Southwest Airlines & EVA Air Launch Partnership: What Are The Implications?

Southwest Airlines & EVA Air Launch Partnership: What Are The Implications?

15

Southwest Airlines is currently undergoing a major transformation, which includes charging for checked bags, introducing assigned and extra legroom seating, etc. It goes beyond that, though, as Southwest is also increasingly launching airline partnerships.

Earlier this year, we saw Southwest launch its first partnership with Icelandair, and the expectation is that Southwest will fly to Iceland. Then we saw the airline announce China Airlines as its second partner, and now we’re seeing the airline reveal its third partner. This carrier is actually based at the same airport as the first partner in Asia, which makes you wonder about the strategic rationale.

New Southwest & EVA Air interline agreement

Southwest Airlines and EVA Air have introduced an interline agreement, which kicks in effective immediately. With this, travelers can start booking tickets that include travel on both Southwest and EVA Air. This is initially available at four transpacific gateways — Chicago (ORD), Los Angeles (LAX), San Francisco (SFO), and Seattle (SEA).

EVA Air is Southwest’s newest airline partner

As Southwest describes it, “this partnership is another step forward as we continue our mission to bring more choices (and new horizons) to our Customers.” For context, EVA Air belongs to Star Alliance, and is based at Taipei Taoyuan (TPE). Funny enough, China Airlines is also based at that airport, and is the biggest competitor to EVA Air. So it’s interesting to see how Southwest’s two first Asian partners are based at the same airport.

For now this partnership only includes an interline agreement. This is the most basic level of cooperation two airlines can have. There’s no codeshare agreement, or loyalty collaboration, or anything. The interline agreement simply makes it possible to book a ticket that includes travel on both airlines. This possibility is already available online, on EVA Air’s website.

Book tickets with Southwest & EVA Air flights

There’s not really a whole lot to this partnership

Southwest is still new to the world of airline partnerships, so it’s interesting to see the approach the carrier is taking. For example, Icelandair was announced as the first partner, and it seems pretty clear the airlines are actually planning a higher level of cooperation, eventually having a codeshare agreement, frequent flyer reciprocity, etc.

However, it’s interesting to now see Southwest partner with both SkyTeam’s China Airlines and Star Alliance’s EVA Air. These airlines are two huge competitors, so personally I wouldn’t read too much into this partnership.

For example, EVA Air and Alaska Airlines also have an interline agreement that lets you book tickets including travel on both airlines. However, those airlines don’t otherwise don’t have any sort of commercial cooperation beyond that.

Alaska & EVA Air also have an interline agreement

I can see big upside to Southwest establishing close partnerships with foreign carriers that enhance the value proposition of the loyalty program. However, just picking up low pro-rated interline revenue doesn’t exactly seem like a strategy that will materially impact financial performance. Then again, with Southwest no longer being a “premium” airline that includes all kinds of services, I guess the company is more happy with that than in the past, and there’s not much downside to this.

Southwest is starting to dabble with partnerships

Bottom line

Southwest Airlines and EVA Air have just launched a partnership. In reality, this is the most basic form of cooperation you can have, as this is simply an interline agreement that allows you to book travel including flights on both airlines (while also being able to check bags).

It’s interesting how Southwest’s first two interline partners in Asia are both based in Taipei, which suggests to me that these agreements will likely be pretty casual.

What do you make of Southwest & EVA Air partnering?

Conversations (15)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Hodor Diamond

    Isn't it interesting how both the Asian partners are based at the same airport?

  2. Andrew Diamond

    I like Eva… but this doesn’t make me look more favorably at them or Southwest. I’m guessing this is for PHX connectivity, though really, Eva should have partnered with AA for that.

    1. chasgoose Guest

      EVA isn’t adding PHX. Southwest already had that covered with its CI agreement.

  3. henare Diamond

    *snif*... southwest is finally a grown up airline?

  4. Connor Guest

    Southwest doesn't have a ton of great options as feed for international connections. Most of their hubs don't line up with international service. See: BWI in lieu of IAD, DAL instead of DFW, MDW instead of ORD, etc. Why on earth would anyone want to purposely book an itinerary requiring a landside connection between airports?

  5. Eric Ji Guest

    I think the bigger implication here is that PHX-TPE is coming. They saw Starlux and China Airlines launch within months, and they want in on the semiconductor traffic.

  6. Tony Guest

    Southwest is a willing (too willing?) partner right now. Both EVA and China Airlines are looking for US partners, as their US alliance partners (UA and DL, respectively) offer them very little and don't really value their partnerships that much. So, why not?

    1. yoloswag420 Guest

      Largely because of the joint ventures that UA and DL have with ANA and KE respectively.

      UA and DL are incentivized to sell seats via TYO or ICN with ANA and KE connections since they can make 100% of the revenue by doing so.

      Codeshare flights with BR or CI would technically be competitors to them. That's why you don't see close alignment.

  7. Eskimo Guest

    Quickly find a partner that I can burn my RR on so I can dump WN forever.

    If they are becoming like the legacy 3, there are 3 better airlines to fly with.

  8. Austen_J Member

    EVA AIR on their Instagram also teased new destinations. The Points Guy, back in 2024, reported that the executives at EVA AIR eyed new routes to Boston Logan, Washington Dulles, and Dallas (before EVA AIR officially announced Dallas). When looking at the Instagram post, the only three comments EVA AIR replied to (with a "✈") are "Where?", "Better be Boston!", and "Washington DC??", signifying that EVA AIR will most likely announce expansions into Boston and DC!

  9. derek Guest

    Southwest is no longer the weird airline so it's fine. In fact, they should consider EVA Air taking an ownership stake in Southwest and then changing the name to EVA Air (USA).

    If that were to happen, the larger US airlines could be United, Delta, American, Alaska, and EVA Air. If that were to happen, how about Starlux taking an ownership stake in Alaska so that the brands would be United, Delta, American, Starlux/Hawaiian, and EVA Air.

    1. Eskimo Guest

      You have a misconception that these Taiwanese carriers have a lot of money.

  10. Anthony Guest

    I don't understand WN's approach to arbitrarily adding partnerships that "connect" at airports that WN doesn't have any scale? How many WN connections exist in the airports listed, and 3/4 airports are already Star Alliance hubs which makes this make even less sense.

    1. yoloswag420 Guest

      It makes about as much sense as the United/JetBlue partnership at JFK.

  11. yoloswag420 Guest

    I do think it's quite interesting though.

    BR/CI have largely operated in a different playing field due to how the Asia TPAC JVs focus a lot on JAL/ANA/KE, so BR and CI have never been treated as tier 1 or even tier 2 partners. Codeshare is extremely limited both on the US and Asia side and often priced very poorly.

    Southwest is sort of similar in that they operate a very different network from the...

    I do think it's quite interesting though.

    BR/CI have largely operated in a different playing field due to how the Asia TPAC JVs focus a lot on JAL/ANA/KE, so BR and CI have never been treated as tier 1 or even tier 2 partners. Codeshare is extremely limited both on the US and Asia side and often priced very poorly.

    Southwest is sort of similar in that they operate a very different network from the big 3 legacy carriers. So I can see this setup working out nicely to boost US feed.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Anthony Guest

I don't understand WN's approach to arbitrarily adding partnerships that "connect" at airports that WN doesn't have any scale? How many WN connections exist in the airports listed, and 3/4 airports are already Star Alliance hubs which makes this make even less sense.

1
Hodor Diamond

Isn't it interesting how both the Asian partners are based at the same airport?

0
chasgoose Guest

EVA isn’t adding PHX. Southwest already had that covered with its CI agreement.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT