A statement by a JetBlue employee on social media has the internet up in arms. There’s only one problem… it wasn’t actually accurate!
In this post:
Did JetBlue raise price by $230 for a flight to a funeral?
On April 18, 2026, an X user wrote the following:
I love flying @JetBlue but a $230 increase on a ticket after one day is crazy I’m just trying to make it to a funeral
Airfare fluctuates all the time, so while that fare increase sucks, you wouldn’t think much of this. Well, except for the detail of how JetBlue responded to this customer:
Try clearing your cache and cookies or booking with an incognito window. We’re sorry for your loss.
That’s quite a claim from the airline, and the post has now been viewed roughly 1.5 million times, and a countless number of politicians have chimed in, claiming they’re going to investigate this. For example, Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego took this completely out of context, writing the following:
Is Jet Blue openly admitting to raising someone’s price hundreds of dollars because they know they have to go to a funeral? Grief shouldn’t come with surge pricing.
We need to pass my bill to make surveillance pricing illegal.
Even if one were to believe that the airline was engaging in any sort of price discrimination based on the traveler’s location or browser, it’s absurd to suggest that JetBlue raised the price specifically because the passenger was going to a funeral, as if airlines ask you during the booking process what the exact purpose of your trip was.
What’s really going on with this claim from a JetBlue employee?
I imagine the employee responding on JetBlue’s behalf meant well, but I have no clue what they were thinking. Airlines simply don’t use this kind of data to determine pricing. Airlines have all kinds of ways they do price discriminate (like whether you’re traveling one-way or roundtrip, if you’re traveling with companions, etc.), but airlines absolutely don’t charge different fares based on these kinds of details. This was a fare increase, plain and simple.
Of course one would hope that you can take an official airline representative at face value, but humans make mistakes. The reality is that this was a simple mistake, and there’s no conspiracy theory or cover-up here. The fare went up because airfare pricing is complicated, and any of a number of factors could’ve driven that (like the last seat in a cheaper fare bucket selling out).
JetBlue has also confirmed this in a statement, writing that fares “are not determined by cached data or other personal information.” So while it was definitely bad that the employee made the mistake in what they communicated, that’s the extent of the scandal here. It’s almost if the JetBlue employee searched online about how to unlock lower fares, found that conspiracy theory, and then passed it on.
Of course that won’t stop people from trying to use this for their narrative. For example, a MarketWatch story quotes a progressive think tank executive director, who said the following:
“JetBlue accidentally tweeted their cold-blooded confession: They are using customers’ search history against them to drive up price. While JetBlue is now claiming the post was an ‘error,’ their only mistake was pulling back the curtain on their own deceptive pricing practices.”
Believe what you’d like, but nope. Their only error was… making the error in the formation they shared. Period.
Bottom line
A passenger traveling to a funeral took to social media to share frustration about the cost of a JetBlue ticket increasing considerably overnight. That’s not much of a story, except for the fact that JetBlue responded on social media, essentially suggesting the airline was using surveillance pricing, and that booking incognito or in a different browser would unlock a lower fare.
I can confidently say this was an error, and that the airline doesn’t engage in these kinds of tactics. But of course that’s now causing a lot of people to attack the airline.
What do you make of this JetBlue social media controversy?
Hey , we all know they are gouging us whenever they can . No surprises here .
This myth has been spreading around for well over a decade despite being complete BS (yes, NDS allows it but no airline uses it in practice - I think DL tried briefly and it failed spectacularly), it's in fact my favourite example of how misinformation spreads on the internet irrespective of how little foundation it has in reality.
Every. Single. Day. This comment section has an absolute conniption over Trump calling him every name in the book and spewing hatred. Today, Lucky posts a tweet from a sitting senator who is embroiled in his own sexual misconduct investigation and it's crickets. And don't @ me about Trump did this, Trump did that, you're MAGA trash or whatever. Trump did whatever he did and so did this guy. Let's play it consistantly.
A sitting Senator's inability keep his dick in his pants has zero impact on almost everyone on Planet Earth. Every fuggin' day Trump makes all our lives harder and that's why we call him out every day.
Look I'm gonna be honest here - I don't care that it isn't true at present. I think Gallego's point is that such pricing models are technically possible, so legislation is a good way to prevent surveillance pricing. He's right! Even if it isn't happening actively in this instance, these ideas are under active consideration in huge swaths of corporate America, so that is what Gallego is responding to.
He also wants to be President,...
Look I'm gonna be honest here - I don't care that it isn't true at present. I think Gallego's point is that such pricing models are technically possible, so legislation is a good way to prevent surveillance pricing. He's right! Even if it isn't happening actively in this instance, these ideas are under active consideration in huge swaths of corporate America, so that is what Gallego is responding to.
He also wants to be President, so these kinds of consumer friendly law proposals are a very easy way to raise a national profile.
If they are changing prices based on cookies it should be possible to replicate to prove it?
Its certainly possible that like what seems to be a lot of airline cs, they dont actually know whats going on and are giving incorrect information based on what theyve read on the internet.
What seems to be more common tho, certainly amongst some se asian airlines is to increase the prices based on when ppl actually search...
If they are changing prices based on cookies it should be possible to replicate to prove it?
Its certainly possible that like what seems to be a lot of airline cs, they dont actually know whats going on and are giving incorrect information based on what theyve read on the internet.
What seems to be more common tho, certainly amongst some se asian airlines is to increase the prices based on when ppl actually search for flights. The price goes up and then usually comes back down the next day - but this isnt based on local cookies, as the higher price shows on all devices and ota sites. Maybe jetblue were doing that.
I passed this tip to your inbox early Sunday morning btw.
It's happening (even if they and other corporations deny it), unless and until we actually, meaningfully protect consumers from such deceptive, manipulative tactics.
In 196 days, we can vote for better representatives, some of whom may actually do so; otherwise, we'll keep enshitifying into full-blown corporate feudalism.
This is similar to the “book on a Tuesday” advice some may give.
That, at least, has a historical, statistical basis in reality. (Even if it was never an absolute, and has been out of date for a couple of decades.)
HTF would Jetblue know someone is going to a funeral? Since deregulation airlines have generally always charged more for close in purchase of tickets. A funeral would be one reason. People don't plan their date of death four months in advance.
More personalized pricing is coming in some form, specifically if you're a FF and have a history with the airline. The algo will know your "pain point" and price the fare accordingly. You will...
HTF would Jetblue know someone is going to a funeral? Since deregulation airlines have generally always charged more for close in purchase of tickets. A funeral would be one reason. People don't plan their date of death four months in advance.
More personalized pricing is coming in some form, specifically if you're a FF and have a history with the airline. The algo will know your "pain point" and price the fare accordingly. You will also see it more with individuals like me that if don't buy premium outright purchase the upsell. That's even easier to determine one's breaking point.
IATA's entire NDC (New Distribution Capability) is based upon customised product offerings for each customer, which is just another name for the same concept. Static distribution systems like today's GDS are a patchwork of legacy systems layered on each other and tied together with shoestrings - they have to evolve and for better or worse, customised product offerings are the way of the future.
Current laws allow airlines to price down for individual offers, but not up.
Could you elaborate on that. I've never heard of this.
Oh is that the key to their unrealistic over the top profitability?
Yeah, usually deceiving others can be like a temporary 'cheat code' ...but also usually we don't allow those games to be played in a civilized society with rules and laws actually enforced...
The "clear your cookies" thing never made any sense to me.
Let's assume airlines are tracking interest from searches: clearing your cookies would make it look like multiple people are interested in the route. Surely that would make price-gouging more attractive than the route being searched multiple times by a single user?
No, it's because you are registering lots of views for that route/product and the algorithm notices how keen you are and "could" raise the price just for you. I haven't seen it myself. My wife says it happens when she's trying to buy cosmetics...... #roll eyes
Lololol I hope your wife isn't reading this cos someone will sleep in the living room tonight
@UncleRonnie - But even that doesn't make sense. If I keep searching for something, it means that the existing offers aren't acceptable for me so actually lowering the price makes more sense. Usually when I search for a price and then it goes up by the time I finish the purchase, the most likely outcome is that I won't finish the purchase.
You may want to be more nuanced here. The airline likely has no way of knowing about the purpose of your trip (such as a funeral) though they do use public data for events to help predict demand and therefore pricing. However, as revenue management technology gets more sophisticated, servailance pricing becomes more real - identifying interest by what you're looking at, and how many times you're looking at it and using that information with...
You may want to be more nuanced here. The airline likely has no way of knowing about the purpose of your trip (such as a funeral) though they do use public data for events to help predict demand and therefore pricing. However, as revenue management technology gets more sophisticated, servailance pricing becomes more real - identifying interest by what you're looking at, and how many times you're looking at it and using that information with real time pricing to adjust the offer to the customer. We've already seen basic versions of this - OTAs modifying pricing based on iOS/Mac access vs Android/PC access. AI, Data brokers with more and more data to sell, cookies, and other methods of identifying customers, intent and price elasticity means that personalized pricing will become a day to day reality.