JetBlue Airbus A321...
 

JetBlue Airbus A321 Tips On Tail At JFK

14 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
294 Views
Posts: 39972
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#15643]
wpf-cross-image

Here’s something that’s pretty rare, but not unheard of…

Continue reading: Oops: JetBlue Airbus A321 Tips On Tail At JFK

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


13 Replies
13 Replies
(@Ron Munson)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

Many carriers that operate the A321 require a tail stand while loading or unloading.


Reply
Diamond
(@concordeboy)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1212

Always been rather surprised that we don't see more airlines using tail-stands for A321s. Wonder if B6 will be from now on...


Reply
 JJ
(@JJ)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 129

Sorry Guys, It's me. I was sitting in the back of the plane....


Reply
 Lee
(@Lee)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 1092

And, for av-geeks, what about tail-dragging on takeoff? The tail angle on most airlines is about 15 degrees. The departure angle is typically 15 degrees. Tech manuals typically state that once an aircraft reaches rotation speed, rotation is typically 3 degrees per second for 5 seconds to achieve that 15 degrees. Rotation consumes 1000 feet of runway. Near the end of that rotation, the wheels are off the ground and the tail is clear. At that point, the pilot chooses a rate of climb. Staying at the 15 degrees, you're typically looking at about 2000 feet per minute.


Reply
(@steve64)
Joined: 15 years ago

Posts: 118

In a previous life I worked Load Control (weight-n-balance) for AA
The 727-200 had an arrival limitation :
If there was more than 5000lbs loaded in the aft cargo hold (rare)...
And the planned arrival fuel was less than 18,000lbs (common)...
Then passengers could not be let off until sandbags were added into the forward hold.

I was told it was due to the 3 engines being aft mounted. That plus a heavy load aft meant that we NEED the passengers ahead of the wing to balance it.
IMHO, 'stretch' aircraft models (like the 727-200 & A-321) tend to be a little more touchy. The see-saw effect.


Reply
(@B6 GO Crew.)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

For year many B6 GO crew members spoke of this issue with B6 management and went on dead hears. This issue caused have been avoided but was ejected, due to never happing.


Reply
 Jim
(@Jim)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 1

I have seen that probably all Alaskan Airlines 737s at Sea-Tac Airport have tail stands as standard protocol. Is this based on airline decision / risk management?


Reply
(@MrNonrever)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 10

It's always a rule, don't offloaded the front end of AB or any tail heavy plane regardless of what type. It's not only AB's, there are pics of DC-10's doing the same thing, as loading aft first will do the same thing.


Reply
(@Eskimo)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 6167

Right, blame management because you aren't doing your job properly.


Reply
 Moe
(@Moe)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 153

I believe I read that pilots get immediate feedback after every successful 321 takeoff reporting the rotation angle. The unsuccessful takeoffs are apparent without feedback.


Reply
(@Exit Row)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 341

Proof of how over weight Americans are. Too many Super Sized orders at the airport.


Reply
(@MetsNomad)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 39

Yo' momma's so fat, that when everybody else got off a jetBlue flight...


Reply
 Earl
(@Earl)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 3

This is due to the ground crew not off-loading the aircraft properly. Plain and simple. Look at the load plan(supervisor). The A321 has excellent CG. Either they started offloading significantly after deplaning started or they simply emptied the front hold first.


Reply