Admittedly expansion by a Gulf carrier isn’t exactly front of mind at the moment, as the airlines struggle to operate due to attacks by Iran. But still, airlines are making long term plans, and there’s an interesting development, on that front.
In this post:
Etihad greatly expands Abu Dhabi to Chicago flights
Etihad Airways has been flying to Chicago since 2009, and has generally operated once daily service. Along those lines, there’s an interesting update. As of June 15, 2026, Etihad plans to double service, and have twice daily flights between Abu Dhabi (AUH) and Chicago (ORD). The 7,276-mile flight will operate with the following schedule:
EY9 Abu Dhabi to Chicago departing 2:55AM arriving 8:35AM
EY11 Abu Dhabi to Chicago departing 10:00AM arriving 3:40PM
EY10 Chicago to Abu Dhabi departing 2:00PM arriving 12:30PM (+1 day)
EY12 Chicago to Abu Dhabi departing 9:10PM arriving 7:40PM (+1 day)
Etihad will use two-cabin Airbus A350-1000s for both daily flights, featuring 371 seats, including 44 business class seats and 327 economy class seats. Etihad’s A350 business class experience is phenomenal, in my opinion. If you’re curious, the EY11/12 frequency is the new one. The new flight is already bookable.
My take on Etihad expanding its Chicago service
For context, Etihad flies to six destinations in the United States, including Atlanta (ATL), Boston (BOS), Charlotte (CLT), Chicago (ORD), New York (JFK), and Washington (IAD). There are a few things I find interesting here:
- Etihad is the smallest of the “big three” Gulf carriers, yet it will be the only one operating multiple daily flights to Chicago
- Chicago is only the second destination in North America to which Etihad has more than daily service, after New York; and actually, this will now be Etihad’s highest capacity US market, since New York service is operated by a combination of (lower capacity) 787s and A350s
- Etihad is on a huge expansion kick and is greatly trying to increase its number of destinations, so it’s interesting to see the airline doubling service to Chicago, rather than adding flights to a new destination
- Etihad has a partnership with American, so Chicago does have some connectivity, which I imagine is a factor in expanding this service
- Etihad currently “only” has 10 A350s, and this route alone will take up roughly three frames
Bottom line
As of June 2026, Etihad is doubling service to Chicago, as the airline will fly twice daily from Abu Dhabi using Airbus A350s. This is only Etihad’s second route with double daily service, and when you look at overall capacity, this will be Etihad’s highest capacity market in the United States.
It’s interesting to see Etihad be the first Gulf carrier to go double daily to Chicago, since Emirates and Qatar Airways are much bigger, but don’t have that level of service.
What do you make of Etihad doubling Chicago flights?
Yet, it is still not returning to LAX ... sigh.
Hey Ben,
Is there a glitch on the website? I cannot access all of the comments.
Thanks!
Same. It comes and it goes. Tried it on Firefox and Chrome, when it's down.
Same here. I have to click "write a comment" to see all comments. been happening for me the past week or so on safari.
Same
@ OldCrowAZ -- Sorry about that, I'm looking into it!
Just click on the number of responses underneath the headline. I experienced the same issue around 10PM PST last night.
I've noticed it too. Thought it was just me or my phone. Been happening the past week or two, but not consistently. Sometimes have to go in and out a couple of times to read all the comments, even when click on the number. Plus, the scroll seems to get 'stuck' occassionally on any Twitter or similar inserts, and freezes my screen & have to reload from scratch to clear it.
TONE DEAF. Etihad isn’t flying anywhere lately.
not going to be relevant with iranian attacks. UAE is finished.
Nostradamus, is that you?
Nostra-dumbass…
Interesting for sure. Checked if one flight over the other might be a savings in Business class. The second flight is not showing up on Google flights yet though, which would be a bit unusual if already available for purchase from Etihad. Haven't looked yet at Etihad's site directly.
Just out of interest, why do you say (correctly) “attacks by Iran” but never “attacks by israel” in any of your posts relating to the situation?
It’s quite odd…
Just a guess, but perhaps it's because Israel has not attacked the Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, or Saudi Arabia. Israel's attacks, and those of the United States, did not themselves put the gulf state airlines at risk. Iran's response includes attacking those countries. While it may have been foreseeable, it was Iran's attacks, or responses to attack, that put the home airports for Etihad, and others, at risk.
Mark - I don't think it's odd in this context. Israel isn't attacking airports in the UAE, Iran is.
Going by the internet complaints, Etihad seems to be the worst handling IRROPS in the current situation compared to EK and QR. They will have trouble retaining Business class passengers after the conflict ends.
ME3 are the worst when even the smallest thing goes wrong.
Lipstick on a pig. Wait, that's haram.
Lipstick on a camel perhaps.
Smallest thing? Missles fired are just a small inconvenience for you?
But when there is a snowstorm and all US airlines go crazy for days after storm is already gone... that's job well done?
But ORD is losing Southwest so it’s kind of a wash
bahaha got’em
Those flight timings seem off Ben
Qatar did ORD double daily for a while but cut it back. Interesting to see if Etihad stick around
used etihad to fly from madrid to bangkok, big mistake plane broke in the midle of the air etc still waiting for them to contact me
So more *BANG* less kok, huh?
Etihad executives have made public remarks in the past about wanting most of their routes (inlcuding to North America) to be served more than once daily.
I think it was Arik De who made a comment about bumping ATL up to twice daily at some point in the future.
I wonder if they’ll expand their partnership with AA. It seems like it was barely a partnership but Charlotte and ORD lean towards cooperation.
ORD is a sticking point for AA (literally-- can they stick around there). Maybe this was to aid connecting traffic for AA via ORD, rather than another hub they could have chosen. If so, I would call that cooperation.
That's nice. All kind of moot, but good for them - like the plucky but terminally il, enjoying that last make-a-wish moment
Oh sure ? During a regional conflict , so many people will prefer a Gulf airline ?
This is good for the chicago community.
I have not flown the Etihad A350 in business but their older business seats (in the 787s and A380s) I find really hard, and difficult to sleep comfortably on, even with the mattress padding they provide. I hope they have addressed this in the new business class.
They should have featured a first class cabin on one of those flights.
Wish they add SFo as well
EY used to fly SFO-AUH...excellent flight that had proper First Class.