Korea Adds Law To Limit Airline Crew Radiation Exposure

Here’s something we don’t often see addressed, even though it seems like it should be of concern…

Korea’s new flight attendant radiation limitations

Korean’s nuclear safety agency has just added new regulations that are intended to minimize the exposure that flight attendants have to cosmic radiation. Flight attendants on international long haul flights are subjected to the most radiation exposure, so that’s where limits are being put in place.

Specifically, Korean airlines will have to roster flight attendants to ensure that they aren’t being exposed to more than six millisieverts (mSv) on an annual basis. Since there’s the most exposure to radiation on long haul flights, airlines may have to roster flight attendants differently, especially if they primarily operate long haul flights.

Furthermore, the new law mandates that flight attendants receive regular education on radiation, and undergo health check ups.

These new regulations are already in effect, and any airline found to be violating this new rule could face a fine of of up to six million won ($4,638). I would assume that fine is per incident, or else that doesn’t seem very high.

Korea has new limits for how much long haul flying crews do

I’m surprised this concern isn’t more common

While this isn’t a topic that I’m very knowledgable on, I’m surprised that the subject of airline crews being exposed to radiation isn’t discussed a bit more, and that we don’t have more laws regulating this.

Most studies I’ve seen put airline crews at much greater risk for cancer, particularly melanoma and other skin cancers. Yet often it seems that discussions about this stop short of actually doing anything that could impact change.

Science is far from my strong suit, so with Korea’s new law, I was curious just how much exposure six mSv would be, since that’s the new limit for crew. Based on my searches online, it appears that six mSV is the typical radiation doses received by flight attendants often flying long haul polar routes.

Since that’s right at the limit of Korea’s new regulations, I suppose that this could impact some of the flights that certain crew members are able to take.

Long haul flights subject crews to the most radiation

Bottom line

Korea has just added a new law that limits the amount of radiation that flight attendants can be subjected to. Airlines have to ensure that flight attendants aren’t subjected to more than six millisieverts (mSv) on an annual basis.

Based on my understanding (and someone please correct me if I’m wrong), that’s around as much radiation as the average flight attendant working long haul flights could be subjected to. So this could cause airlines to change how crews are rostered, perhaps mixing more short haul and long haul flying.

What do you make of Korean’s new law limiting crew radiation exposure?

Conversations (30)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Freddy Pointspanda Guest

Sorry if this is a really silly question but would wearing sunscreen protect you against the radiation? Isn't that what sunscreen is made for or is this radiation different then UV radiation?

0
‼ 0
Virgil Guest

The 6 mSv limit in flight is unjustifiably low. Even when being on the safe side, 20 mSv/year is more reasonable. A single chest CT scan is 6 mSv. An astronaut spending 6 months on the ISS receives 70 mSv. Radiation workers are permitted 50 mSv/year. Cosmic radiation is a non-issue compared to the radiation received from smoking, yet the Korean Aviation Authorities aren’t regulating that. In short, that new rule doesn’t make sense.

0
‼ 0
Bagoly Guest

Several of those long-term studies do point out that there is a very likely effect from leisure activities associated with the occupation (crew on those twice-weekly long-haul flights to sunny holiday destinations tend not to sit inside all day) and a quite likely one from the cosmic radiation, but separating out the two is tricky, especially for long-term studies using data from the days when most people were not aware of risk from sun exposure.

0
‼ 0
Karan Guest

@Lucky https://xkcd.com/radiation/

1
‼ 0
Andrew Diamond

I'm wondering if the incentive here isn't to "schedule less", rather it would be to increase shielding on the plane to reduce radiation for flights. It would likely add weight, so this needs to be regulatory than random goodwill from KAL.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published