a 3,700-meter VIP runway, because… well… I dunno, it makes no sense, you tell me.

So, what’s the argument in favor of this airport? After all, Uganda has a small national airline that loses a bunch of money, so why would you suddenly build a mega airport? The argument is that demand between Brazil and China is increasing, and Uganda would be a logical refueling stop for flights between the countries given that it’s essentially right on the way, greatly reducing travel time between the regions.

Interestingly, private firm Base Seven Company is behind this concept, and Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni has directed Ugandan Prime Minister Robinah Nabbanja to support and fast track this proposal. Per the letter:

I am writing to direct you and all the concerned Government departments, to help a Company known as ‘Base Seven Company’ to implement a mega transport project at and around the Government Aerodrome of Nyakyisharara, near Mbarara.

Why such a big airport at the hitherto remote area of Uganda? It is all on account of the hitherto unknown factor of the way the Globe was arranged by God and the new phenomenon of the unfolding global affluence.

Two parts of the Globe are very crucial in connection with this issue. These are: Latin America, especially Brazil, and China. These two zones of the Globe are now trading and communicating with one another. However, their route of communication is wholly irrational and uneconomic. Yet, if somebody were to come from Brazil, refuel at Nyakyisharara, it would take him 20 hours of flying time.

The Company will use their own money to do the developments and recover that money by charging the users of the Airport and the accompanying facilities, such as the hotels they will build there.

I love the “it is all on account of the hitherto unknown factor of the way the Globe was arranged by God and the new phenomenon of the unfolding global affluence” comment, oh my.

Below you can see a video about the proposal. By the way, I love the planes featured in the video, especially a little before the one minute mark. Are those… China Southern Boeing 727s, or Tupolev Tu-154s, or…? I also like the cameo of the imaginary Air China Airbus A380!

Nothing about this concept makes any sense

I’m not trying to be a jerk, but this truly seems like the worst airport concept we’ve ever seen.

Okay, let’s go with the premise that there’s increasing demand between China and Brazil. That’s absolutely true, and there’s no denying that Uganda has good geography for the purposes of a refueling stop. But even if that’s the case, it doesn’t make the concept any more logical.

The most obvious issue is that Addis Ababa has equally good geography with a strong, dominant airline, and we’re seeing a mega airport built there as well. So what competitive advantage does Uganda offer, over Ethiopia’s more well established operation?

Uganda has good geography between China & Brazil

Next, the scale of this just seems completely off. Okay, let’s assume we live in a fantasy world where this all works out. How many daily flights does the airport really expect to see between China and Brazil? The renderings show literally dozens and dozens of planes belonging to Chinese airlines on the ground, parked at gates. That kind of volume makes no sense.

For that matter, I feel like the people behind this project are kind of missing the point. If the idea is just that Uganda is a refueling stop, it doesn’t matter how nice the terminal is, or how many gates you have. Refueling stops typically just consist of passengers staying onboard as the plane is refueled, often parked over in a remote part of the field.

Uganda just being used as a refueling stop also limits the upside in terms of the economics, since it’s not like this will necessarily hugely develop the country’s economy. If a vast majority of passengers are simply transiting and staying onboard the aircraft, the upside is much limited than a new airport that greatly grows local passenger numbers.

What’s so bizarre to me here is that there are reportedly private investors behind this concept, and the country claims it won’t have to directly pay for this. I’d be fascinated to see the money trail for this project.

Uganda doesn’t exactly have a good track record with aviation. National airline Uganda Airlines (where both long haul planes are currently grounded) might just have the worst margins in the industry, as the carrier’s losses last year amounted to roughly 50% of total revenue. Talk about some subsidized airline tickets!

And not to keep ranting, but a VIP runway? Say what? That’s stranger than when the founder of imaginary airline Global Ghana Airlines claimed the launch would be delayed because they accidentally hired low altitude flight attendants instead of high altitude flight attendants.

Bottom line

Uganda wants to build a huge new airport, with the goal of capitalizing on travel demand between China and Brazil. Okay, Uganda has good geography for those purposes, but despite that, nothing about this concept makes sense. What are all the gates for? What’s the point of a VIP runway? What’s the competitive advantage over Ethiopia?

What do you make of this Uganda airport concept?

Conversations (34)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

gmabs Guest

Spot-on!! I made a similar comment on Opera News and I was told it does not matter bcoz the investor money is not from Uganda. It made me think of the many incognito airfields in the DRC whose mainstay is to smuggle minerals out of the Congo! Are we with following suit with these so-called investors? I would rather ask those investors to funnel their money in other pressing issues like flood control and public transport system in Kampala. I still maintain that this is a matter of having clueless officials in public sector. For instance, we have suffered with floods since time, but I bet you, if you asked any official at KCCA or the pertinent ministries to show you a comprehensive project plan to curb the floods, you will not get anything! Isn't this being clueless? They think they know it all! The least they could do is open the design to Ugandans to competitively design the project for financial gains...you will see people coming from the unemployed wings! But if you are to depend on goons who sit in offices from morning to afternoon whatsapping, drinking tea and reading newspapers, you will never move this country forward

0
‼ 0
jomu Guest

I have not read any positive comment about this new airport,Africans with their Lugezi gezi will never take u s anywhere.If the airport is constructed can't it reduce the distance someone travels from from UK or US or Germany to go and trek primates in Bwindi NP ,or visit Queen Elizabeth NP or Kibale forest NP?why can't we think along those lines

0
‼ 0
Elijah Guest

But another thing is China has great relations with Uganda, I may be a bit biased given that I am a Ugandan, however, I think Uganda and China relations are better than Ethiopia China relations and the Ugandan aviation industry is not under ground just yet. Ironically, Uganda airlines hired the former head of operations at Ethiopian airlines, which I think was a great choice given the history with the carriers previous CEO. Claims are that since she was Ugandan, it was easy for her to be persuaded by fellow Ugandan businesses in procurement processes. But with the New CEO a great turn around is expected, and the new airport in Nyakisharara is a great addition to the airline if it is able to strike a deal with the Chinease operators. One of my rather greater worries from this project is actually the control and financing system chosen, I think it is great for the Chinease to fully fund and operate it, but this will just cause a raccus for the country if the benefits are not well assessed in terms of profits for Ugandans. As per the passenger traffic, routes between the USA and Australia through Africa can get strengthened and other routes like Central America to South East Asia would also get stronger. The passenger number may not be a big issue, it is generally the geopolitics behind the airport that may come into play.

0
‼ 0
Barbarella Guest

Addis' current airport and the new one incur payload limitations on account of altitude. But this new projet is less advantageous than the Entebbe airport. The reality is that China-South America great circle distances are all in the ballpark of 9.5-10k nm. ADD has an efficient hub which ensures fast transit but segment length and airport altitude limit efficiency. A 2 stop itinerary would be necessary to maximize efficiency and stay in the 3000-4000 NM air freight sweet spot. The ME3 airports have a great location as a first stop from China (geopolitics aside), another seaside hub would be required in the gulf of Guinea, LOS, ABJ or ACC would be good candidates from a location perspective. ADD and 1-stop ME3 would lead on speed but such a 2 stop system with a ME3-Gulf of Guinea trunk route would win on flight economics ability to finely serve the whole south American market. But let's be honest, the market is not big enough and the framework conditions not good enough in those 3 airports for such a system to work.

0
‼ 0
John Guest

Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka: I built a brand new international airport in my hometown in the middle of nowhere, and now Forbes Magazine calls it "The World's Emptiest International Airport". Museveni of Uganda: Hold my beer, son... TravelinPenis of OMAAT: There's gotta be a way I can bring Trump and my micro penis into this conversation...

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published