Cathay Pacific Movi...
 

Cathay Pacific Moving To JFK Terminal 6, Opening Lounge

37 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
354 Views
Posts: 39746
Admin
Topic starter
(@lucky)
Member
Joined: 13 years ago
[#16590]
wpf-cross-image

New York John F. Kennedy Airport (JFK) is currently undergoing a major redevelopment. As part of this, we’re supposed to see the opening of the new Terminal 6 in early 2026. While we’ve known that the terminal would be occupied by JetBlue, Lufthansa Group, and Aer Lingus, an additional airline has just been announced…

Continue reading: Cathay Pacific Moving To JFK Terminal 6, Opening Lounge

Share your questions, experiences, and thoughts below.


36 Replies
36 Replies
(@Yoloswag420)
Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 550

Cathay Pacific lounges are consistently one of the best even in outstations like TPE or HND where they outshine the local carriers' own lounges. Or even LHR to be honest.

There'll certainly be high expectations for the JFK lounge, especially for a premium destination like NYC.

CX has actually turned around a lot of their financials and operations in recent times and are making a real comeback.


Reply
(@Peter)
Joined: 5 years ago

Posts: 59

Another Cathay lounge is always welcome.

With all the major renovations underway at JFK, is there not even a rumor of an airside tram connection between all terminals?


Reply
(@shoeguy)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 189

There likely is little to no connectivity on CX to AA at JFK. It would also not surprise if CX eventually leaves OW.


Reply
 Alan
(@Alan)
Joined: 10 years ago

Posts: 37

Are Lingus also announced they will be moving to T6 and operating their own lounge too


Reply
(@Shaundella)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 1

JFK is such a ghetto airport.


Reply
(@Nasir)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 127

@Ben
When is Cathay Pacific revealing their first 777-300ER with Aria suites? They said it will be revealed in Q2 of 2024. Q2 is coming to an end. Any update?


Reply
Admin
(@lucky)
Joined: 13 years ago

Member
Posts: 39746

@ Nasir -- Unfortunately I haven't seen any updates, so it seems like the product is delayed. That's not surprising, between all the supply chain delays we've seen, plus the need for a new product to be certified.


Reply
(@Julia)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 985

It does give off a trailer park quality to some.


Reply
(@Julia)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 985

"since getting between Terminal 6 and Terminal 8 will require taking the AirTrain landside"

On average, how bad of an experience is it to transfer between the 2? In terms of time and what you actually have to do...


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 46

Pretty bad, T8's AirTrain stop is quite a bit away, and given the construction it might be that T6's AirTrain stop will be at T5 until T7 fully shuts down and is replaced.


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 46

Ben, if only you had a crystal ball and could tell us when they're deployed on HKG-JFK, too


Reply
(@David)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 46

T5-T6 will be connected airside, T7 will be gone.
T1-T4 will be connected airside.

So three groupings of T1-T4, T5-T6, and T8. If all of the *A airlines move into T5-T6, or if the OW linkages between B6, CX and wherever AS goes, it's still roughly even.


Reply
(@Jason)
Joined: 12 years ago

Posts: 1324

The VAST majority of pax on these flights start/ end at JFK, very few, relatively speaking, are connecting to/from CX at JFK. CX cares about the overall experience for the majority of customers, and this new terminal delivers it, in their opinion. The relatively few people that connect to CX from AA or other airlines will simply have to take the train.


Reply
 Evan
(@Evan)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 33

How "close" of a relationship does CX have with other OW members? I get there may not be many connection opportunities, but I would think all the OW members under one roof (i.e. - Terminal 8) would create some synergy?


Reply
Diamond
(@inceptioncat)
Joined: 4 years ago

Member
Posts: 173

Cathay and LH have been getting cozy of late. On Miles&More i've been seeing lots of award availabilty between Europe and HKG which wasn't the case months before. Even in First class from LHR. The airlines have for a couple of years been codesharing on flights to HKG and Australia.


Reply
(@betterbub)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 710

Still better than LAS (but so is every other airport I've been to)


Reply
Gold
(@ethaninsf)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

I think people underestimate that the airline alliances are mostly just marketing partnerships. Joint Ventures are what provide synergies and incentives for airlines to align operations (hence why BA and AA co-locate and share lounges). Airlines in an alliance still remain and operate as separate companies with their own strategies in mind. Sure, if they are members of the same alliance, an airline will accept elites at its lounge from another airline for reimbursement at pre-negotiated rate. But, Cathay most likely views NYC as an O/D market for the most part and therefore is competing against all airlines, including its oneworld partners (namely JAL and AA) for passengers to HKG and beyond. So having its own facilities it controls benefits it in keeping its customers happiest.


Reply
(@asim24)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

amazing! now only if award availability on cathay improved...


Reply
 Joey
Diamond
(@joey-4)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 1215

I’m excited!!! I wonder if CX will have a special partnership with JetBlue?


Reply
(@Mike O.)
Joined: 7 years ago

Posts: 1046

Just like their move from Terminal 1 to 4 at SIN, they seem to want to be on their own with their own lounge space, etc. in a much smaller space. Lufthansa will also be one of the first customers for the 779 and Terminal 6 will probably be one of the first if not first terminal to handle 779 service (Emirates uses 4 at JFK), so it'll be a good way to get feedback and experience on how the 779 handles in and out of the terminal as well as the ground crew, etc.

As far as the Aria Suites are concerned, my guess would be once the 779s start coming in, the 77Ws will be supplemented on an additional frequency in addition to the 779 on premium routes like LHR, LAX, CDG, etc.


Reply
(@usukhkflyer)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Aside from the fact that most of the traffic if O&D, JFK is not the ideal transfer point for anyone flying from HKG to another point in North America or even the Americas in general anyway. You can reach most of those places via AA from a connection at SFO/LAX/ORD more efficiently.


Reply
 Mark
(@Mark)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 24

With Air China's investment in CX (30%), what are the chances CX leaving OW and join STAR? CX might not have long term plans with OW.


Reply
Gold
(@cxtraveller)
Joined: 4 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

In the latest press release about Skytrax ranking, CX mentioned the Aria Suite will come out "later this year." It also mentioned the new flat-bed business class for A330 coming out in 2026; however, it didn't say the A330-300 or possibly new order that may happen for A330NEO.


Reply
 Joe
(@Joe)
Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 186

Bit of a bizarre move IMO. Love Cathay lounges. But OneWorld should just invest together in Terminal 8. Don’t see how this makes financial sense. Looking forward to the lounge, though.


Reply
(@usukhkflyer)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 0

Air China has had that stake for a long time without Cathay switching alliances (and Swire, Cathay's owner, has an interlocking equal stake in Air China).


Reply
Diamond
(@quorumcall)
Joined: 3 years ago

Member
Posts: 245

and for O&D this is amazing -- new terminal, great new lounge, better and more modern experience. Once completed Cathay will be miles ahead of all the other major Asian airlines at JFK as well. SQ for example, for all of their claims of premiumness, still uses contract lounges (including the frankly terrible Air India Maharaja lounge). so brilliant move by CX execs


Reply
(@Aroundtheworld)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 138

This feels like the same strategy they have at SIN, being tucked away in the (newer) T4, different from all other OW airlines (mainly T1, MH is T2), but it gives CX their signature lounge. Most other T4 airlines are budget carriers.

I assume there's some financial incentives for taking less connected space.


Reply
(@Ezawa Tami)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 30

It will make AA to CX less efficient but B6 to CX more efficient. CX has just picked the side.


Reply
(@TravelinWilly)
Joined: 18 years ago

Posts: 2631

…and who in their right mind would choose AA over CX?

As a DC denizen, I’ll happily fly CX to an AA JFK connection than take AA on any long haul segments.


Reply
(@Megan)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 3

I'm hoping a move to T6 hints at more airside connections as well.

Probably too optimistic, but a girl can hole.


Reply
(@Megan)
Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 3

Atleast it doesn't have indoor portapotties. I'm looking at you EWR domestic Term B.


Reply
 Timo
Diamond
(@timo)
Joined: 5 years ago

Member
Posts: 369

I think you misunderstood the post. @USUKHKflyer means that CX pax could more easily connect to AA domestic at LAX/SFO/ORD rather than overflying the country to JFK just to back track to Vegas or wherever. He is not suggesting HK pax to fly AA internationally... especially since AA suspended those flights with the covid onset.


Reply
(@NateNate)
Joined: 8 years ago

Posts: 596

Why can't UA get gates and lounge space at JFK T6?


Reply
 Lu
(@Lu)
Joined: 9 years ago

Posts: 26

I think this is an indirect confirmation that Cathay Pacific will move to Star Alliance. They won't be with Oneworld for long.


Reply
(@Justin)
Joined: 11 years ago

Posts: 13

Unlike the rest of the world, the US doesn’t make flight connection simple and easy, even within one terminal. Cathay must have make this decision based on the fact that most HKG-JFK traffic is point to point or connection beyond HKG. AA/BA also charges them a lot for using their lounges at T8 now. Very smart and logical move for Cathay. They will offer the best passenger experience of all airlines out of JFK for sure.


Reply
(@Bw007)
Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 25

100% agree with you. I had to use that lounge one time when traveling on Singapore airlines. Worst experience ever.


Reply