I’m sorry, but I just find this to be absolutely ridiculous (thanks to View from the Wing for flagging this)….
In this post:
American flight returns to San Juan over “RIP” test
On Thursday, July 3, 2025, American flight AA1847 was scheduled to fly from San Juan (SJU) to Dallas (DFW). The flight was operated by an Airbus A321 with the registration code N902AA, with 193 people onboard.
The plane took off at 6:26AM, and flew for a little over 10 minutes, climbing to just over 16,000 feet. However, at that point, the plane turned around, and diverted back to San Juan. It landed there safely just over 30 minutes after departure, at 6:58AM.
While flights return to their origin all the time, the cause of this incident was anything but ordinary. As it turns out, the plane diverted because a passenger observed another traveler receive a text message saying “RIP” (rest in peace), and interpreted that as a threat to her flight. So she reported that to the flight attendant, and it was ultimately interpreted as a bomb threat, causing the diversion.
Once the plane was back on the ground, airport security personnel and the TSA boarded the aircraft, to inspect it and interview passengers. The passenger who received the “RIP” text message was able to prove that a relative had died the day before, and that’s why he was taking the trip.
An airport official clarified that “it was a mix-up that was handled in accordance with safety protocols,” and that “there was no real threat to the flight or its passengers.” The flight ended up departing again at 9:40AM, just under 3.5 hours behind schedule.
Who is at fault for this absurd diversion?
Perhaps hindsight is 20/20, but I think we can all agree that a diversion over a simple text message containing the term “RIP” is ridiculous. But who is really at fault for this diversion?
Of course there’s the snooping passenger, who decided to report this in the first place, and set off this whole chain of events. We always hear the motto “if you see something, say something,” though all too often, that’s used by clueless people to simply make claims reflecting their own biases.
I’d argue that the party really at fault for this diversion is the crew, for taking this seriously. I wonder, did the “concerned” passenger really just share what she saw? Did she tell the flight attendants “hey, I saw someone texting the term ‘RIP,’ I think they must have a bomb?” And then the flight attendant was like “yeah, wow, that’s really concerning, let me call the captain, we need to divert immediately?”
I think this also reflects the “better safe than sorry” approach that so many airline crews take. They’ll never get in trouble for erring on the side of caution, but if they ignore something that ends up becoming an issue, that’s more of a problem for them.
What really amazes me is how quickly all of this happened. The plane started turning back toward San Juan just 11 minutes after takeoff. So during that short, critical phase of the flight, the passenger noticed the text message, alerted the flight attendants, the flight attendants alerted the pilots, and the pilots made the decision to return to San Juan? That’s all very fast.
Hopefully one of the ATC YouTube channels can upload a video about the communication, as I’m curious what the pilots told authorities.
Bottom line
An American flight returned to San Juan just over 30 minutes after takeoff, for a bizarre reason. A passenger was snooping on the texts of a fellow passenger, and saw them receive an “RIP” text. Somehow that ended up being interpreted as a bomb threat, causing the flight to divert. I simply have no words. I’m not sure if it’s worse that the passenger reported this, or that the crew acted on it…
What do you make of this American diversion?
American Airlines crew and pilots do this crap all the time. They receive extra pay for a longer trip so they have $ incentives.
That stupid nosey woman needs to learn to mind her own business and keep her eyes off other passengers' devices. She should be fined and made to pay the cost of the diversion.
Let me start by saying the person snooping also saw the guy texting the flight number they were on prior to the RIP. The real story never comes out. The crew followed proper protocol so all of you people commenting may not really be getting the “full” story as usual. Two flight attendants didnt want to continue feeling unsafe.
@ KER -- How is texting a flight number suspicious? People text flight numbers to others all the time so that they know when they'll land, etc. Is there more to it, or is that it?
When you let hysterical, Cluster B type (mostly women but some men) out in public.
Apparently, unlike the participants in this situation; I need a great deal more information before reaching a conclusion / taking action.
Bombshell no pun intended. The passenger was a Hasidic from Brooklyn.
So? What’s that supposed to mean?
It means that people stereotype based on looks. I'm Indian, and in my youth I once made a trip to Europe while wearing a beard. I was stopped at every. single. checkpoint. I learned my lesson.
Ashok, and what lesson was that? Shave your beard? If they stopped every single person with a beard it would take years to go through security.
I guess this is the kind of person who calls the police to delate others everytime they do something wrong
will this person be sued for this situation ?
Yeah, this is some real warp-speed hysteria.
Reminds me of when Guido Menzio was suspected of being a terrorist for flying with math equations.
At a loss understanding how this happened at lightening speed. Snoop reads RIP, manages to find FA, FA convinces pilot something's amiss and diverts in minutes. Must be a record here.
the lack of due diligence on the part of the crew is beyond astonishing.
Did they ask the passenger what the text meant or why they got it? Shouldn't that be the first action taken? It seems like the crew member just didn't want to work this trip and would rather turn around.
Either way, this gave me a proper laugh. Thank you Ben.