Regulators Order Ai...
 

Regulators Order Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner Inspections

15 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
366 Views
Posts: 40243
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#18111]
wpf-cross-image

India’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has just implemented a new policy for Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet, following yesterday’s tragic crash, which killed hundreds. This seems like a logical enough approach…

Continue reading: Regulators Order Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner Inspections

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


14 Replies
14 Replies
(@betterbub)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 744

Do we know if these checks could have caught VT-ANB?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 40243

@ betterbub -- Since we don't know what caused the accident, it's impossible to say.


Reply
 Dan
(@Dan)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 59

It certainly seems as though the DGCA have some idea that a systems failure of some kind coupled with unclear takeoff procedures may have contributed to the crash. These seem like unusually specific and targeted systems checklists.


Reply
(@AeroB13a)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 3849

No one can fault this action, better safe than sorry.


Reply
(@Indian peeing scorpian)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 386

It will not be the First time,someone in India screwed up! India is seriously having problems with Military & Civilian Planes. losing advance French Jets in a Brief war of 3 Days can offer you a glimpse. It could be too soon to try to become a Fourth world power, when your people are not ready for it.It will take a Few more Generations.


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 56

Hopefully these inspections cover things that come from external sources, like fuel. Dual engine failures can be caused by bad fuel, which not only happened on a Jetstar 787, but also a Cathay A330


Reply
(@Brian)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 77

Has anyone checked to see if they raised their flaps after takeoff instead of their landing gear? The video of the crash shows the gear down and flaps up. Opposite of the expected configuration.


Reply
(@Marco)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 99

That is probably the most plausible (but not sole) theory so far.


Reply
(@modok)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 23

More footage of the crash site was filmed, including the starboard wing, and it did have the slats fully deployed. So I do think that they didn't retract the flaps by accident.


Reply
(@HotBird)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 29

As I noted elsewhere. Looking up that particular plane on flightradar24, it was consistently delayed the days before. Could be maintenance, could be anything. Let’s wait for the experts to do their work, for them to make flying once again safer.


Reply
(@indopithecus)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 170

Give me a break.


Reply
(@Michael)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 14

Lucky,

You watch Captain Steeeve yet?

His theory of co-pilot error is quite startling


Reply
(@Throwawayname)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 739

Or it may mostly be a PR exercise to show that the state apparatus is doing something in response to the tragedy. I wouldn't criticise them for that, after all it's often said, with good reason, that perception is reality.


Reply
(@Michael Graves)
Joined: 1 year ago

Posts: 1

Captain Steve has since changed his opinion after videos of the RAT being deployed surfaced. He has posted a new video.


Reply