Airlines With Strange Seatbelt Sign Policies...

It has always been my impression that while in the US the seatbelt sign clearly does not apply to the crew (among other things, they get up and start their work before the sign ever goes off after takeoff), for airlines in some other countries it does seem to more or less apply to the crew, at least in an advisory fashion, and the FAs get up and start the service when the sign goes off after takeoff, at a much earlier stage than it ever does on US airlines. It seems like those airlines keep the sign off a much greater share of the time (or presumably the FAs eventually get bored of sitting and call the pilots and remind them to turn it off?).

I had a similar experience on my last few Ryanair flights. The crew did not switch off the seatbelt sign for the entire trip, even on longer flights. I don't understand the idea behind this policy since passengers just stopped obeying it after a while and it made it more difficult for the cabin crew to prepare the cabin for landing.

I've been on several flights where cabin service continued while the seatbelt sign was on, until the pilots advised that the cabin crew should take their seats. By that stage the turbulence was moderately bad.

There was a flight where the captain advised the FAs to suspend service and be seated as she'd been warned of severe turbulence ahead at our altitude, yet nothing came of it.

Safety first.

We had 4 sectors with EVA in September/October, and the seatbelt sign didn’t even seem to have a “bing” when it went on and off on the 787, and a tiny almost inaudible “bing” on the Airbus 330. But then, the PA volumes were all over the place on the 787, from totally inaudible to blasting. They played their dreadful boarding “jingle” at number 11 on the dial for way too long…it is very short and repetitive

On a sector Taipei to Tokyo, the flight was completely smooth, but the seat belt stayed on most of the flight. About 20 minutes after take-off the crew shot out of their seats to prepare lunch, and people started to use the bathrooms - with the seatbelt sign on. On all 4 sectors the sign was generally ignored, and not announced (well, it might have been but their PAs were rubbish).

The only time it seemed to be acknowledged was our arrival back home in Brisbane where everyone sat dutifully in their seats after the aircraft stopped, waiting for the sign to go out…which took what seemed like an eternity. I have never seen that before!

Just flew 15 hours each way on EK, and the seat belt sign was on for about 3 minutes at the start of each flight, 15 minutes at the end, and 5 minutes in the middle of the first flight while I was having a shower (doh!). None of the other bumps triggered a seat belt sign, even when my water sloshed out of the glass and all over the tablecloth. Go figure.

I flew EVA jfk-tpe and tpe-jfk in March. The would turn the seatbelt sign off after takeoff. We would then hit slight turbulence between hours 1-3, they'd turn it back on and leave it on for the rest of the flight(10-12hrs). So yeah. Nobody really obeyed it least of all the gorgeous cabin crew.

I actually have a slightly different experience of (East) Asian carriers than you, although only with a very limited number of airlines.
On my many flights with Air China, China Airlines and EVA Air, my experience is:
- Air China and China Airlines pretty consistently keep the seatbelt sign on during most or all of the flight.
- EVA Air used to be the same, but in recent years changed a bit; they usually switch it off a while after departure. If there's the slightest bit of turbulence however, they immediately switch it on again and then often "forget" to switch it off afterwards (or just do it very very late).

For me this is a serious safety issue. If the sign is kept on during the whole flight (or at least most of it), at one point you simply have to go to the bathroom and won't know if it's a bad time with turbulence ahead or not. On the other hand, if the sign is switched off in between, you can be sure that there won't be any expected turbulence during that time (of course unexpected turbulence can still happen anytime).
In my opinion, any airline with this "always on" policy is an unsafe airline and any pilot doing that needs a safety refresher training.

Drives me crazy how the US carriers leave the seatbelt sign on for 90% of the flight. Even when the flight is smooth, and I just know the pilots do this for the convenience of the FA’s. I generally try to comply, but in the other hand I have a small bladder… I wish they’d be a bit more reasonable about it like the European and Asian carriers.

They do whatever the hello kitty voices tell them to do.

I have found that some Asian carriers, particularly JAL, ANA, and Vietnam Airlines, will leave the seatbelt sign on for an extremely long time after takeoff, but people seem to basically just ignore it, and the FAs do not enforce it at all.

Yeah on US airlines I basically don’t listen to the seatbelt sign in the middle of a flight anymore- if it’s bad enough the pilots will ask the FAs to sit down. It drives me crazy when pilots leave it on forever on a long haul, but also I don’t want to be awakened by an automated announcement about seatbelts that some planes have either!

On the one hand, FAs (of US airlines) often get on the PA with an exasperated, "ladies and gentleman, the seatbelt sign is on" when they really need people to be in their seats and someone is disobeying. On the other hand, when the sign has clearly been on too long, they don't say anything when people get up. So the trick is to figure out when it's reasonable to get up. Basically, that is after the plane has leveled off after its initial climb and before about 2/3 of the way through the descent to landing, IF there is no obvious turbulence. Inside this window, as long as it's calm, I disregard the seatbelt sign. The only exception is when severe turbulence is anticipated and the pilots ask the FAs to sit down. Then obviously I'm not going to get up, either.

I agree that this is the conventional wisdom. I have been fortunate enough not to travel on UA for a number of years, but on my last flights from London, the sign was on for probably 70% of the time, with zero turbulence.
By contrast, I was on a short 40 minute flight from Canberra to Sydney yesterday, and the sign was turned off about 3 minutes into the flight.
I agree with Ben that ultimately it is defeating the purpose. People will not stay in their seats for 14 hours, with or without a sign. The sign is really the way for the crew to indicate the safer times to walk around, and if they don't do that, the extra cautiousness will backfire.

If you need to delete this I understand, but I just can't help myself...

https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/1c2xmj/the_translated_sign_from_the_movie_airplane/

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0080339/mediaviewer/rm4196182785/

In my experience, there seems to be more leeway for premium cabin passengers to disregard the seatbelt sign. In economy, I've been barked at by the FAs when trying to get up to use the restroom, not realizing the seatbelt sign was on. Meanwhile, I've had flight attendants open the restroom door for me traveling in F on Asian carriers.

If I’m on American once we climb to 10,000 I use the restroom to put my PJs on. They were straight up Nazis on BA ; sir get back in your seat. Who you callin’ sir ?

on SQ it varies wildly in terms of how the crew handles a new in-flight seat belt sign. The closer they must have been to their initial training, the more they will insist on you putting it on, even if in bed mode. Once I had a young steward who thought it was a good idea to wake everybody up in the middle of the night to put them on. I understand there is a legal responsability, but if I choose not to wear one at night and get injured, why should I sue SQ?

Personally whilst seated, my belt is always on. Strangely every time I fly there’s always turbulence as soon as the meal service commences. Last time I traveled from Italy there was moderate chop throughout the entire flight and the crew failed to mention anything, (and not even an apology after a four hour delay although I did get my EU comp promptly ).

Do you actually know what Nazis are ? If alluding to staff who may be strict / firm shows the kind of clown you probably are. The crew didn’t do what the Nazis did or still do in your country seeing as your most likely American.

I find RYR is definitely an outlier here and keep the seatbelt sign on for much longer than other airlines. In the aftermath of Covid, their policy was to keep the sign on for the entire flight; needless to say it was ignored and not enforced by the crew.

I flew on EVA Air earlier this year and it was fine. The seat belt light was turned off for hours on the flights to and from the U.S. For the connection within Asia, I don't remember because I was sleeping most of the time.

I believe it is QF’s policy that if the sign is on, the crew must be seated. To me that is common sense.

I'm sometimes surprised how LH Group pilots often don't turn on the sign even when it gets quite bumpy (e.g. over Alps). I even had it on Helvetic few days ago, pretty strong turbulence including few of those sudden drops, but the sign remained off.

On Lufthansa itself, you're required to have seat belt on even when the sign is off, so the sign really just means "remain seated", but that's on the case on subsidiaries (OS, LX..).

Well, you may not sue them but if you, in case of a severe turbulence, land on some other passenger with your full weight, they may be the one suing. Seatbelt is not there just for your safety, but also for safety of people around you. This is why I hate crews that don't enforce rules. Wanna kill yourself? Be my guest but don't kill me by flying around the cabin.

that's not the case *

Agree with @Simon. Whether it is using the lav or getting into the overhead bins, premium cabin passengers rarely are commanded back to their seats.

US airlines seems more relaxed about moving around when the lights on, uk carriers hate ppl moving around at the best of times. Theyre all far more relaxed about it in F/J than Y tho.

Begone, woketrooper! 😀

And then there's Ryanair, where they turn it on so the pilot can use the toilet!

I've been finding it more and more ridiculous how often the seat belt sign is on with Southwest these days. On a recent flight I was sitting near the front and we hit a slight bump. I was illustrating to my companion how quick they are to turn it on and pointed right as it came on and I probably rolled my eyes and we laughed. The FA made it a point to come by and educate me that the sign is on for our safety. The continued their service. It didn't get turned off for quite some time.

On another recent flight back from Hawaii I think it was on the entire time with the exception of about 20 minutes where the pilot said they found some "smooth air". Funny, I didn't think what we were in wasn't smooth. Then we hit another slight bump and it goes back on. I couldn't wait any longer and got up. It wasn't that bumpy, but it wasn't smooth as glass either. The FA didn't say a word.

TLDR, if the planes a rockin', I don't go a knockin', but if I can walk to the lav without steadying myself, it's fair game regardless of what the sign says.

I will also add that on another shorter flight the FA's were not the most cordial and I don't think they wanted to even bother with service. Shortly after takeoff the pilot informed us that because it was bumpy they wouldn't do a beverage or snack service. It was smooth as glass. The FA's remained seated the entire time. I think they just didn't wanna do a service.

I flew Air China for two long-hail segments and they just keep the light on the whole time, at that point the seatbelt sign is little more than decoration

I am wa-a-y out of date on this and not sure if it could have any relationship whatsoever to seat belt signs but...

I was often in Taipei in the 1980s. At that time the major boulevards through the city had unusual traffic lights for vehicles. The intersections, including major boulevards / streets crossing each other had the usual red /green light traffic lights. However, both the red and green lights were both on continuously all four ways at the intersections! They literally never went off.

I asked about this locally and was told that most people just considered the lights as the starting point for an argument if there was an accident.

Is this still the case in Taipei? If not then when did it stop?