RED Air MD-82 Catch...
 

RED Air MD-82 Catches Fire At Miami Airport After Landing

19 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
168 Views
Posts: 39796
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#13636]
wpf-cross-image

While there were reportedly no serious injuries, an aircraft with 140 people onboard skidded off the runway and caught fire on Tuesday while landing at Miami Airport.

Continue reading: RED Air MD-82 Catches Fire At Miami Airport After Landing

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


18 Replies
18 Replies
(@Endre)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 356

Aaaaaand again, selfish idiots take their luggage with them during an evacuation. They should be sued.


Reply
 305
(@305)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 435

Not only did this idiot take a video during the evacuation, but they also clearly have their carry on with them. Appalling behavior.


Reply
(@Simon)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 19

And he has his water bottle!!! God forbid he gets dehydrated going down the slide. JFC.


Reply
(@Francis Rath)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 29

There should be a way to lock all compartments on an emergency so no one can get their carryon


Reply
(@Porque)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 1

That video also tell me that hardly anyone pay attention to the flight safety demo. Why even have these safety demo. when people are still bringing their carry on with them when they have 90 second to evac. from a burning airplane.


Reply
(@Not Lucky)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 59

We live in a country that prizes individual freedom over civic and social responsibility. Why are we surprised when people are then selfish and inane like this? It's wholly unacceptable behaviour, but it's what we (or half of us I guess) encourage.

"It's a free country, if you don't like it, don't get on a plane" right?

That aside, how stupid are people? There are only two reasonable actions in an emergency situation. Option 1 - get the hell out of there and as far away as fast as possible. Option 2 - save someone else's life.


Reply
Diamond
(@creditcrunch)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 647

It was discussed by the various transport security agencies and the consensus was it could delay the evacuation process because passengers would try and break open the overhead bins causing bottle necks in the aisles.


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6145

Another news reported 124 passengers.

Am I wrong to think this is just a charade to smuggle illegal immigrants?


Reply
 MG
(@MG)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 79

I'm not catching where it was states this individual who was filming was a US citizen. Therefore, you cant assume what I believe is political angst against a certain political affiliation in the US to this person filming. I do agree on the stupidity repeated in the comments, though.


Reply
(@Not Lucky)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 59

Not about political affiliation. As a country, we tend to prize the individual over the collective. Our whole society tends to function this way. This is in stark contrast to some (not all) other countries around the world. Nobody knows what is 'right' or 'wrong' but it often manifests palpably badly in situations such as this.

Bottom line - if you're thinking about others and society, you get the hell out of there or help. If you're thinking only about yourself and your material possessions, you make sure you take your bags with you. It's definitely not a fundamental part of flight or fight to stop to gather your belongings. Not how your amygdala works.


Reply
 John
(@John)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 1034

Unpopular but true: you wag your finger at people instinctively taking their stuff with them. But how would YOU react having never been in a plane crash? Be honest with yourself. Think about it, and be completely honest. How would you really react?? 100% would obviously say they'd do 'the right thing' and follow crew instructions. But in real life, they'd probably be doing what these 'idiots' did. It's human instinct: protect your property (and your kids)! Could you really fight against 250,000 year old human instinct? As the saying goes, 'When you point a finger, three fingers point back at you!'.


Reply
(@Not Lucky)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 59

Not entirely true though. It's usually a minority that take their bags. Human instinct is to either fight or flight. If something's burning, you run like hell away from the fire. Or try to save others. It's not really a natural human instinct to save your underwear or even your camera. That's a developed but messed up sense of priorities in which you're comfortable saying your underwear is worth risking someone else's life.

I think there's also a weird thinking process that people go through in which they somehow assess the situation to not actually be life threatening. Put another way, if a fire breathing dragon was aiming at them directly, they wouldn't pause for their luggage, I'd bet my life on it.

You are right that we probably all think we would just run, and that some of us actually would not. And you're right that we won't know until we're in the situation.


Reply
(@Regis)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 28

Dude, what are you talking about? This is a foreign airline with majority foreign passengers. It is clear you hate America but to use this instance as evidence is beyond ludicrous.


Reply
(@K.C. Cooper)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 14

Better yet, permanently banned from flying with the airline ever again.

Airlines should announce this in the pre-flight safety briefing, and re-announce it prior to any emergency landing.
"Any passenger who attempts to retrieve their luggage during an evacuation will be permanently barred from flying with us."

Then, once the headlines start coming, people will learn to have some respect for other's safety. "Passenger permanently banned from airline for retrieving bags during evacuation".

Please consider sending feedback to the airlines to convince them to adopt this policy.


Reply
(@K.C. Cooper)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 14

My opinion is that passengers who try to retrieve their luggage during an evacuation (or otherwise jeopardize the safety of others) should be permanently banned from flying with the airline ever again.

Airlines should announce this in the pre-flight safety briefing, and re-announce it prior to any emergency landing.
"Any passenger who attempts to retrieve their luggage during an evacuation will be permanently barred from flying with us."

Then, once the headlines start coming, people will learn to have some respect for other's safety. "Passenger permanently banned from airline for retrieving bags during evacuation".

Readers, please consider sending feedback to the airlines to convince them to adopt such a policy.


Reply
(@VT-CIE)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 66

This immediately reminded me of REDjet, a defunct low-cost carrier, also from the Caribbean, that also operated MD-82s. The difference being it was from Barbados.


Reply
(@Srini)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 44

What about idiots who were not wearing masks during the pandemic on planes.. that's just as bad. Remember that many people probably had passports and important documents that they need at immigration otherwise they could be in big trouble in the USA so I don't blame them. First world people are clueless about such things.


Reply
(@Planesonfiree)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 1

If you watch the video, everyone seems to run in a crescent pattern back towards the tail where the engine is engulfed.

Who is responsible for crowd control outside of a plane when evacuating? Is it the Cabin Crew or local ground ops? I mean human nature tells you to run away from burning things. But Twitter has given us more courage to get closer to take a video.


Reply