It has been an absolutely wild several weeks in the Middle East, as the United States and Israel launched an attack on Iran, which took out some top Iranian officials. In response, Iran launched drone attacks on nearby countries, including targeting airports, hotels, and more.
Weeks later, there’s no end in sight to this conflict, and one wonders how much longer this will drag on. There’s no denying that people are suddenly looking at airlines in the Gulf region a little bit differently, and I’d like to talk about that a bit more in this post…
In this post:
Could this conflict be a turning point for some Gulf carriers?
Let me start by acknowledging that of course there are massive geopolitical implications to what we’ve seen in the past several weeks, and that goes way beyond the airline industry. However, this blog is about travel, so that’s what I’d like to focus on, while acknowledging that there are many ways this can all evolve.
Airlines like Emirates, Etihad, Qatar, etc., have all become extremely “mainstream” over the years, with so many travelers choosing to fly with the airlines when moving between other regions. So whether it’s Australians looking to travel to the UK, or Europeans looking to vacation in Southeast Asia, airlines like Emirates have become huge competitors in those markets, going head-to-head against “local” carriers.
Destinations like Dubai, and airlines like Emirates, have enjoyed such a high level of success thanks to the incredible safety within the country for visitors (both real and perceived). While the Middle East is a region that has seen its fair share of conflict over time, places like the UAE thrive on staying out of the drama, despite their geographic proximity.
So to see Dubai Airport sustain damage, and to see a fire at a hotel like the Burj Al Arab that’s due to an attack by an Iranian drone, certainly isn’t great for tourism in the country. Now, let me say that personally I’d still feel comfortable traveling to Dubai, etc. Even as we see some pretty rough images, the actual number of fatalities seems to be very limited, and that’s where I try to be rational.
The UAE offers incredible safety in so many areas for visitors, and here in the United States we have our own dangers that we try to overlook (like gun violence). So as I see it (at least as of now), places like the UAE may have more of an issue with optics than anything else.

Will these attacks change consumer behavior going forward?
In the short term, we’ve seen the major Gulf carriers all massively adjust their operations. We’ve briefly seen airlines grounded, and we’ve otherwise seen them operate a more limited schedule. The issue is that we’ve seen operations suspended so often now, which can cause extended holding at airports, diversions, etc.
To me this all raises an interesting question. If things do eventually go back to normal (or at least a new type of normal), what will that look like for Gulf carriers? Historically people have gone out of their way to fly with Gulf carriers thanks to the great service and competitive pricing.
And while I think all Gulf hubs are still incredibly safe, I can’t help but think that this situation will change optics of places like Dubai for some amount of time. I’m by no means suggesting that a majority of Emirates’ potential customers will just book away on principle.
However, I wouldn’t be surprised if a not-insignificant number of travelers might say “you know, I’ll just fly nonstop on a European or Southeast Asian carrier, rather than connecting through the Middle East.”
For that matter, a traveler can also arrive at that conclusion on an entirely rational basis, without directly considering safety — if they book a Gulf carrier, they might be concerned about how reliably they can get to their destination, and if we might see more airspace closures.
Then again, I also believe nothing is actually permanent. For example, look at all of the doom and gloom predictions we saw after the start of the coronavirus pandemic, yet the airline industry bounced back quite nicely.
So we’ll see how it all plays out. At this point, I suspect that if we don’t see a full government change in Iran, the risk of these kinds of attacks will remain in place, and I think that could cause a good number of people to book away. But we’ll see, who knows…
Gulf carriers have been growing at an impressive pace in recent years, and there’s no denying that even the demand trajectory changing slightly to be negative could have big long term implications for these airlines.
I do think that for Gulf airlines, what they’re dealing with here is essentially a coronavirus-level event, in terms of the demand impact. I’d love to be wrong, but that’s just my perspective based on there not being a clear end with this military operation.

Bottom line
It has been an awful several weeks in the Middle East, as Iran was attacked, and then responded by sending drones basically anywhere it could. On the airline front, this has caused many Gulf carriers to suspend flights for some amount of time, and also to otherwise modify their schedules.
Places like Dubai have thrived on the image of being incredibly safe. And while I think nothing has really changed, these attacks — and images of the airport and hotels being damaged — aren’t at all good. I have to imagine this could be a rough period for Gulf carriers, especially as some people may avoid future bookings just out of an abundance of caution over potential operational issues.
How do you see the Gulf carrier recovery playing out with all of this?
I think the ME3 will struggle to (maybe ever?) regain the Western premium leisure market. I'm talking cashed-up retirees who do a big trip once or twice a year, are happy to pay for comfort and quality and aren't too bothered about price, or points and miles.
They have long memories and will avoid these airlines "just to be on the safe side", whether that is rational or not.
That should hopefully mean better award availability for those who are happy to fly the ME3!
You're deluding yourself if you think any war in the Middle East will end in "a few weeks". ME3 will be dead for years.
Hi Ben,
I understand this is not a political news platform, but that does not excuse abandoning the most basic standards of honesty in your reporting, analysis, or even headlining.
“Will Gulf Airlines Make A Full Recovery From Iran Attacks? If So, When?” is an exceptionally poor piece of framing. I am not a fan of the Iranian regime, nor of the depravity of the Netanyahu–Trump alliance, but describing this simply as “Iran...
Hi Ben,
I understand this is not a political news platform, but that does not excuse abandoning the most basic standards of honesty in your reporting, analysis, or even headlining.
“Will Gulf Airlines Make A Full Recovery From Iran Attacks? If So, When?” is an exceptionally poor piece of framing. I am not a fan of the Iranian regime, nor of the depravity of the Netanyahu–Trump alliance, but describing this simply as “Iran attacks” is a misleading distortion that leaves readers with a politically convenient impression.
I can see that you provided context at the beginning of the piece, but a headline does not need to be ideological. It does, however, need to be honest. A little humility, a little humanity, and a little more respect for factual context would have made for a far better headline.
good question but the answer is less about safety or its perception in the Middle East countries that host massive airline hubs but about the cost of fuel and the ability of the Middle East countries to move it.
Revenue for Middle East countries has fallen dramatically as the Strait of Hormuz has been nearly completely closed for over a month. Energy experts say that the impact of disruptions of crude and refined products as...
good question but the answer is less about safety or its perception in the Middle East countries that host massive airline hubs but about the cost of fuel and the ability of the Middle East countries to move it.
Revenue for Middle East countries has fallen dramatically as the Strait of Hormuz has been nearly completely closed for over a month. Energy experts say that the impact of disruptions of crude and refined products as well as gas will persist well beyond the opening of the Strait which is far from assured anytime in the near future. Airlines that are not subsidized by countries that are energy exporters will see profits plunge.
While the ME countries will subsidize their airlines to get traffic moving when hostilities cease, this conflict produced a rift between Iran and other Arab neighbors that has never happened on this scale before.
European airlines are already taking advantage of the reduction in competition to overfly Gulf hubs; this all comes at a time when India - which heavily depends on Gulf airlines for international air service - is trying to grow direct service to the rest of the world.
High fuel prices threaten to crush air traffic demand which will hurt Middle East airlines; Asian economies could face the biggest medium and long term impact since they are much more dependent on oil that flows through the Strait while the Americas are largely independent of direct fuel consumption via the Strait. Add in that Europe, other Middle East and Asian countries will likely bear the cost of keeping the Strait open and it will take a long time before a new normal occurs.
In one word , the answer to Ben's question is : "No" .
I just booked a flight from LHR to SIN on Etihad in June- they have some very good deals going at the moment for obvious reasons. I'm travelling solo, and in my view the biggest risk is disruption/getting stranded if the situation escalates.
I understand the comparison with the pandemic, although arguably at some point (say, late 2022), everybody could declare the pandemic as over.
We may see a ceasefire at some point, but with the Mollah and other terror groups still around, will we ever be able to say the war is over?
correct.
This is a cost and fuel availability problem which is not being felt the same around the world on top of war which is affecting some airlines but certainly not others. Fuel cost increases are not affecting all airlines equally.
This is the ME3's 9/11 and they will recover but, whether they deny saying it or not, they don't want to see this chapter of history ever repeated which means eliminating all threats now and as far as can be seen into the future
You have to wonder what this means for the A380. Will the ME3 shed their A380s at a much faster rate? While Emirates will still continue to invest in their fleet of A380s, would they shed their fleet by a significant percentage?
Seeing drones over Dubai and crashing somewhere random is certainly not good optics and it's not something you rarely if ever see at all.
I wonder how this impacts the region at...
You have to wonder what this means for the A380. Will the ME3 shed their A380s at a much faster rate? While Emirates will still continue to invest in their fleet of A380s, would they shed their fleet by a significant percentage?
Seeing drones over Dubai and crashing somewhere random is certainly not good optics and it's not something you rarely if ever see at all.
I wonder how this impacts the region at least in the medium-term especially with tourism and business travel.
To me it isn't about safety, but more logistical issues with fairly frequent airport closures and what not due to attacks. Easier to just avoid the drama for the foreseeable future.
Will airlines from the Gulf be able to bounce back after the United States ( and its lapdog Israel )launched a war, while "Mango Mussolini" goes around offending and alienating all (former) allies? Now he’s talking about constructing a 300-meter-tall “library” in Miami complete with a golden statue of himself, plus a triumphal arch in Washington, D.C., and spending millions on a haphazard ballroom project in the White House, which he’s steadily altering to match...
Will airlines from the Gulf be able to bounce back after the United States ( and its lapdog Israel )launched a war, while "Mango Mussolini" goes around offending and alienating all (former) allies? Now he’s talking about constructing a 300-meter-tall “library” in Miami complete with a golden statue of himself, plus a triumphal arch in Washington, D.C., and spending millions on a haphazard ballroom project in the White House, which he’s steadily altering to match his own preferences (bordello style) and going so far as to rename airports after himself. Then you have him taking advice from that fruitcake Paula White. The rest of the world will hopefully bounce back without the USA.
You seem to have a lot things to say, though I'm struggling to see the connection with Ben's article.
The biggest challenge these carriers will have in the short term is that most major travel insurance providers will not cover flights through Dubai, Doha and other major hubs in the region. So passengers who are willing to assume the risk of flying through the hubs in transit themselves are being forced to choose alternative flights, otherwise their entire policy covering health, etc.. at their destination is voided.