China Bans Protesting Cathay Pacific Employees

As just about everyone is probably aware of by now, there have been huge protests in Hong Kong for the past couple of months. I love Hong Kong and I think it’s pretty clear where I stand on this, though I won’t chime in any further because I know how the comments section can get sometimes.

Well, the South China Morning Post is reporting on how China is now looking for a new way to exert control, and it involves Cathay Pacific.

The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has informed Cathay Pacific that as of Saturday, August 10, 2019, they’ll have to restrict what crews can fly to China. Specifically, staff who took part in “illegal protests,” “violent actions,” and “overly radical activities” wouldn’t be allowed to operate flights to mainland China.

Furthermore, as of Sunday, August 11, 2019, Cathay Pacific will have to submit identification details of all crews on all flights that use mainland Chinese airspace. So this isn’t just restricted to crews operating flights to mainland China, but even those overflying China enroute to other destinations would have their details submitted to the Chinese government

If Cathay Pacific doesn’t comply then they’ll no longer be allowed to use Chinese airspace.

According to the statement:

“The CAAC has issued a severe aviation risk warning after numerous recent incidents exposed safety risks by Hong Kong Cathay Pacific.

Recently, a Cathay Pacific pilot involved in violent activities was charged with rioting but the person was not suspended from flight duties. There was also leakage of passenger information with malicious intent. These have had an adverse social impact and increased the possibility of aviation risks spreading from Hong Kong to the mainland.”

For now, Cathay Pacific has issued the following statement:

“We are treating it seriously and are following up accordingly.

The safety of our passengers is always the top priority of Cathay Pacific. There is zero tolerance for any inappropriate and unprofessional behaviour that may affect aviation safety. We deal with these incidents very seriously.”

I’m curious to see how this is dealt with. One of the major concerns here is how open-ended this is. It’s obvious that lots of Cathay Pacific employees are participating in the protests (lots of flights have been canceled because of this), so saying that staff that took part in protests shouldn’t be allowed to fly to mainland China sure puts a lot of people at risk.

How is Cathay Pacific supposed to determine who all participated in the protest, and what happens if it’s found out that someone on a flight to mainland China did in fact participate in a protest?

What a mess… and just a week later it was announced that Cathay Pacific’s CEO is resigning.

Conversations (128)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Scott Guest

Good Riddance. Cathay asked for it. How can their management be so dumb and irresponsible. They need to pay the price for their stupidity, endangering the lives of travelling passengers: it’s plain common sense – pilots and air hostesses are not supposed to engage in any such anti-social activities that are in direct conflict with their day-to-day jobs. Airports are a virtual home for pilots and air hostesses. There is no better example of a direct conflict of interests. It’s incumbent upon any Airline employer to immediately fire any of their airline employees who participate in such anti Govt rallies associated with rioting, arson and destruction of public property. Not doing so, geometrically increases the risks to all flights and their passengers. These airline personnel have direct access to security areas within the Immigration area and to critical areas on the aircraft’s in which they fly. What’s to prevent delinquent airline personnel from carrying out sabotage or acts of terrorism. Today it’s protesting and rioting at the airport terminal, tomorrow these radicalised nut cases could carry an offensive weapon or explosives on to the aircraft. Simply cannot be tolerated. They are free to resign from their jobs and become professional rioters. If not they should be fired forthwith and banned from the airlines. Senior management at Cathay who didn’t display simple common sense and responsibility to allow this to happen should also be placed under scrutiny for their sheer incompetence. Don’t blame China for Cathay Pacific’s mismanagement and downfall. Chinese authorities, CAAC had already given CX the choice. Don’t fly into mainland China’s airspace and CX doesn’t need to comply with their directives. This was very clearly stated. Their country, their law.

0
‼ 0
Anthony Guest

Goes to show businesses should always stay out of politics. You should never bite the hand that feeds you. It's really just common sense. China certainly has a legitimate security concern here. Flight security should never be taken lightly. Who knows what the staff or pilot can do to sabotage China and its people? I don't think China is being harsh here. It's just pure stupidity from Cathay Pacific to allow its staff to protest publicly and leak customers information out (in this case, the customers were the Hong Kong Police soccer team).

0
‼ 0
Simon Diamond

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/transport/article/3023129/rupert-hogg-resigns-ceo-cathay-pacific-airways

0
‼ 0
Charlie Guest

@Lucky any thoughts on the closure of HK airport?

0
‼ 0
Bo Guest

Totally reasonable to ensure the safety of passengers. If Cathay Pacific does not comply, it may be denied usage of mainland China airspace, which surrounds HK.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published