President Trump has announced that Visa cash back credit card rewards can soon be deposited into Trump Accounts, thanks to a new platform. Say what now?!
In this post:
Visa partners with Trump on credit card rewards
Today, Trump announced Visa is creating a new platform that will allow credit card holders to deposit their cash back rewards directly into Trump Accounts. Here’s how Trump explained this development, during an announcement:
“I’m pleased to announce that Visa is creating a brand new platform which will allow credit card holders to deposit their cash back rewards directly into Trump Accounts. That’s a big deal. Where’s the head of Visa? Thank you very much, Visa.”
“These initiatives couldn’t come at a better moment, because there’s never been a better time to invest in the United States of America than right now. Who knew it would’ve happened this fast? I inherited a mess, we were a country that was laughed at a year and a half ago, we were laughed at, now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world, nobody even close, so who knew this was going to take place this quickly?”
Wait, what on earth are Trump Accounts?
What’s actually going on here? The “Trump Accounts” branding makes this sound like you’re depositing money directly into Trump’s account, or something, or like he’s launching a bank. Or like you’re buying Trump or Melania meme coins…
However, that’s not quite what’s going on here. Here’s the explanation of Trump Accounts on the IRS website:
The Working Families Tax Cuts allows parents, guardians and other authorized individuals to establish a new type of individual retirement account for their children, called Trump Accounts. The account is for a child who has not turned age 18 before the end of the calendar year in which the election is made and has a valid Social Security number.
The account features a pilot program contribution of $1,000 for children born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028, and who are U.S. citizens with a valid Social Security number.
So branding aside, the idea is that this is just a savings account for kids, and for a limited time, newly born children can receive a contribution of $1,000. The idea is that you can contribute your credit card rewards to grow this account.
That’s actually not a radical concept, as there are even several credit cards that specifically are intended to contribute to savings accounts for children. Of course the branding here will no doubt be controversial, though.
So yeah, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with this, and it seems like a fine initiative. I’m not sure it’ll prove that popular, but giving people more options to contribute credit card cash back toward a savings account for children is a win-win.
I will say, I am curious how this plays into Trump’s threats to cap credit card interest rates at 10%. He said he’d require that for a year, and that if credit card companies don’t comply, they’d be “in violation of the law.” It seems like not a whole lot has come of that, so I wonder if Visa getting onboard with the Trump Accounts concept is intended as a way to smooth things over.
Bottom line
Visa cardmembers will soon be able to deposit their cash back credit card rewards into Trump Accounts, which are savings accounts for children. Giving cardmembers more options to contribute cash back to their savings accounts for children seems like a good thing. I’m not sure this will move the needle much on anything, since it’s not like people couldn’t have done that before, but…
What do you make of this new Visa Trump Accounts concept?
How do I participate if I have no children but still want to divert all my cashback and wages to Trump's account?
Just buy his crypto. Even if you had kids, they'd disown you by then anyway.
why are trump simps and trump himself so much like mean gays from the 80s?
macho macho man....
Wow there are some brokies here posting. I’ve literally saved 1000s of dollars into the stock market in a few years (using a rewards card). This is an amazing program, and honestly I hope it gets expanded to phase out social security in time.
You're missing the point entirely, Tim. Nobody disputes you can make money in stocks over time - the issue is valuation and timing. Saving thousands through a rewards card worked because you likely started during a period with reasonable valuations or bought consistently through cycles.
Trump Accounts force 100% equity allocation at 220% of GDP (Buffett Indicator) with funds locked for 18 years and zero diversification. From these valuations, historical returns are 3-5% annually,...
You're missing the point entirely, Tim. Nobody disputes you can make money in stocks over time - the issue is valuation and timing. Saving thousands through a rewards card worked because you likely started during a period with reasonable valuations or bought consistently through cycles.
Trump Accounts force 100% equity allocation at 220% of GDP (Buffett Indicator) with funds locked for 18 years and zero diversification. From these valuations, historical returns are 3-5% annually, not the 10-12% the CEA projects.
The "amazing program" creates guaranteed demand that allows current shareholders to sell at peak prices while children hold overvalued assets through the inevitable mean reversion.
As for phasing out Social Security - Bush tried similar privatization in 2005 at a Shiller PE of 27. Three years later, the financial crisis hit. Trump's plan starts at a Shiller PE of 39. Replacing guaranteed benefits with mandatory equity exposure at historic highs isn't financial literacy, it's generational wealth transfer dressed as opportunity.
Conflating your personal success with a structurally problematic program just proves you doesn't understand the criticism. It's also important to recognize your advantages and that not everyone will get them downstream.
Could you imaging when that kid about to turn 18, and wants to withdraw the money to only find out all the money have gone into the Barron's retirement account.
Barron? I assumed all excess riches will be encased in his Mausoleum, like the pharaohs.
The leader of the Western World couldn’t lead a blind man out of a paper bag.
However, this Farcical ForgetMeNot will lead the world into war in the ME, just to appease the defence establishment and industry.
Donny T is a puppet, directed by incel-minded creeps like Stephen Miller. Of course, few should earn your ire more than the gutless simps in the GOP congress who are at least slightly smarter and are aware of their obligations and ignore them anyway.
Quoth Marco Rubio:
"For years to come, there are many people on the right, in the media and voters at large, that are going to be having to explain and justify how they fell into this trap of supporting Donald Trump."
And to thinks that Trump still calls Biden corrupt....
Erdogan, Putin, all make just a trifle of Trump in corruption
None of them are good for the world.
We Americans... Turks... Russians... Chinese... shouldn't put up with this corruption any longer.
Who would be stupid enough to put their money anywhere near this fat felon's thieving hands?
If you trust this bankrupt sex criminal with your savings, then you deserve to get fleeced.
Do you honestly think trump has anything personally to do with these accounts? If so, don’t use a IRA, 529 or any other government sponsored tax advantaged savings account. Such ignorance.
Oh Thomas. So well steeped in your own ignorance and yet lacking the discernment to correctly identify it in others
Oh, great. Thank god Ben doesn't think "there’s anything wrong with this." Ouch, i was getting worried Trump may not be able to more forward with this. Thank god he now can.
As for the patients in the comments - just spare us. Like Trump or don't like Trump, no normal person cares about your vile mental episodes any longer. Continue boiling in your deranged anguish.
Donny T is the one having vile mental episodes, recently engaging in another late night social media bender, posting 56 times on Lie Social in 60 minutes. As for boiling in anguish, it's Donny T who flips out and looses his temper at even the slightest criticism, and his followers are the biggest crybaby snowflakes in the world. As for Stephen Miller, he's "winning" nearly every fight and he's still miserable AF
Lmao, the guy claims he's not T-deranged by ranting for five minutes straight about T. Appreciate you proving my point.
Your point was not proven, Syd.
However, it is a clever bit of trickery, this TDS. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a rhetorical trap: do something genuinely harmful, then dismiss all criticism as irrational obsession. The label creates a binary where any critique - regardless of validity - gets categorized as derangement, making it impossible to hold him accountable without being dismissed as unhinged. It's an immunity mechanism that keeps supporters in a bubble where Trump is always right and critics are...
However, it is a clever bit of trickery, this TDS. Trump Derangement Syndrome is a rhetorical trap: do something genuinely harmful, then dismiss all criticism as irrational obsession. The label creates a binary where any critique - regardless of validity - gets categorized as derangement, making it impossible to hold him accountable without being dismissed as unhinged. It's an immunity mechanism that keeps supporters in a bubble where Trump is always right and critics are always crazy, regardless of the substance of the criticism. The worse the action, the more useful the TDS label becomes for deflecting accountability.
Don't worry, All Due Respect, we're all still mortal; there will be accountability, in the end, for him and his enablers, even if it takes decades to hunt everyone down, and a few extra trips down to Argentina, like the olden days.
lololol, dudes, you're so genuinely funny. And I very genuinely like you, and appreciate your company.
Does anyone here have anything useful to share regarding this accounts and some of the main characteristics? I have a child born before 2025 so I wouldn't be eligible for the $1,000 contribution from the Treasury, but my understanding is that we could still contribute $5,000 per year until my child turns 18.
-Are contributions tax deductable?
-Is there an income limit that would prevent us from contributing?
-At what age can the...
Does anyone here have anything useful to share regarding this accounts and some of the main characteristics? I have a child born before 2025 so I wouldn't be eligible for the $1,000 contribution from the Treasury, but my understanding is that we could still contribute $5,000 per year until my child turns 18.
-Are contributions tax deductable?
-Is there an income limit that would prevent us from contributing?
-At what age can the child begin withdrawing from the account?
-Are dividends and capital gains distributions shielded from tax while the funds remain in the Trump Account?
-Are withdrawals taxed (and at what rate)?
-Opinions on any advantages to this type of account compared with a UTMA?
-Can we contribute both to our son's Trump Account and UTMA?
Fellow citizen, please, if you want real-facts, consult with your tax-professional (who probably doesn't know much yet either, because this is all so haphazard like everything else your Dear Leader does.)
All of this is available on the website created for them, but:
No,no,18,yes,gains are at normal income tax rates / principal is not, tax advantaged, yes.
Sorry 1990 couldn’t take 5 min to learn about this.
If 'all of this is available on the website,' it is TrumpGambit who should learn, not me.
Time to pop-out 10 kids real fast before the program is ended by the next administration!
If the peasants are revolting against the mad king, when will all be well?
Historically? Not for a while. That said, as far as revolts go, cyclically, that train is never late, friend. Reminder: Try to have better aim than Robespierre.
In case anyone wants to be informed about how the accounts work.
https://www.philstockworld.com/2026/01/28/trump-accounts-for-americas-children-the-newest-exit-liquidity/
Good article, thanks Rosemarie. Trump Accounts mandate equity purchases at historically extreme valuations (Buffett Indicator at 220% of GDP, roughly double the historical mean). The CEA's illustrations promise $1 million by age 28 based on 10-12% annual returns, but such returns historically occur when stocks are cheap (Shiller PE of 10-15), not at current levels (Shiller PE of 39). From today's valuations, historical data suggests 3-5% annual returns.
For the first cohort born 2025-2028 to...
Good article, thanks Rosemarie. Trump Accounts mandate equity purchases at historically extreme valuations (Buffett Indicator at 220% of GDP, roughly double the historical mean). The CEA's illustrations promise $1 million by age 28 based on 10-12% annual returns, but such returns historically occur when stocks are cheap (Shiller PE of 10-15), not at current levels (Shiller PE of 39). From today's valuations, historical data suggests 3-5% annual returns.
For the first cohort born 2025-2028 to realize the projected million dollars by 2053-2056, the next generation must purchase those same stocks at valuations exceeding 300% of GDP, and subsequent generations must pay even more. This creates a chain-letter structure where early participants can only achieve promised returns if later participants accept progressively more overvalued assets.
The mechanism functions as wealth transfer from late entrants (children buying at peaks via locked, non-diversified accounts) to early exiters (current shareholders selling into guaranteed demand), with the collapse deferred until new capital inflows slow or valuations become unsustainable and mean-revert to historical norms.
Has there ever been such an absolute grifter as a world 'leader' before?
The fact that we, as peasants, allow this mad king to keep using crypto as the backdoor to unlimited bribes, foreign and domestic, is wild. *sale on pitchforks*
I am selling the new TRUMP TOILET PAPER. This might be the only trump branded item everyone will want.
Toilet paper? In this economy?
Extremely boring and totally irrelevant rhetoric.
I think Trump should focus on cleaning up some bigger financial problems than credit card interest rates. For example, regulate the student loan companies - control the structure of the deal, areas of study students can get loans for, etc. Suggesting to lower credit card interest to 10% misses the point and would likely encourage people to have credit card debt. The problem with the savings account is the lack of return. Consider interest rates on cash these days.
Or, and this could be a wild swing, he could focus on stopping his ICE stormtroopers from killing Americans
First, Donny T needs to stop deploying his paramilitary ICE force into American cities threatening civilians who peacefully film them and murdering others. Then the rest...
I think somebody should give Trump a course on economics and he shall listen
I’m waiting for the new Stormy Daniels account. You can deposit up to 130k in that one.
Not the content I'm here for.
I'm sure everybody cares about your six words sentences of nothingness.
sic(!)
Don’t Look Up: “No politics, we want the jobs the meteor will bring…”
*meteor kills them all anyway*
For people interested in the financial incentives and rewards from credit cards and traveling I’m surprised at the negativity of having another tax advantaged savings option. TDS on full display.
The concept of TDS is bizarre. If come over to your house, take a big diuretic shit on your living room carpet, urinate on your wife’s face, punch your son, drink your wine, take your brand new car for a joyride, but bring home a load of groceries - do I get to say you have “Me Derangement Syndrome” because you’re not happy to see me?
The reason why people dislike Donald Trump isn’t...
The concept of TDS is bizarre. If come over to your house, take a big diuretic shit on your living room carpet, urinate on your wife’s face, punch your son, drink your wine, take your brand new car for a joyride, but bring home a load of groceries - do I get to say you have “Me Derangement Syndrome” because you’re not happy to see me?
The reason why people dislike Donald Trump isn’t because they are deranged – it is because Donald Trump’s behavior indicates he is. He’s ignored his oath of office, trampled on the constitution, weakened the United States at home and abroad, and his actions have resulted directly in the death of innocent Americans. At this point, even if he spent the whole rest of his life doing only good things, it would not make up for the sheer amount of bad that he’s done.
Almost like you know Donald is chopped, the way you and he came up with the silly TDS label for people who were just rightly justified at him acting a fool most of the time
Yes, you have Trump Devotion Syndrome. Bet you have Obama Derangement Syndrome (ODS), pronounced: odious.
The TDS trolls on here ar over the top??why are so many trvel blogger followers so critical of the right?? It is insane to see this constantlyin travel stuff? what has happened to these peeps?
Why are they so TDS libtardy?
A metastatic derivative of MKULTRA, seemingly optimized for PMC 105-120 IQ Masters+ educated cohort of hecking good people, completely bypassed their psychic immune systems and laid waste to their rational brain functions, leaving them gibbering, pavlovian stimuli-response dopamine junkies
Clearly if you need to buy questionable drugs, 99 Luft Stanzas is your person
@ dee -- It has nothing to do with being against "the right", but the "Reich". I don't understand how anyone can support the gang of mobsters destroying America. If you dont see that, you are just ignorant to the facts.
Preach, @Gene!!
Can I invest in Trump projects like Trump casinos, Trump airlines or Trump universities? Or do I have to limit myself to invest in companies that have a possibility of staying in business?
Branding it with his name is the continuation of his dictatorship. A narcissistic chode. The sooner someone finishes him off the better.
Really, really sick thing to say about a leader of one of the greatest nations on earth
Wrong Thomas. Donny T is a vile human being. And considering recent history, America has a lotta explaining and reforming to do before it retains its former greatness.
Oh please…. his ear .. next time I hope the aim is better. Millions agree. He’s a fascist c.. along with the rest of his junta.
Not necessarily. How about the Roth IRA, named after Senator William Roth (R-Delaware)?
It was Senator Pat Moynahan’s idea to name the Roth IRA after Senator Roth. Moynahan wanted it named after Roth because it was Roth’s idea. Roth did not do it for himself.
Great use of 'chode'... LOL
Thanks Putin!
Why does this tea taste funny?
(So, you’re bringing her back? You didn’t think Rod was enough? I know it’s you..)
That’s a beautiful picture of StrokeFace accompanying this piece. One can practically smell the stench of his full diaper just from that photo.
Gangrene hands… no bueno.
Just as a heads up, if you like this concept wait until the Congress makes a tweak to OB3 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the 2025 tax bill) before contributing anything to a Trump Account.
Under current law, contributions to these accounts don't qualify as a "gift of a present interest" for federal gift tax purposes. That means that a federal gift tax return should be filed if a contribution is made to a Trump...
Just as a heads up, if you like this concept wait until the Congress makes a tweak to OB3 (One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the 2025 tax bill) before contributing anything to a Trump Account.
Under current law, contributions to these accounts don't qualify as a "gift of a present interest" for federal gift tax purposes. That means that a federal gift tax return should be filed if a contribution is made to a Trump Account before the law is fixed.
From a practical perspective, one might not care (in 2026, cash gift taxes don't have to be paid to the IRS until a cumulative $15 million is given during lifetime.) But from a theoretical perspective, there's no statute of limitations on a return that should have been filed, but wasn't.
This issue is likely to receive more attention over the summer at the earliest.
Oprah Trump: “You get (an audit!) and you get (an audit!)… all my political opponents get (audits!)”
GEG_WA makes and important point and also I am not shocked that the Donny T team half assed this one as well
A "Trump Account" is just another name for a savings account, right? Instead of points, the money is automatically swept into the account, right? Are there any fees?
A "Trump Account" is just another name for a small shiny bauble that Donny T and his team think will distract enough Americans from the fact that he and his pack of jackals are robbing this country blind and killing Americans
Everything with America's national crime family is a grift, so definitely don't be participating in this...
It’s a tax advantaged (530A) savings account. You could learn a lot by just reading about them instead of remaining ignorant.
Advice on not remaining ignorant from Thomas. Now that's rich!
Why would that be rich? You didn’t spend any time actually learning about them and instead spent your time arguing with whataboutisms - dragging ICE shootings which are terrible and tyrannical into a discussion about an actual positive thing (another tax advantaged investment vehicle).
A civilised leader would not insist his name is added to savings accounts, the Kennedy Centre, spend millions on a ballroom and turn the White House into a bordello. He’s an authoritarian fascist dictator.
You want facts, Thomas? Trump Accounts are a marketing gimmick masquerading as policy. The $1,000 seed grows to roughly $5,800 by age 18 without contributions, taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gains, with less generous benefits than existing alternatives like 529 plans or Custodial Roth IRAs. The real value requires annual $5,000 contributions that only wealthy families can afford, while funds remain locked until age 18, providing zero help during childhood when poverty hits...
You want facts, Thomas? Trump Accounts are a marketing gimmick masquerading as policy. The $1,000 seed grows to roughly $5,800 by age 18 without contributions, taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gains, with less generous benefits than existing alternatives like 529 plans or Custodial Roth IRAs. The real value requires annual $5,000 contributions that only wealthy families can afford, while funds remain locked until age 18, providing zero help during childhood when poverty hits hardest. The $15 billion cost through 2034 spread across millions is negligible per person. It's wealth transfer for those who already have wealth, sold as revolution.
Meanwhile, the administration has systematically dismantled constitutional governance. Trump signed 137 executive orders in 100 days, fired officials with statutory protections without legal cause, launched criminal investigations into Federal Reserve Chair Powell for refusing political pressure, and deployed 35,000 troops to occupy American cities. Two citizens shot dead by masked federal agents in Minneapolis within weeks. NATO allies dispatched troops to Greenland fearing American invasion. Canada announced the end of its partnership with America. Moscow welcomed Trump's national security strategy as "largely consistent" with Kremlin vision. China and Russia coordinate more deeply while European allies hedge against American unreliability. The trade isn't policy, it's misdirection: pocket change for the demolition of democracy, alliance collapse, and authoritarian ascendance. Shameful.
Well said again All Due Respect; lot of work to do to clean up after all this. Those who care are taking notes, keeping records, and ready to hold everyone accountable, as long as it takes.
At least now Trump is actually paying the children that he's screwing
No, he still isn’t, not personally; the American taxpayers could be, if this ever even happens.
Its happening. Read the IRS webpage to learn more. This is already approved and already on its way. If you spent more time reading anything other than DOC VFTW and OMAAT, you would expand your horizons, but yet here you are every single day.
Sure, another thing that's happening is Americans are getting murdered by Donny T's ICE stormtroopers. But that's ok, because Trump Accounts!
Who said that? You did. Killing innocent civilians is bad. Trump accounts are a great thing. Both things can be true, no?
That is a really weird argument to make.
Oh Thomas. Simping for Diaper Don is not a good look el duderino
"Killing innocent civilians is bad. Trump accounts are a great thing. Both things can be true, no?"
Look at the statement you're making! Trying to imply that the weight of the badness of KILLING INNOCENT CIVILIANS is remotely equal to the weight of a modest savings plan that mainly benefits people who already have money. Talk about a weird argument.
It would be like me walking up and kicking you in the nuts and then...
"Killing innocent civilians is bad. Trump accounts are a great thing. Both things can be true, no?"
Look at the statement you're making! Trying to imply that the weight of the badness of KILLING INNOCENT CIVILIANS is remotely equal to the weight of a modest savings plan that mainly benefits people who already have money. Talk about a weird argument.
It would be like me walking up and kicking you in the nuts and then buying you a cup of coffee. Come on Thomas! Kicking you in the nuts is bad, buying you a cup of coffee is good, right?
The Trump Accounts initiative seems generally positive, I don't see how there could even be a negative spin to this? Tax-incentivized accounts for building households and raising children.
Time to have 10 kids so they can each get $1,000, amirite?
I had a kid in 2019 and have funded a 529 and other accounts since her birth. I believe the same people that support this got pissed off because "I paid for my student loans, why should we pay for other folks loans?!" Isn't this the same concept, albeit on a smaller scale?
All that to say, I don't mind tax dollars funding children's futures. I do think this would be better suited helping a...
I had a kid in 2019 and have funded a 529 and other accounts since her birth. I believe the same people that support this got pissed off because "I paid for my student loans, why should we pay for other folks loans?!" Isn't this the same concept, albeit on a smaller scale?
All that to say, I don't mind tax dollars funding children's futures. I do think this would be better suited helping a young family with early childhood expenses and/or medical bills. Outside of the $1,000, there's not much benefit compared to other investment options out there.
In case you didn’t know, the contributions are after tax and when your kid turns 18, it becomes a typical trad IRA. So you all your gains are taxed as well i.e. double taxed like normal investments. Also max contributions is only $5k.
On the other hand, 529s can be funded upto $19k tax free, and turned into Roth IRA. Way better.
As they say, don’t be fooled by appearances, use your wits.
You’re missing a lot here.
1. The after tax principal would not get “double taxed” on redemption. All after tax redemptions remain after tax.
2. The gains that you may make in this account are taxed at ordinary income tax rates. Should you redeem at 18, what tax bracket would you be in? Think about it for a second.
You're missing a lot here, Thomas.
1. None of this matters if Donny T and his goons keep murdering Americans.
2. None of this matters if Donny T keeps weakening America at home and abroad. Think about it for a second.
Again, a very weird argument to make. Both things can be true that killing citizens for no reason is bad and trump accounts are good. Take off the blinders for a minute.
The negative spin is the the worst president in the history of the US had to slap his tacky cheap racist name on it
Another off topic rant. Just call it a 530A instead of trump account then.
Silly Thomas. I've responded to this modest little program with maximum Trump branding in substance, feel free to respond to that if you like, but don't pretend it doesn't exist
OK, I understand and patly agree with the TDS. The naming is over the top, but should your hatred overcome the possible good. This program could overcome partly overcome the roots of longterm poverty
$1,000 is gonna solve poverty? Why didn’t anyone think of this before!
Doug, it will not do that, and like a wish granted by the monkey's paw, every good thing Trump does comes with enough bad to ruin it
Sickening to consider putting any money in something called "Trump Account".
the folks who will do it are the same ones who deserve to be immiserated so it sorta works out
Unfortunately, the ones who would do it don't have money to put in it.
Then call it a 530A account, cuz that’s the technical name.
Ahh Ben I love the blog, but this post is awful. Giving that ‘creature’ credit is sickening.
Yes Rob, we'll be sure to never give such a nasty, base, cruel and disgusting "creature", such as yourself, any credit. Now kindly, please bugger off with your misguided tomfoolery, bugger! Otherwise, perhaps, Tim Dunn will come over to this comment and derail us again with stories of his "chafed nipples" and his many (what people call) "NIP" "SLIPS". Disgusting. Anyways the point I'm making, "Rob" is not to derail comments with politicism.
Rod
Donald is an empty headed vainglorious ninnyhammer who must have his name on as much as possible now because he knows no one will do it after he's gone
Rod… we know it’s you… c’mon.
(I actually like this alias… it’s subtle… you know, rod, like a hard pole… like a…)
And the Chase Sapphire Reserve card now has a new bonus: Two free tickets to the Melania movie!
*theatre still empty*
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Did you even say thank you?
Christ Ben your need to never bite the hand that feeds you has never been so nauseating
@ JR -- Sorry, I'm doing what now? Are there really any questions about how I feel about Trump? I realize people come to the blog to (mostly) escape politics, but in this case it's something that directly impacts the industry, so it's worth covering. And I try to do so without getting overly political, since that pisses off a good percentage of readers.
Don’t mind the haters, Ben. And those who decry ‘no politics’ are especially insidious as they know it’s all relevant. Travel is inherently political as well. Think of immigration, movement of people, public resources, etc. The answer is more speech, not less. You and the other bloggers are doing a fine job. Thank you.
More pandering to a vulgar fool with a gaping maw where his heart should be, a chasm that cannot possibly be filled even by all the false adulation in the world.
I am of course speaking of myself!
LOL whatever dude, you're not even a good dupe. By all means, keep fellating your orange god tho
Also, you're a really weird person if you're impersonating me in the comments section of this blog. I don't care, no one else here cares, and the name "All Due Respect" doesn't carry any weight, so I'm not sure what you're thinking you're gaining from your sad little stalker impersonation
All Due Respect (OG), take it from me, 1990 (OG), we know the real you vs. the fake, and don’t worry too much about the imposter (he gets board, comes and goes). He’s done Eskimo, Aero, Jack, and others apparently. I guess that officially makes you a regular if he’s riding your coattails too now.
lol thanks 1990 (OG)
@Ben,
The visage and the voice of that man makes me nauseous. Can I suggest to using a visa card instead, if you must have a graphic.
Just to be clear, the AHCA wasn't named Obamacare by the people who introduced it but instead by right wingers who wanted to use the racism of their followers to demonise a policy that would help them at the expense of their donors.
As for this scheme it's cool I guess but unless the returns are very large surely you would just pick the highest cashback card and deposit it yourself?
Racism? Idiot.
《It's a truism in politics that labels matter. When President Barack Obama and his Democratic allies in the Senate and House passed healthcare reform legislation in 2010, they developed an official name for the law that they thought would convey the positive benefits of the bill: "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act." That name has often been shortened to "Affordable Care Act" in the years since its passage, but the bill has also come to...
《It's a truism in politics that labels matter. When President Barack Obama and his Democratic allies in the Senate and House passed healthcare reform legislation in 2010, they developed an official name for the law that they thought would convey the positive benefits of the bill: "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act." That name has often been shortened to "Affordable Care Act" in the years since its passage, but the bill has also come to be known as "Obamacare," a name frequently used by Obama himself.》
Obama initially disliked and resisted "Obamacare" - Republicans coined it as a pejorative during the 2009-2010 debates to make the law sound like big government overreach tied to a president many conservatives opposed.
Obama and Democrats only embraced the term later, around 2011-2012, after it had already stuck in public discourse. The strategy became: "If they're going to call it that anyway, we'll own it and make it a point of pride." By his 2012...
Obama initially disliked and resisted "Obamacare" - Republicans coined it as a pejorative during the 2009-2010 debates to make the law sound like big government overreach tied to a president many conservatives opposed.
Obama and Democrats only embraced the term later, around 2011-2012, after it had already stuck in public discourse. The strategy became: "If they're going to call it that anyway, we'll own it and make it a point of pride." By his 2012 reelection campaign, Obama was saying things like "I do care" and "Obamacare - I like it."
Tremendous! MAGA!
Would you trust ANY account that has Trumps name on it? Not a chance. Another money grab by the Trump team. Who is the bank or fiduciary that holds these funds? What interest rate will they pay on these accounts?
Knowing how this administration defies any and all laws, will these accounts even be solvent by the time any of the kids turn 18 and Trump and his MAGA cronies are hopefully long gone?...
Would you trust ANY account that has Trumps name on it? Not a chance. Another money grab by the Trump team. Who is the bank or fiduciary that holds these funds? What interest rate will they pay on these accounts?
Knowing how this administration defies any and all laws, will these accounts even be solvent by the time any of the kids turn 18 and Trump and his MAGA cronies are hopefully long gone? It's nauseatingly never ending how they figure out ways to line their own pockets.
Joan, I was being impersonated above. (By the guy who’s currently using ‘Rod’) Anyone who follows my stuff knows the O.G. 1990 is anything but MAGA.
“Who is the bank or fiduciary that holds these funds?”
Eric. Don’t worry, we can trust him.
“What interest rate will they pay on these accounts?”
They will charge you 40% per day. But they’ll invite you to join the Global Peace Bureau of Love if you pay them $1 billion dollars.
Jared would prefer $2 billion actually, preferably from the Saudis.
Do you honestly think trump would personally manage or have anything to do with a 503A account? If so, don’t invest in a 401k, 529, IRA, etc. as those are similar in concept to this one. Ignorant.
Donny T doesn't even manage his own diarrhea, so no, obvi he'll not be managing this. He loves to prance around like a fancy boy covered in orange makeup making mean comments about people and directing his servile underlings to do degrading things to themselves and various civilians here and around the globe, then he waddles over to the microphone and takes credit for the few good things that seem to spring accidentally from his misadventure of a presidency.